Ah cliches crisis driven innovation alternate history discussion gas utility

#########

Without war, the classic ‘u-boat’ was fully developed and matured by 1914. As you can see, 20 years of development went into structural improvements following war experience gas constant for air to increase diving depth from 164ft to 750ft. Why? Because concealment as a defense wasn’t enough, great depth was required too. The second war showed that great speed at depth was also required and thus the Elektro Boot was required. However, the high speed submarine had been developed in WW1 by the RN – the R class submarine from completely different requirements ie. to ambush submarines.

The military mind can also work things out for itself without war. The RN is an example, most of the ships required over the 1920’s and 1930’s had been scoped or prototyped prior to WW1, suggesting that they didn’t need war experience electricity physics formulas to develop. The Lightfoot class leader of 1913-14 was seen as the right size for all future destroyers because it had the required endurance to stay with the fleet for 3-4 day sorties and sea-keeping. It’s the same tonnage and dimensions as the later Scott class leader that provided the prototype of most Destroyers built in the 1920s and 30’s in many navies.

Without war, the classic ‘u-boat’ was fully developed and matured by 1914. As you can see, 20 years of development went into structural improvements following war experience to increase a gas has diving depth from 164ft to 750ft. Why? Because concealment as a defense wasn’t enough, great depth was required too. The second war showed that great speed at depth was also required and thus the Elektro Boot was required. However, the high speed submarine had been developed in WW1 by the RN – the R class submarine from completely different requirements ie. to ambush submarines.

The military mind can also work things out for itself without war. The RN is an example, most of the ships required over the 1920 electricity in indian villages’s and 1930’s had been scoped or prototyped prior to WW1, suggesting that they didn’t need war experience to develop. The Lightfoot class leader of 1913-14 was seen as the right size for all future destroyers because it had the required endurance to stay with the fleet for 3-4 day sorties and sea-keeping. It’s the same tonnage k electric bill and dimensions as the later Scott class leader that provided the prototype of most Destroyers built in the 1920s and 30’s in many navies.

Click to expand…Nobody here ever says that we need crises like wars or economic collapses to drive innovations, just that they are a drive for innovation. There is never a single drive for innovation and technological development, after all. You make it sound almost like people here electricity trading jobs say that technology can only develop during wars, which simply isn’t the case.

I’m not even going to talk about the renewable energy thing because I’m not an expert on that, but regarding jet engines – before WW2, jets were fully experimental and were limited to a few early designs which could barely take gas tax by state off the ground, while during the six years of the war, they were turned into practical mass-produced equipment which would become a stable of aircraft mere years after the war was over. Under natural peacetime development, it would have certainly not advanced as quickly – and that’s what wars and crises usually do. Not necessarily create new technology, but bring it out of obscurity and into mass popularity.