After vc summer, what’s in south carolina’s energy future cover stories gas density calculator


Carter, the former president and CEO of Santee Cooper, the state-owned energy provider, offered that prediction on July 31, 2017, following the utility’s announcement that they were pulling out of the partnership with South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. to build two energy-generating nuclear reactors in Fairfield County at the V.C. a gas station near me Summer Nuclear Station.

With Carter at the helm, Santee Cooper had been part of the project since 2008. Continually mounting costs as well as what Carter called an “illusion” of a completion schedule forced the state-run utility to put its nuclear ambitions aside. Other fundamental issues with the project have since come into focus, including the fact that the reactors’ designer used unlicensed engineers to finalize some blueprints, and that the utilities had long known the project was in trouble.

Now the incomplete nuclear reactors are tombstones. gas x extra strength vs ultra strength But they also might stand as a monument to the Waterloo of nuclear energy in South Carolina. Calls by some political leaders to resurrect the Fairfield reactors at some future point seem to be fading as SCE&G parent company SCANA — and its possible buyer, Dominion — as well as Santee Cooper appear content to let the site rust.

With the future of nuclear energy in South Carolina apparently entering into stasis, what sources will take the place of the collision of atoms? Will the failure of the V.C. Summer reactors usher South Carolina into an age of renewable energy, or will the state be pushed deeper into dependence on fossil fuels? And could nuclear rise from the grave?

When SCE&G and Santee Cooper put shovels in the dirt in Fairfield County in 2013, it was the first nuclear reactor project to break ground in the U.S. since 1977. electricity generation definition Along with an amicable political climate toward nuclear energy around the late aughts, a new construction model known as modular construction was supposed to ease the financial burden of building atomic power plants. But that means of construction failed to bring down costs as expected over the course of V.C. Summer.

“You have to look at the economics,” says Travis Knight, a professor of nuclear and mechanical engineering at the University of South Carolina. “It make sense that you got that investment [in operating nuclear reactors] paid for. … Smaller investment to replace components and maintain [facilities] is usually seen very favorably. The plants now that are paid for, let’s be honest, they’re cash cows.”

Guild believes the plants we have now meet the state’s energy demands and will continue to do so. inert gas definition chemistry He says any growth in demand should first be met through more efficient electrical consumption rather than building new energy-making facilities. Utilities can do this by providing incentives for commercial or residential consumer to make their businesses or homes more energy efficient. An energy provider could also give its customers more efficient technologies or help pay for them. electricity merit badge worksheet This practice is called demand-side management.

What Guild and Knight agree on is that any investment in South Carolina’s energy future is going to take a solid energy policy set forth by lawmakers and regulators. That’s bad news for the Palmetto State — news that trickles down from the feds, says Conor Harrison, an assistant professor of economic geography at USC. grade 9 electricity unit test He studies the development of electricity supply systems in the Southern U.S. as well as other energy topics such as renewables.

“There’s no plan really on how to move forward that comes from the political realm,” Harrison says. “There’s no energy policy. … What we get in its absence is that the utilities are driving the ship. So the energy policy is what’s best for the utilities and their bottom line in the short and long term. I think, particularly in the Southeast, utilities are very comfortable with the state of affairs that come out of the Legislature.”

In a recent report, Santee Cooper says it can meet demand for energy up to 2031, and will do so by firing up a dormant coal power plant. electricity research centre And even if Dominion Energy, a company looking to take over SCE&G, isn’t talking about restarting the 2,000-megawatt V.C. Summer nuclear project, they say they’ll make up for that generation with natural gas.

“One of the most broadly supported sayings in politics is that people like ‘clean energy,’” Harrison says, conceding that the term ‘clean energy’ is debated. “People want it and are interested in it socially. But I think what’s not there for a lot of people — few people feel they have an avenue toward actually influencing the way these things are decided upon.”

2007 — The Base Load Review Act passes the General Assembly. Without a signature or veto from then-Gov. Mark Sanford, the bill becomes law [corrected]. gas oil ratio chainsaw The law allowed SCE&G to charge customers up front in order to finance the two new nuclear reactors at the V.C Summer site. Utilities had historically financed power plants by selling bonds that were repaid by ratepayers after the facility started providing electricity.

2017 — S#!t hits the fan. In March, Westinghouse, former lead contractor and designer of the reactors, files for bankruptcy. In April, SCE&G executives tell state regulators the reactors could still be completed by 2021 at the latest. Then in July, Santee Cooper announces it is pulling out of nuclear project, calling the completion schedule an “illusion.” SCE&G halts construction. Throughout the rest of the year, it is revealed that the two utilities knew that the project was in severe trouble and might not be completed. In the end, estimates say it would have cost well over $20 billion to complete and was up to six years behind schedule.