2020 Dems – sell usa – page 2 – business, finances and investing forum static electricity in the body

###########

re: drastic action: Germany began Energiewende (largest scale experiment in ‘Greening Energy’) in 2010 and has spent ~600 billion dollars transitioning their power generation to ‘Green’ sources. As a result electricity prices have risen 50% and GHG emissions are essentially flat. They pay three times the cost per kwh we do in the US….AND the ludicrous amount of so-called ‘Green gas under a dollar’ power in only made possible because they can electricity video bill nye import power when needed from non-retard neighbor countries (France)…..a luxury the US does not have (at anything approaching the scale needed). Intermittency is a thing.

So I pretty much agree with TS re: action. From a US perspective doing nothing is a pretty attractive option. Again I agree that the only viable alternative to doing nothing is a wholesale push to nuclear and/or focus on conservation. The latter is probably economically viable on it’s own merits if we approach the problem sanely instead of meeting $arbitrary_number set by idiots. Problem with nuclear is it’s decidedly not a tenant of the religion of the Green Dreamers and (most of) the Climate Alarmists in the US; just the inverse actually.

re: drastic action: Germany began Energiewende (largest scale experiment in ‘Greening Energy’) in 2010 and electricity origin has spent ~600 billion dollars transitioning their power generation to ‘Green’ sources. As a result electricity prices have risen 50% and GHG emissions are essentially flat. They pay three times the cost per kwh we do in the US….AND the ludicrous amount of so-called ‘Green’ power in only made possible because they gas monkey monster truck hellcat can import power when needed from non-retard neighbor countries (France)…..a luxury the US does not have (at anything approaching the scale needed). Intermittency is a thing.

People like BoredSocial caught in moral panic (see every electricity facts label other moral panic throughout history – these people should really read books) vote in these policies which waste vast sums of money to achieve absolutely nothing – in fact the opposite of their aims. Imagine what you could do for forest conservation, global hunger and disease, fusion research, etc etc with these hundreds of billions of dollars of pure waste that was spent to achieve absolutely nothing. People like BoredSocial are so bat**** crazy fundamentalist on this topic – mostly whipped up by arts degree journalists holding forth on something they don’t understand for clickbait – that they create these gigantic messes. It’s bizarre.

re: drastic action: Germany began Energiewende (largest scale experiment in ‘Greening Energy’) in 2010 and has spent ~600 billion dollars transitioning their power electricity sources uk generation to ‘Green’ sources. As a result electricity prices have risen 50% and GHG emissions are essentially flat. They pay three times the cost per kwh we do in the US….AND the ludicrous amount of so-called ‘Green’ power in only made possible because gas efficient cars under 10000 they can import power when needed from non-retard neighbor countries (France)…..a luxury the US does not have (at anything approaching the scale needed). Intermittency is a thing.

So I pretty much agree with TS re: action. From a US perspective doing nothing is a pretty attractive option. Again 3 gases in the atmosphere I agree that the only viable alternative to doing nothing is a wholesale push to nuclear and/or focus on conservation. The latter is probably economically viable on it’s own merits if we approach the problem sanely instead of meeting $arbitrary_number set by idiots. Problem with nuclear is it’s decidedly not a tenant of the religion of the Green Dreamers and (most of) the Climate Alarmists in the US; just the inverse actually.

The cost per unit of energy in Germany has actually gone down, but electricity cost per month it has been offset by taxes. This makes sense since it involves a requirement for heavy infrastructure spending, but once built. renewable sources are at cost parity with carbon sources. The high cost also doesn’t hurt business as they are mostly exempt from the taxes being levied.

As for what was discussed here, it’s an open and shut case that arkansas gas tax all suggested mitigations so far are a horrible use of resources that will fail to achieve their aims. Every strand of evidence and science and standard cost-benefit analysis gets you there. Lomborg predicted that 18 years ago and took massive heat for it and he was right – despite trillions wasted, emissions have soared even more than the worst predictions. The experiment has been done. We know the results. Lomborg was correct.

As for reaching people, this forum is irrelevant, so you can rest easy and hop down from your moral panic that someone might electricity measurements units read arguments you don’t like. If I actually cared about that there are 1000 better ways of spreading right wing propaganda than a no-traffic forum. And I don’t need to or care to – insane bigots like yourself are rapidly gas kinetic energy alienating the mainstream, so you’re doing the work for me and I can sit back and watch the mainstream politics of the world swing right. It’s beautiful to watch. Whom the Gods want to destroy, they first send insane. Literally nothing I say matters in comparison to the other side committing comitragic harikari.