2012 Gmc terrain expert reviews, specs and photos cars.com gas to liquid

##########

Launched in 2010, the Terrain offers just a few updates for 2012, but what’s striking is that the crossover didn’t need much fixing gas constant in kj. (See the two model years compared here.) The Terrain comes relatively well-equipped in its base, SLE trim level, which starts at $25,560. For 2012, the Terrain’s new standard features are technology-focused, including a new standard audio system with SiriusXM satellite radio, a 7-inch touch-screen and a USB input. Bluetooth, cruise control and OnStar remain standard.

Whether you pick the four- or the six-cylinder engine, you’ll get a competent electricity nyc power plant, but not one that will stand out. My V-6, front-wheel-drive test vehicle had plenty of power to get up to speed on the highway, but the six-speed automatic wasn’t as smooth as others in this class. For most drivers, though, it likely will not be an issue.

We’ve had issues with the estimated mileage of the four-cylinder engine in the Chevy Equinox; it rarely reached the EPA’s 22/32 mpg gas under 3 dollars city/highway numbers. The V-6 Terrain, over a thousand-plus-mile road trip, rarely dropped below the EPA’s 24 mpg highway rating. That was with just me and a suitcase, in cool weather — between 20 and 40 degrees — across flat land with a 70 mph speed limit most of the way.

In the Terrain, the move is welcome. My longest stretch of driving was nine hours, from Chicago to Toronto. Even during that drive, my back never became sore. The leather seats in the SLT trim were comfortable, with plenty of lumbar and thigh support. In comparison, I drove a smaller compact crossover gas density calculator on a particularly long commute, and my back was aching after an hour. Everyone’s body is different, but the comfort level of the Terrain and Equinox has been praised by other Cars.com editors as well.

I simply loved the multimedia and navigation system in the Terrain. It utilized the best of the touch-screen world as well as having physical buttons and knobs. I probably wouldn’t rave as much electricity jeopardy game about this mix of controls if it weren’t for the fact that Ford relies on touch-sensitive panels that have irked our staff recently. The layout and screen clarity are a bit cleaner than that of the new Honda CR-V, but it’s a close call.

iPod integration in the Terrain is flawless. This, combined with the upgraded gas 87 sound system, put me in music geek heaven as I crossed state and international borders. Its Bluetooth pairing was simple and effortless, but most manufacturers have perfected this. I found the nav system to be above average, as well. I particularly liked the ability to display navigation cues in the small LCD screen in the gauge cluster, supplementing the map on the touch-screen. That was a good place to see the mileage tick down before a necessary exit or freeway exchange.

Forward gas x ultra strength during pregnancy collision alert and lane departure warning systems were also on my tester. At just $295 as a bundled option on the highest, SLT-2 trim — the only version on which they’re available — they seem like a bargain, especially if you do a lot of bumper-to-bumper driving (for the former) or long stretches using cruise control (for the latter). These systems were introduced electricity fallout 4 just a few years ago on luxury models, and it’s nice to see them available on an affordable model at a very affordable price.

The tough thing for the Terrain — and the Equinox — is where they fit among the competition. They gas news today’re larger on the outside than traditional compact SUVs like the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 but offer less interior and cargo volume. They’re more expensive, too. They’re slightly smaller (but less expensive) than full-size crossovers and SUVs like the Ford Edge and Nissan Murano, both of which can be had with power plants I prefer to GM’s.

But that lack of cargo volume is substantial. I’m glad they don’t call it an SUV, because there isn’t much utility in the Terrain. At 31.6 cubic feet, the cargo area is significantly smaller than the CR-V’s 37.2 cubic electricity wikipedia in hindi feet or the Journey’s 39.6 cubic feet, and it’s just a smidge behind the Edge’s 32.2 cubic feet. The bigger issue with the Terrain is that the cargo area is particularly narrow, so items like golf bags and strollers have a hard time fitting horizontally across the back.

The Terrain was named a Top Safety Pick by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the organization’s highest crash rating. It scored four stars out electricity storage costs of five in the federal government’s overall crash rating. In individual government tests, it earned four stars in frontal crashes, five stars in side-impact tests and a four-star rollover rating.