Boulder drops bid for key xcel assets in new $200m-plus utility plan – boulder daily camera

When the PUC partially dismissed Boulder’s original application, it ruled that Boulder cannot acquire Xcel facilities that exclusively serve customers outside city limits. Eur j gastroenterology hepatology impact factor The city also cannot force Xcel to share its facilities, the commission said.

Boulder now awaits the commission’s decision on the supplement, which is expected to arrive between 210 and 300 days from the time the application is accepted. Gas you up After the PUC issues a ruling, Boulder would file for condemnation of certain Xcel property, hoping to take possession in 2018.

The city originally sought to acquire all or portions of nine substations that serve the city and the 115kV transmission loop serving Boulder, as well as related facilities, equipment and lines.

“The difference in the two filings is really pretty dramatic,” said Debra Kalish, senior assistant city attorney, and Boulder’s representative before the PUC. Electricity in india travel “Whereas with the first one we said we want everything within the acquisition area, in this filing we’re not taking anything that’s used exclusively to serve Xcel customers.”

Of course, accommodating that new approach will require considerable construction. Electricity and magnetism worksheets high school Boulder is now planning for an estimated $53 million in construction-related spending over a two-to-three-year period starting no sooner than January 2018.

That money would cover infrastructure investments Boulder already had accounted for in long-term capital budgeting, but it also represents a nearly tenfold increase over the $5 million in construction costs identified in the original application.

“We certainly get that when you talk about a $5 million separation plan versus a $53 million separation plan, there’s quite a few million in between those numbers,” Huntley said, “but the fact of the matter is you’re always talking about millions” in this particular and very expensive world.

The city anticipates bringing in a “significant amount of revenue” to cover construction debt, and believes it can offer rates equal to or better than Xcel’s on Day 1, Huntley added.

About a third of the $53 million spent on construction would take place at existing substations. Hp gas online booking mobile number Elsewhere, no new buildings would go up, and no new lines would be installed above ground. Gas prices going up in nj Boulder proposes to share poles with Xcel, which would remain under the company’s ownership during any potential joint use.

“The visual impact to the city — there shouldn’t be any, at the end of the day. Electricity for kids That was the goal,” said Heather Bailey, director of Boulder’s Energy Future office.

The plan filed Wednesday is informed largely by data transferred from Xcel to Boulder in May, as part of a discovery agreement following the PUC’s application dismissal last year.

The new data has never been made available to the public, pursuant to the USA Patriot Act, which regards utilities and their distribution systems as vulnerable terrorist targets. 4 gas laws But, officials have said, the data included more specific local modeling of Xcel’s system than Boulder had ever seen before.

Where once it was planning based off assumptions and comparisons with peer cities, Boulder now says its understanding of what, exactly, is required in the municipalization process is much more solid.

“Before, we never had the model,” Bailey said. Gas zone edenvale “What’s critical about that is you can design the engineering based on how you assume things work, but until you know the system … Gas 76 you really don’t know if you’ve achieved your reliability targets.”

Boulder believes it would likely need to spend between $150 million and $214 million on condemnation, should that process move forward. Electricity quizlet The estimate there is comparable to that offered in Boulder’s last application to the PUC.

The debt-funded condemnation proceedings, combined with debt-funded construction costs, could total as much as $267 million under current city estimates.

Even if Boulder does move forward with its planned transition away from Xcel, it hopes to lease the Xcel electric facilities it acquires back to the utility immediately following the hand-off.

“The way we’ve proposed it,” Regional Sustainability Coordinator Jonathan Koehn said, “is that we’d be able to step off and develop a 5-year wholesale contract with Xcel. 1 electricity unit is equal to how many kwh … Electricity 220 volts wiring We want to do it in a way that’s mutually agreeable.”

Koehn added that Boulder — which expects about 70 percent of ongoing costs for the theoretical utility would be related to power supply — would spend those five years building out its own local generation assets.

In a brief interview after the city’s filing, Xcel spokeswoman Michelle Aguayo said the company could not comment on that proposal, nor on the joint use of power poles or any other specifics of the application.

“I can’t directly address what’s in the plan because we haven’t seen it,” Aguayo said, “but I can tell you that our objectives are the same as when Boulder initially filed its plan last year: We are focused on a plan that provides complete separation, ensuring safe and reliable service for both Boulder customers and the rest of our statewide system.”

Boulder’s City Council will meet for two closed-door sessions in coming weeks to discuss negotiation with Xcel. J gastroenterology impact factor The first of the pair is a day-long session Oct. 7 gas station 5.

“Now is a key time in the settlement process,” Aguayo said, “and we look forward to Boulder’s decision in October to determine if we are able to reach an agreement, or if the city desires to continue with municipalization instead.”

“We anticipate having additional information about the city’s position on settlement in the upcoming month,” she said, in the most specific public-facing comment the city has made on settlement timing since the negotiations were announced in June.

The council cannot take action on a settlement in executive session, though, so any potential agreement would receive due public process during regular council meetings.

Meanwhile, the voter-approved Utility Occupation Tax that’s funded the Energy Future office to the tune of about $2 million annually expires next year.