A presidential committee on climate security (pccs) is needed now watts up with that gas what i smoke

###########

Congratulations President Trump on having the interest in and courage to ask that the American people be given the benefits of a fact based and unbiased examination of the topic of climate change. Your Presidential Committee on Climate Security (PCCS) holds the first promise of an open, and fact-based examination of the much talked about, but not scientifically quantified electricity outage chicago buzz-word “man-made, dangerous climate change.” Journalists, the media, and many of the scientific community usually drop the qualifier “man-made,” and treat it as a new and alarming phenomenon.

No student of history or of the scientific record denies that the climate changes. It is an indisputable attribute of the phenomenon known as climate that it has and will forever be changing on some time scale at all places on earth. No one knows why the last ice-age began or ended around 10,000 years ago. No one knows why the medieval warm period (950AD-1250AD) began, nor ended and was followed by the little ice age (1300AD-1850AD) …fossil fuels were not in any significant use.

As a graduate engineer and physician, I am attuned to classical youtube gas pedal dance scientific inquiry in attempting to explain physical phenomena. Open inquiry with multiple possible theoretical explanations is essential to determining the valid one, resulting from a process of hypothesis, testing of that hypothesis, and final formation of a theory. That theory is only so good until another one can be formulated with greater predictive accuracy.

The American people are rightly concerned about being good stewards of the environment. They deserve to be reassured that in their daily lives and activities that warnings issued concerning impacts on the climate are based on the scientific method, and not the result of biased motivations based on monetary, reputation electricity 2pm enhancement, or misplaced good intentions

It is of concern that this expected scientific methodology and due process has been largely ignored by those promoting the fear of catastrophic climate change. I recall that Vice President Al Gore would not take questions from his audience when challenged on his claims. The earth did not exhibit a fever as he claimed. Beginning in 1979, satellite data became available and they show cycles of temperature change, with a long period of temperature stability. When verifiable satellite temperature did not show the proclaimed fever, global warming was rebranded with the amorphous term “climate change,” and somehow natural earth rhythms became an aberration. Polar bears have continued to thrive, droughts have come and gone, and pacific islands have not sunk beneath a rising ocean. I recall no publicized series of debates on the merits of a quantifiable change in global climate attributable to human activity. No one has defined the ideal earth climate.

Fast forward to the present. The idea that catastrophic, man-made climate change is factual has become an unassailable point in the media and academia. There has been no open proof of this…yet to question it brings ridicule and threats, but never any validated gas in back and chest scientific proof. There is reference to a vague collection of scientists at the 97% level, but never any explanation of who they are or how that oft repeated number actually came about. Climate change disasters have become the stuff of urban legends, always imminent but never documented, always off in the future. The human remedy to change the climate has never been proved. Faulty climate models and computers portray a runaway climate, but those predictions have not matched the real-world record, which is mostly benign and without ominous trend.

As a physician, I can give electricity bill cost per unit another analogy. Another respected physician refers a patient to me with a serious diagnosis. I prescribe a plan of treatment based on that diagnosis. The patient does not respond and gets worse. Concerned, I refer the patient to another physician and provide the same diagnosis. He looks at my record and tries another therapy for that diagnosis. He sends the patient to another expert in the field, who treats the patient. The patient dies. What went wrong? None of the physicians questioned the original diagnosis, there was a consensus of thought and an appeal to authority which no one dared to question. They all treated gas prices the patient for the wrong disease.

We are not dealing with Normative (I.E. real) Science here. Remember Jerome Ravetz trying to convince us that his so called “Post Normal Science” (really postmodern IMO) was the solution to the corruption of Climategate?. Willis and scientistfortruth disagreed and so do I emphatically.. The problem is that the alleged Climate Science agenda is really PNS in the first place. So Ravetz substitutes “quality” for a search for truth.

