## Absolute zero v. the speed of light physics forums static electricity review worksheet

##############

I agree that discerning the differences between objects frozen and objects accelerated may dip into engineering a bit, but it is also relativity related as one of the primary principles of relativity is that if you remove reference points, determining whether an object is moving toward you or you are moving toward the object is impossible, or at least irrelevant. This question goes to the heart of the same thing, if you gas in oil causes remove the reference point of freezing or moving near the speed of light, how can you discern that an object has been moving electricity el paso apartments near the speed of light when compared to a deeply frozen object.

Going to your comment Russ about the clock would not be impacted by near zero temperatures, are there any studies to show this? The components of the clock would most certainly be impacted. Electricity is impacted by an number of things. What e85 gas stations in ohio I am trying to sort out here is how you can show that at object moving near the speed of light is being impacted by Einsteinian relativity and not another force, perhaps one unaccounted for.

It’s a no-no to question theories? Dark matter, anti-matter, spooky action, these are all concepts created to account for physics that we do not entirely understand. Relativity cannot account for everything, that’s why String Theory exists. But a basic scientific fact is that one of the theories may be true, but neither has to be. Questioning theories is absolutely necessary for science. Were it not, we would gas vs electric water heater cost per year still be living in a world of Phlogistons.

Part of the main point of all this is what is time relative to the ‘real’ world. We measure time through the change in the state of objects such as movement and decay. If Relativity states that an object on Earth would have an X rate of decay over 100 years and an object which leaves the Earth for 100 years and returns would have a Y rate of decay. If the rate of decay can be nullified through freezing to near absolute temperatures, such that the object that remained on Earth has la gas prices now an near identical rate of decay to the rate for the object that left Earth,what grade 9 electricity review is left to show that freezing is different from acceleration to near the speed of light. I’m not doubting that there is a difference, I’m simply asking how we can show that difference.

It’s a no-no to question theories? Dark matter, anti-matter, spooky action, these are all concepts created to account for physics that we do not entirely understand. Relativity cannot account for everything, that’s why String Theory exists. But a basic scientific fact is that one of the theories may be true, but neither has to be. Questioning theories is absolutely necessary for science. Were it not, we would still be living in a world gas 76 station of Phlogistons.

Part of the main point of all this is what is time relative to the ‘real’ world. We measure time through the change in the state of objects such as movement and decay. If Relativity states that an object on Earth would have an X rate of decay over 100 gas 78 years and an object which leaves the Earth for 100 years and returns would have a Y rate of decay. If the rate of decay can be nullified through freezing to near absolute temperatures, such that the object that remained on Earth has an near identical rate of decay to the rate for the object that left Earth,what is left to show that freezing is different from acceleration to near the speed of light. I’m not doubting that there is a difference, I’m simply asking how we can show that difference.

I agree that discerning the differences basic electricity quizlet between objects frozen and objects accelerated may dip into engineering a bit, but it is also relativity related as one of the primary principles of relativity is that if you remove reference points, determining whether an object is moving toward you or you are moving toward the object is impossible electricity storage association, or at least irrelevant. This question goes to the heart of the same thing, if you remove the reference point of freezing or moving near the speed of light, how can you discern that an object has been moving near the speed of light when compared to a deeply frozen object.

Going to your comment Russ about the clock would not be impacted by near zero temperatures, are there any studies to show this? The components of the clock would most certainly be impacted. Electricity is impacted by an number of things. What I am trying to sort out u gas station near me here is how you can show that at object moving near the speed of light is being impacted by Einsteinian relativity and not another force, perhaps one unaccounted for.