Althouse you know what democrats are going to say if they don’t win the house hp gas online booking

###########

Do the Righties have nutjobs? Sure, lots of ’em. But, almost all of them live in trailers parks in places like East Bumfuck, Georgia, while on the Left they sit in endowed chairs at major universities. electricity song 2015 You think I’m kidding? Okay, then go do this exercise. Pick a major university or two & track down its graduate reading list for Women’s Studies. In that reading list, it will not be outlier assumptions that all hertero-sex is rape & every "authentic" woman must be lesbian. It’ll be mainstream. Liberal Women outside of the academy will go on pretending that feminism is about jobs, reproductive choice, blah, blah, blah, like nothing has changed since Betsy Friedan. But what our nations finest schools are cranking out year after year on the taxpayers’ dollar are lesbian nutjobs.

Second, those are views you might find in some women’s studies departments, but they certainly are not pervasive. Hang out in a history department, in a philosophy department, in a political science department, etc., etc. static electricity in the body You will find a broad range of views, albeit a broad range centered on the moderate left. (You will definitely find conservatives and libertarians in those departments as well.)

Third, you can definitely find right-wing nut jobs on campus. There are plenty of them in economics departments and in business schools. (They certainly aren’t the majority in either place, but as long as we’re playing find-the-outlier…) It amazes me that some of those b-school people are respected by anyone. And holy moly are some of the people in computer science departments right-wing, end-of-days, I-think-I-could-survive-in-a-night-watchman-state crazy.

Finally, you can find plenty of right-wing nut jobs off campus without going to the woods. While I think there are plenty of good ideas and smart people at the NRA (in suburban DC, if I remember right), that place is chock goddamned full of idiots and nut jobs who cannot reason half as well to their own positions as I can, despite my not spending all my working hours there. Or take a listen to right wing media. Alex Jones is enough to end this debate.

But the full real story with respect to the Congressional elections will not be told until a couple decades from now, when old and retired former campaign honchos with a conscience finally admit, before dying, how well the tricks worked in the ten or so races that could have gone either way if there were no cheating and no lies. That is, in the Congressional elections that were stolen.

He knew he (more accurately, the people funding him) had stolen that Minnesota Senate seat. I am no big fan of Feingold, but Feingold ran an honest campaign and lost to a dishonest campaign. Franken knew that, and giving his seat to another Democrat was an easier salve to his conscience than admitting he had betrayed the public trust and stolen an election.

And, years from now, when this November is history, there will be historians writing books, based on the repentant confessions of old people who had stolen elections back in the day, and we will have a better idea of why, in 2018, the number of Democrat pickups was as high as it was, or low as it was, and that is something we will not know tomorrow, or Wednesday.

All I am saying – and I am not being anti-Democrat here, they used to represent the working poor and so they got good at street-level politics – all I am saying is that most of us think the factor of cheating is about one to two percent and, in years like this where the difference between Chairman Pelosi and Chairman Barletta is about one or two in a hundred votes, nationwide – and focused on 40 races, with about 10 of them in districts with a long history of election cheating – then cheating is key.

Second, those are views you might find in some women’s studies departments, but they certainly are not pervasive. Hang out in a history department, in a philosophy department, in a political science department, etc., etc. electricity 2015 You will find a broad range of views, albeit a broad range centered on the moderate left. (You will definitely find conservatives and libertarians in those departments as well.)

Now, onto your specific points. Who really cares what most those "moderate Lefty" humanities guys think? Not the modern Left, in any case. Like what, there’s active strains of e.g. Neo-Kantian morality on the Modern Left? C’mon! Most of the stuff you mention is historical scholarship, and, while I certainly think it’s worthwhile, it’s certainly not relevant, especially to the modern Left & by their own admission.

As for these "moderates", please tell us how many of them have spoken against Antifa shutting down conservative after conservative who sought to speak on campuses? Who has come out in support of someone as anodyne as Jordan Peterson against the Canadian State Thought Police? No, these academics are simply part of the Democratic Party machine, and they, too, whitewash the insanity within their ranks by their silence.

As for Alex Jones, you may notice he just got shut down in a serial coup by a group of corporations who just together & silenced a voice they didn’t like. I’m not fond of Jones, but I’m less fond of corporate bullies. electricity billy elliot Especially, when those bullies find no problem with guys like Farrakhan who thinks because I’m white that my ancestors were invented by an evil mad scientist on Crete, & yet somehow he’s still on Twitter, Facebook, & noshes with multiple Democratic Presidents.

Second, those are views you might find in some women’s studies departments, but they certainly are not pervasive. Hang out in a history department, in a philosophy department, in a political science department, etc., etc. You will find a broad range of views, albeit a broad range centered on the moderate left. (You will definitely find conservatives and libertarians in those departments as well.)

Now, onto your specific points. Who really cares what most those "moderate Lefty" humanities guys think? Not the modern Left, in any case. Like what, there’s active strains of e.g. Neo-Kantian morality on the Modern Left? C’mon! Most of the stuff you mention is historical scholarship, and, while I certainly think it’s worthwhile, it’s certainly not relevant, especially to the modern Left & by their own admission.

As for these "moderates", please tell us how many of them have spoken against Antifa shutting down conservative after conservative who sought to speak on campuses? Who has come out in support of someone as anodyne as Jordan Peterson against the Canadian State Thought Police? No, these academics are simply part of the Democratic Party machine, and they, too, whitewash the insanity within their ranks by their silence.

As for Alex Jones, you may notice he just got shut down in a serial coup by a group of corporations who just together & silenced a voice they didn’t like. I’m not fond of Jones, but I’m less fond of corporate bullies. Especially, when those bullies find no problem with guys like Farrakhan who thinks because I’m white that my ancestors were invented by an evil mad scientist on Crete, & yet somehow he’s still on Twitter, Facebook, & noshes with multiple Democratic Presidents.

Ha! The classic change-the-subject move. You claimed something about where the left’s nutsos dominate. I gave you lots of reasons to think that claim was wrong. grade 9 static electricity quiz You abandoned that claim, and in doing so also claimed to be right. Cute! When you go from younghegelian to youngadulthegelian and then full-fledgedhegelian I think you’ll appreciate what has happened here!