I especially appreciated Robert G. Brown’s (rgbatduke), and Rud Istvan’s insights on GCM modeling issues. The GCMs are the Climatariat A team. The Hockey Stick studies are the B team and Steve McIntyre completely demolished them. Steve is a hero in my view. Amazing that someone completely unknown in academia emerges and with a small group of people helping completely upends an entire subdiscipline.

Since that time I’ve tried to trace back how we got into this God-awful mess youtube gas laws. IMO the Principle Godfathers of this agenda, were Maurice Strong, A Canadian whose highest level of formal education was high school; and Crispin Tickell a British diplomat who read history at University according to Nigel Lawson, and who is the younger cousin of Aldous and Julian Huxley.

If instead of a Carbophobia Apocalypse, the Politicians had insisted that it was absolutely urgent to take a Political Position on and prepare for a Biblical Apocalypse, and had lavished bazillions of dollars on the “experts” to study the issue, everyone would have understood what was going on, and it would have been clear that this agenda was in violation of the US 1st amendment. : )

I have been saying exactly the specjalizacja z gastroenterologii same thing on many websites/venues…. How many of those fanatics have sufficient background on science and the Scientific Method to say anything at all… Also to be emphasized is the fact that the climate movement uses ALL of the same propaganda techniques made famous by the Soviets of the early 20th century and Nazi Germany:

‘Total propaganda’ and the art of ‘the Big Lie’ was pioneered by the Bolsheviks. Lenin, after Plekhanov, distinguished between the high-powered propagandist, who devised the strategy, and the low-level agitator, who put it into practice. Where Soviet agitprop led, the Fascists were quick to follow. ‘The (Catholic) church keeps going’, said Dr Goebbels, ‘because it has been repeating the same (message) for two thousand years. The National Socialist Party must do likewise.’ One of the more insidious aspects of propaganda, however, is that true sources of information are hidden geothermal electricity how it works from recipients and propagators alike. This genre of ‘so-called covertly directed propaganda’ aims to mobilize a network of unsuspecting ‘agents of influence’ who pass on the desired message as if they were acting spontaneously. By feigning a coincidence of views with those of the target society, which it seeks to subvert, and by pandering to the proclivities of key individuals, it can suborn a dominate elite of opinion-makers by stealth.

Such, it seems, was the chosen method of Stalin’s propaganda chiefs who spun their webs among the cultural circles of leading Western countries from the 1920s onwards. The chief controller in the field was an apparently harmless German Communist, an erstwhile colleague of Lenin in Switzerland and sometime acquaintance of Dr Goebbels in the Reichstag, Willi Münzenberg (1889-1940). Working alongside Soviet spies, he perfected the art of doing secret business in the open. The ultimate goal has been nicely defined; to create for the right-thinking, non-communist West the dominating political prejudice of the era; the belief that any opinion that happened to serve the Soviet Union was derived from the most essential elements electricity recruitment 2015 of human decency.’

One of the more insidious aspects of propaganda, however, is that true sources of information are hidden from recipients and propagators alike. This genre of ‘so-called covertly directed propaganda’ aims to mobilize a network of unsuspecting ‘agents of influence’ who pass on the desired message as if they were acting spontaneously. By feigning a coincidence of views with those of the target society, which it seeks to subvert, and by pandering to the proclivities of key individuals, it can suborn a dominate elite of opinion-makers by stealth.

Such, it seems, was the chosen method of Stalin’s propaganda chiefs who spun their webs among the cultural circles of leading Western countries from the 1920s onwards. The chief controller in the field gas mask bong how to use was an apparently harmless German Communist, an erstwhile colleague of Lenin in Switzerland and sometime acquaintance of Dr Goebbels in the Reichstag, Willi Münzenberg (1889-1940). Working alongside Soviet spies, he perfected the art of doing secret business in the open. The ultimate goal has been nicely defined; to create for the right-thinking, non-communist West the dominating political prejudice of the era; the belief that any opinion that happened to serve the Soviet Union was derived from the most essential elements of human decency.’