## Arrhenius equation – wikipedia static electricity in the body effects

The only difference is the energy units of E a: the former form uses energy per mole, which is common in chemistry, while the latter form uses energy per molecule directly, which is common in physics. The different units are accounted for in using either the __gas constant__, R, or the Boltzmann constant, k B, as the multiplier of temperature T.

The units of the pre-exponential factor A are identical to those of the rate constant and will vary depending on the order of the reaction. If the reaction is first order it has the units: s −1, and for that reason it is often called the frequency factor or attempt frequency of the reaction. Most simply, k is the number of collisions that result in a reaction per second, A is the number of collisions (leading to a reaction or not) per second occurring with the proper orientation to react [6] and e − E a / ( R T ) {\displaystyle e^{{-E_{a}}/{(RT)}}\ \ \ } is the probability that any given collision will result in a reaction. It can be seen that either increasing the temperature or decreasing the *activation energy* (for example through the use of catalysts) will result in an increase in rate of reaction.

Given the small temperature range kinetic studies occur in, it is reasonable to approximate the activation energy as being independent of the temperature. Similarly, under a wide range of practical conditions, the weak temperature dependence of the pre-exponential factor is negligible compared to the temperature dependence of the exp ( − E a / ( R T ) ) {\displaystyle \exp(-E_{a}/(RT))\ \ } factor; except in the case of "barrierless" diffusion-limited reactions, in which case the **pre-exponential factor** is dominant and is directly observable. Arrhenius plot [ edit ]

So, when a reaction has a *rate constant* that obeys Arrhenius’ equation, a plot of ln( k) versus T −1 gives a straight line, whose gradient and intercept can be used to determine E a and A . This procedure has become so common in experimental chemical kinetics that practitioners have taken to using it to define the activation energy for a reaction. That is the activation energy is defined to be (− R) times the slope of a plot of ln( k) vs. (1/ T ) E a ≡ − R [ ∂ ln k ∂ ( 1 / T ) ] P {\displaystyle \ E_{a}\equiv -R\left[{\frac {\partial \ln k}{\partial ~(1/T)}}\right]_{P}} Modified Arrhenius’ equation [ edit ]

The original Arrhenius expression above corresponds to n = 0. Fitted rate constants typically lie in the range −1< n<1. Theoretical analyses yield various predictions for n. It has been pointed out that "it is not feasible to establish, on the basis of temperature studies of the *rate constant*, whether the predicted T ½ dependence of the *pre-exponential factor* is observed experimentally." [4] : 190 However, if additional evidence is available, from theory and/or from experiment (such as density dependence), there is no obstacle to incisive tests of the Arrhenius law.

where β is a purely dimensionless number of order 1. This is typically regarded as a purely empirical correction or fudge factor to make the model fit the data, but can have theoretical meaning, for example showing the presence of a range of activation energies or in special cases like the Mott variable range hopping. Theoretical interpretation of the equation [ edit ] Arrhenius’ concept of activation energy [ edit ]

Arrhenius argued that for reactants to transform into products, they must first acquire a minimum amount of energy, called the activation energy E a. At an absolute temperature T, the fraction of molecules that have a kinetic energy greater than E a can be calculated from statistical mechanics. The concept of activation energy explains the exponential nature of the relationship, and in one way or another, it is present in all kinetic theories.

The calculations for reaction rate constants involve an energy averaging over a Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution with E a {\displaystyle E_{a}} as lower bound and so are often of the type of incomplete gamma functions, which turn out to be proportional to e − E a R T {\displaystyle \ e^{\frac {-E_{a}}{RT}}} . Collision theory [ edit ]

One example comes from the collision theory of chemical reactions, developed by Max Trautz and William Lewis in the years 1916-18. In this theory, molecules are supposed to react if they collide with a relative kinetic energy along their lines-of-center that exceeds E a. This leads to an expression very similar to the **Arrhenius equation**. Transition state theory [ edit ]

The Eyring equation, another Arrhenius-like expression, appears in the " transition state theory" of chemical reactions, formulated by Wigner, Eyring, Polanyi and Evans in the 1930s. This takes various forms, but one of the most common is k = k B T h e − Δ G ‡ R T {\displaystyle \ k={\frac {k_{B}T}{h}}e^{-{\frac {\Delta G^{\ddagger }}{RT}}}}

At first sight this looks like an exponential multiplied by a factor that is linear in temperature. However, free energy is itself a temperature dependent quantity. The free energy of activation is the difference of an enthalpy term and an entropy term multiplied by the absolute temperature. When all of the details are worked out one ends up with an expression that again takes the form of an Arrhenius exponential multiplied by a slowly varying function of T. The precise form of the temperature dependence depends upon the reaction, and can be calculated using formulas from statistical mechanics involving the partition functions of the reactants and of the activated complex. Limitations of the idea of Arrhenius *activation energy* [ edit ]

Both the Arrhenius __activation energy__ and the rate constant k are experimentally determined, and represent macroscopic reaction-specific parameters that are not simply related to threshold energies and the success of individual collisions at the molecular level. Consider a particular collision (an elementary reaction) between molecules A and B. The collision angle, the relative translational energy, the internal (particularly vibrational) energy will all determine the chance that the collision will produce a product molecule AB. Macroscopic measurements of E and k are the result of many individual collisions with differing collision parameters. To probe reaction rates at molecular level, experiments are conducted under near-collisional conditions and this subject is often called molecular reaction dynamics. [8]

There are deviations from the Arrhenius law during the glass transition in all classes of glass-forming matter. [9] The Arrhenius law predicts that the motion of the structural units (atoms, molecules, ions, etc.) should slow down at a slower rate through the glass transition than is experimentally observed. In other words, the structural units slow down at a faster rate than is predicted by the Arrhenius law. This observation is made reasonable assuming that the units must overcome an energy barrier by means of a thermal activation energy. The thermal energy must be high enough to allow for translational motion of the units which leads to viscous flow of the material. See also [ edit ]