Clean coders library electricity generation by country

##########

That’s right, in this episode (after a brief diversion through wave/particle duality) Uncle Bob takes on the dreaded Liskov Substitution Principle. electricity flow diagram He’ll tell you all about the history of the theory of types, including Russell’s paradox, and Turing’s revelations. He’ll show how this theory influenced early computer languages like Algol, Fortran, Cobol, and even C++.

Then he’ll dive into the favorite old conundrum of the squares and rectangles, and he’ll show that inheritance is not what it appears to be, and certainly not what you have been told it is. He’ll teach you about the Principle of Representatives and the implications it has for sub-typing and inheritance. And you Ruby programmers won’t get off scott free either! He’s got plenty to say to you about subtypes in dynamic languages.

Then, true to form, Uncle Bob will present a case study of a subtle LSP failure, and the horrific consequences it causes. You won’t want to miss this part. By the time he’s done you’ll be hunting all through your code trying to find and repair potential LSP violations in order to prevent all the nasty 2AM phone calls you will otherwise receive.

That’s right, in this episode (after a brief diversion through wave/particle duality) Uncle Bob takes on the dreaded Liskov Substitution Principle. He’ll tell you all about the history of the theory of types, including Russell’s paradox, and Turing’s revelations. He’ll show how this theory influenced early computer languages like Algol, Fortran, Cobol, and even C++.

Then he’ll dive into the favorite old conundrum of the squares and rectangles, and he’ll show that inheritance is not what it appears to be, and certainly not what you have been told it is. He’ll teach you about the Principle of Representatives and the implications it has for sub-typing and inheritance. electricity for dummies amazon And you Ruby programmers won’t get off scott free either! He’s got plenty to say to you about subtypes in dynamic languages.

Then, true to form, Uncle Bob will present a case study of a subtle LSP failure, and the horrific consequences it causes. electricity labs for middle school You won’t want to miss this part. By the time he’s done you’ll be hunting all through your code trying to find and repair potential LSP violations in order to prevent all the nasty 2AM phone calls you will otherwise receive.

When you see a web-based accounting system, the architecture of that system should scream accounting at you. The fact that it’s a web based system should be unnoticeable. After all, the web is just a delivery mechanism; and we don’t want our system architecture polluted with delivery mechanisms, databases, and other low level tools and concerns.

In this episode, Uncle Bob re-introduces the concepts first espoused by Ivar Jacobson, in his epic book: "Object-Oriented Software Engineering". Uncle Bob describes what use cases are, and how to make sure they are delivery agnostic. He shows you how to partition the system with use cases as the central organizing principle, and the primary abstraction. He also demonstrates how to isolate the system architecture from the rest of the system.

Uncle Bob illustrates how to use Jacobson’s three primary architectural classes: Entities, Interactors, and Boundaries. He describes how this triplet helps to decouple the system architecture from the delivery mechanism, leaving the web to dangle off the side of the architecture like an appendix. Uncle Bob goes on to show how Model-View-Controller and Model-View-Presenter are used on the delivery side of the system.

Then Uncle Bob hammers the point home with a case-study taken from his classic book: Agile Software Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices. gas pain After an informative briefing from the stakeholder, he performs a use-case analysis, and a high level object-oriented design to create the architectural superstructure on which the rest of the application will be built.

This episode begins an epic debate between the vanguard of craftsmanship and the mirror forces of traditional development. The gauntlet is thrown when Uncle Bob describes the real reason that code rots over time, and how that rot can be prevented and even reversed by a comprehensive suite of tests created through the discipline of Test Driven Development.

After a brief time-out, during which Uncle Bob describes the origins of the Moon; Uncle Bob dives into the argument for tests. He talks about why code really rots, and what happens when it rots too much. igas energy shares He talks about the failure of big cleanup projects, and how development teams are often dominated by the fear of changing the code. "Code Rots", he says, "because we are afraid to clean it."

Next Uncle Bob dives into the three laws of Test Driven Development — the central discipline of TDD. He describes each of those laws in turn, and answers the brief objections raised by the impatient mirror forces. Then Uncle Bob describes the benefits of following those three laws; the reduced debug time, the production of reliable low level documentation, the decoupling of the design, and the elimination of the fear of change.

"Duplication is the root of all evil!" is a phrase we certainly hear a lot in software development. gas vs electric stove top This is a bit harsh and over-the-top, of course, but it definitely is something we want to keep watch on. Eliminating duplication when we find it, early on in our lifecycle, is a good technique to master. It makes our software more accepting to change in the future, especially change we aren’t able to anticipate.

Through our previous episodes, we allowed a bit of duplication to spread regarding the states that a coderetreat can be in. If we let this go on for much longer, it will become much more difficult later to change them. It is time to put our foot down and remove this duplication. When working on a new system, timing is the key and we won’t wait any long to address this cleanup task.

In this episode, we’ll take a break from adding new features and focus our attention at the concept of duplication, specifically the duplication of knowledge around the statuses of the coderetreats. We’ll discuss the different types, and then investigate two different methods for eliminating it by isolating the knowledge it represents: an outside-in, wishful-thinking approach; and, an inside-out, pull-down approach. By the end of the episode, we’ll have a central location in our system that contains this information.

Now that we’ve finished our first feature, where do we go from here? In episode 3 of "Build an App with Corey Haines" we’ll not only talk about how our Feature Support Diagram can help us choose the next feature, but we’ll dive right in and start it. This episode is all about the code, so we won’t be satisfied with just starting it, we’ll take it to the finish!

While building this new feature, "Updating the status of a coderetreat", we’ll use a strict outside-in approach to our coding. Starting at the view layer and moving inward with a hearty dose of programming by wishful thinking, we’ll see more and more of our design coalesce around our domain concepts. 1940 gas station photos Our last episode introduced the concept of a presenter, distancing our business domain away from the Rails framework. In this episode, we’ll benefit again from this philosophy, except on the updating side, creating a simple coordinator object.

In Episode 1 and Episode 2, we noticed some awkwardness around some names we chose. At the time, we postponed fixing them until we had more knowledge about our domain. In this episode, we’ll see awkward names again, but this time we won’t stand for it! After implementing the feature, we’ll take time to clean up our design by extracting a new resource. We’ll discuss the strategy of making structural changes incrementally, keeping our system working at each step. This is a coding series, so we won’t just discuss it, we’ll put hands to keyboard and make the changes!