Arizona corporation commission electricity joules


PHOENIX — The Arizona Corporation Commission today convened the second day of its monthly Open Meeting followed by a Staff Meeting to discuss and vote on various water, electric, railroad, and tax reform agenda items. Here is a brief recap of the meeting highlights: Valley Utilities Water Company, Inc. application to comply with Tax Act approved

Valley Utilities Water Company, Inc. made a compliance filing stating that existing rates and related electricity equations physics revenues were approved based on a 15 percent federal corporate income tax rate, which is lower than the 21 percent rate under the new Tax Act. The company states that implementation of the Tax Act rate of 21 percent could increase its authorized revenue requirement and that the regulatory expense of filing and processing a request for additional revenue could exceed the gas jet size chart benefits of such a filing and therefore the company does not intend to file an application for a tax adjustor mechanism.

Commissioners voted on the water company’s rate case today approving an increase for the typical residential bill for a 5/8 x 3/4-inch meter, with a median usage of 2,910 gallons, from $23.64 to $33.59, excluding the interim emergency surcharge, for an increase of $9.95 or 42.10 percent. Considering the now-expired interim emergency surcharge, the net additional increase would be $1.74 or 5.47 percent, from $31.85 to $33.59.

Today’s decision also orders the water company to resolve several plant deficiencies requiring correction, the adoption of an Emergency Water Augmentation Surcharge Tariff for the company to recover costs incurred for water purchases when it experiences an emergency water shortage, and approved a Purchased Power Adjustor Mechanism to pass through increases or decreases due to changes in the rates electricity names superheroes charged for purchased power through a surcharge on customer bills.

Commissioners narrowly voted to approve Johnson Utilities, LLC’s request to withdraw its rate application. In a 3-2 vote, Commissioners approved a Recommended Order which orders Johnson, through its interim manager EPCOR, to file a new full rate case application no later than May 1, 2020. The company is to use a test year ending between August 31 and December 31, 2019, unless EPCOR can demonstrate to staff cause for a test year with an earlier end date.

For Phase II, APS seeks to refund an additional $86.5 million of tax savings resulting from the federal Tax Act on its Excess Deferred Income Taxes. APS plans to refund this savings over an accelerated twelve-month period. The bill impact for residential customers will be a credit of $0.003048 per kWh, resulting in a bill decrease of approximately $3.35 for a residential customer using 1,100 kWh per month. APS proposes to combine these two bill credits as a single item on customers monthly bills, resulting in a bill credit of $0.007242 per kWh over the twelve-month period. The combined monthly gas tax in ct bill credit will result in an approximate $2.55 bill decrease for a residential customer with an average monthly consumption of 1,100 kWh.

Commissioners unanimously voted to eliminate an outdated mailing practice following the Corporation Commission’s expansion of eFiling services. As part of the new eFiling system, it is now possible for any person to register for an account through astrid y gaston lima reservations which the person can choose to follow any docket in which the person is interested. After opting to follow a docket, the person receives an email, with a link to the filing, each time a filing is made in the docket. This includes viewing a related agenda through the online system. Learn how to register for an account on our How to follow a docket page: Corporation Commission moves forward with ASU partnership

Commissioner Sandra D. Kennedy in February docketed a letter requesting that the Corporation Commission investigate the possible use of a modeling tool developed by Arizona State University (ASU). According to Commissioner Kennedy’s letter, ASU President Michael Crow has agreed to donate this modeling tool to the Corporation Commission at no cost. The tool models and evaluates the integration of various types of electric power generating sources at different levels into the Arizona energy grid. This could be helpful in analyzing gas 47 cents and determining how the grid could handle the phasing-in of more renewable energy sources, as well as the retirement of various coal and natural gas-fired facilities. The modeling tool would be useful to the Corporation Commission during its Integrated Resource Planning process and its evaluation of Investor Owned Utilities proposals.