Alexandria ocasio-cortez says labor shouldn’t have to fear automation – slashdot gasoline p


It’s impossible to discuss the seismic shift toward automation without a conversation about job loss. Opponents of these technologies criticize a displacement that could someday result in wide-scale unemployment among what is often considered unskilled roles. Advocates, meanwhile, tend to suggest that reports of that nature tend to be overstated. Workforces shift, as they have done for time immemorial. During a conversation at SXSW this week, New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez offered gas 85 another take entirely.

We should not be haunted by the specter of being automated out of work, she said in an answer reported by The Verge. We should be excited by that. But the reason we’re not excited by it is because we live in a society where if you don’t have a job, you are left to die. And that is, at its core, our problem… We should be excited about automation, because what it could potentially mean is more time educating ourselves, more time creating art, more time investing in and investigating the sciences, more time focused on invention, more time going to space, more time enjoying the world that we live in, The Verge quoted Ocasio-Cortez as saying. Because gas oil ratio 50 to 1 not all creativity needs to be bonded by wage.

Science fiction writer William Gibson called her comments shockingly intelligent for a politician. Fast Company adds that robots have put half a million people out of work in the United States, and researchers estimate that bots could take 800 million jobs by 2030 — then quotes Ocasio-Cortez’s assessment of the unfair state 4 gas giants of labor today.

No, but assuming that the productivity of other job positions around that person also improved about 50 times, the real value of their labor increased as a result of everything else being less expensive to produce. The amount of dollars you earn is utterly irrelevant when you fail to consider what you can purchase with them. Despite all of the people claiming the middle class is being destroyed, real median income [] has been slowly rising.

Automation is never going to significantly improve the wages of the people employing it in and of itself. The only possible way that can happen is if they are the only ones in possession of the improvements and no one else is capable of replicating those techniques and the workers impact of electricity in the 1920s can’t be replaced by someone else who will accept less pay. As soon as anyone else figures out how to get the same improvements, competition drives prices back down. There’s additional money to be made in the short term while that process occurs, but a rank and file worker isn’t going to become extremely wealthy unless they own their own their own business.

Some people like to call this process a race to the bottom, but they only tortugas ninjas look at it from the perspective of the people racing downward. Everyone who’s not involved in that particular race is the beneficiary of less expensive goods and services. As all industries undergo this continually (everyone is busy running in their own separate race) it produces more wealth. You can grumble that it isn’t equally shared, but it’s largely inconsequential.

A value added tax to fund gas monkey cast a UBI/Universal Basic Services is another approach and one harder to circumvent with tax or production location loopholes. Say you wanted to implement a UBI of 12k per person per year for adults. That’s roughly 3 trillion per year in the US given 250 million on the payroll. Projected US population [] and projected GDP [] show that the GDP is outpacing population growth by a large margin. Even if you take inflation into account, the price of goods and services is dropping as automation takes over. You can save money by cancelling other welfare programs, and all that cash would trickle up into the economy as well which has positive benefits. These alone could make a meager straight UBI doable in a 20-40 year timeframe, maybe even 12k/year, if the population and GDP keep growing roughly as expected.

Wait… won’t automation and Weak AI/AI bring down the costs of goods and services? What would people absolutely have to spend that money on? Housing? Food? Child care? Education? Healthcare? Access to information? Given the lower future tgas advisors costs it may be best to give out 500 dollars today’s equivelant per month and offer free basic housing around the nation, free basic food, free child care, free education, free healthcare c gastronomie brignais, and free basic internet access. The costs of all of these could go quite low in the future and a regulated non profit market like Germany has health insurance or a government run solution could be quite efficient with low overhead if done right. That way the most needy benefit the most with the basic services, and everyone is lifted by the basic income while reasonably well off people will forgo their basic services and pay for better ones.

OTOH I’ve got folks on the right who tell me they’ll be new jobs but nobody’ll say what those jobs are. Occasionally somebody will say Bio-Tech, which is what I heard in the 90s. Or they list a bunch of service jobs nobody will be able to afford when they lose their find a gas station close to me jobs. Meanwhile the President of the United States is a climate change denier. And one way we know climate change is real is that it’s been called out in SEC filings. You can lie to Congress, you can lie to your Priest, hell, you can even lie to yourself, but you do not lie to the SEC…

And don’t get me started on the Evangelicals that make up the second wing of the GOP (the first being the wealthy plutocrats). There’s a lot that wouldn’t know reality if it bit ’em on the rear. They’re still arguing that Evolution isn’t a thing and that The Flood happened. I know it’s not nice to call folks out for religious beliefs, but wrong is wrong, and I draw the line when they electricity lesson plans middle school start trying to sneak it into schools and into laws, which they’ve been doing for ages (Abortion bans anyone?)