Does science contradict christianity the bible versus scientists. evolution and the big bang vs. creation. clockbackward essays electricity facts history

###########

MANY scientists and theologians have made the argument that Christianity is not at odds with the scientific world view. However, this claim is only partially correct. It is true that many portions of the Bible (for example, the Ten Commandments) do not make empirical claims and hence have no conflict with science, a field which concerns itself solely with those questions that are (at least in principle) of a testable nature. What’s more, in those sections of the Bible that do make empirical claims about the way things were or will be, if one is willing to apply a sufficiently metaphorical interpretation to the text then whenever science and Christianity appear to contradict each other we can simply loosen or relax the religious interpretation until the disagreement disappears. In other words, if religious writings are continuously reinterpreted so that they conform to our ever deepening scientific understanding of physical reality, then of course science and religion will remain mostly out of conflict.

As an illustration of Biblical interpretation adapting to science, consider Joshua 10:12-13, where the Bible says that the “sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.” Many early Christian writers took this passage, and others, as irrefutable proof that the earth is fixed in the heavens and that it is the sun that travels around the earth. gas national average 2009 For example, around the year 1600 AD, in response to the scientist Galileo’s support for the heliocentric view of the universe, Cardinal Bellarmine wrote:

“I say that, as you know, the Council (of Trent) prohibits expounding the Scriptures contrary to the common agreement of the holy Fathers. And if Your Reverence would read not only the Fathers but also the commentaries of modern writers on Genesis, Psalms, Ecclesiastes, and Josue, you would find that all agree in explaining literally that the sun is in the heavens and moves swiftly around the earth, and that the earth is far from the heavens and stands immobile in the center of the universe. Now consider whether the Church could encourage giving to Scripture a sense contrary to the holy Fathers and all the Latin and Greek commentators.”

Today, however, the astronomical evidence for the earth’s movement around the sun is so strong that there is almost no one who doubts it, even among those who take the Bible to be an inerrant revelation of God’s word. It appears that in this instance there has been a shift of biblical interpretation over time to fit the scientific evidence.

The preceding argument may give the impression that the Christianity and science are not or cannot be in conflict (either because they deal with different subjects, or because interpretation adapts to harmonize with science). It is undeniable, however, that a strictly literal and inflexible reading of the Bible deeply contradicts science, and it is simply not possible to reconcile these opposing points of view. Below I have outlined a few of the most extreme examples of direct disagreement.

Scientists, supported by enormous amounts of evidence (including transitions in the fossil record, DNA similarities between species, experimentally induced evolution in laboratories, observed evolution of bacteria, and empirically validated prediction based in theory) argue that all life on earth evolved from microorganisms. On the other hand, according to the biblical story in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2:

The big bang theory for the development of our universe is now accepted as truth by nearly every physicist, supported as it is by a great deal of evidence (including the cosmic background radiation, the observed velocities of galaxies, the distribution of elements throughout the galaxies, and the distribution of galaxies throughout space). According to the biblical story in Genesis 1, however:

Through the use of radiometric dating, scientists have been able to estimate the age of the earth to be within a percent or two of 4.54 billion years. A literal interpretation Genesis, however, tells us something very different. The book provides details about many of the descendants of Adam (the first man), including some information about the ages at which these descendants had children and died. gas oil mix ratio chart A number of biblical scholars have used this information (combined sometimes with information elsewhere in the Bible) to construct accounts of how old the earth must be, with estimates ranging from about 6,000 to 10,000 years, in dramatic contradiction with the scientific estimate.

According to Genesis 6-9 God caused it to rain for forty days and forty nights, so that “every living substance” that he has made will be destroyed “from off the face of the earth”. The flood supposedly was so great that water covered every mountain on the planet. Scientists have found no physical evidence to support the claim that there was a massive flood that wiped out nearly all life from the face of the earth, and which would have caused substantial geological changes to the planet. What’s more, archeologists are aware of a number of ancient civilizations that survived through this period when the great flood was supposed to have occurred.

The Bible also claims that the boat that Noah built to survive the flood contained two of “every wild animal according to its kind, all livestock according to their kinds, every creature that moves along the ground according to its kind and every bird according to its kind, everything with wings.” Today there are thousands of species of mammals, thousands of species of reptiles, and thousands of species of birds. Even if we assume for the sake of argument that there were only a thousand species in each of these groups in Noah’s day, the idea that he could have lived in a boat which contained at least two of each animal (in fact, he took seven of each “clean” animal ), is extremely hard to believe, especially considering that he had to store food for each, deal with their waste products, and prevent them from killing each other for the three hundred and seventy days of the journey, all in a time before electricity and refrigeration.

As far as scientists have been able to tell, the universe follows a set of immutable laws that are as true today as they were thousands of years ago. The Bible tells us, however, of a world where the physical laws that scientists repeatedly verify are every so often conspicuously violated by the will of God. The Bible tells of water being turned into wine, Jesus walking on water, the Nile becoming blood, Jonah living inside a fish for three days, Noah living to be 950 years old, demons being exorcised, and a few loaves and fishes feeding multitudes. Each of these events is incompatible with the laws of physics, as understood today by science.

The trouble with asking whether science and Christianity are inherently contradictory is that the answer depends on which definitions of “Christianity” and “contradiction” we care to employ. If the question is whether a literal reading of some passages of the Bible are at odds with Science, the answer is an unequivocal yes. On the other hand, there are of course many Christian beliefs that are related to issues (such as ethics) about which science has nothing to say. kd 7 electricity socks Finally, if we are willing to interpret the Bible as freely as we please, contradiction can be avoided. But then, of course, we are placed in the awkward position of choosing how literal each passage should be taken, leading to a multitude of possible biblical interpretations and little final consensus. Perhaps this partially explains why some Christian groups forbid condoms, while others don’t, some prohibit abortion, while others don’t, some forbid masturbation, while others don’t, and so on and so forth. Metaphorical interpretation can lead to enormous variety in beliefs.

I would like to present you information which is about to become a world sensation.As far as I`m concerned there is no connection until nowdays between Darwin`s theory and the version about the origin of the world in the Bible.According to the Bible the world has been created in six days,but according to the science this process has taken billions of years.If we exclude the difference in time and we pay attention to the SEQUENCE,we will see that there is no contradiction between both,but only the question-why in the Bible things happened so fast?There is an answer and it`s in the Bible itself.Moses described the creation from his own sight as an eyewitness.How could he have seen something happen before his existence?For forty days he has been at the mount Sinai where he got information about the past,present and future.The creation had been recreated to him there,he had seen how the already existing world had been made.The long process of evolution had been shown to him in the first six days and the SEVENTH day had been dedicated to human`s appearing.After that he had seen the difference between Adam`s origin and Eve`s one.Adam comes from the dirt in the process of evolution,but Eve comes from DNA material out his body,which marks another jump for the evolution or in other words-the missing section of the chain which science is looking for.The next Jump is coming…

Firstly, to believe that God used the means of death disease and bloodshed (aka evolutionary processes) to bring about his “very good” creation completely goes against scripture. Secondly, science, real and provable science, requires processes that can be tested, repeated and observed. 76 gas card login The loose and highly unsupported theory of evolution boasts no such facts. It is just as much a faith based theory as is creation. All we have in the current day is what we can see, what we can test, and prove in a lab. All other evidences are interpreted with a bias. Everyone is biased and had a view they bring to their ideas and decisions. It is sad how science has been twisted around so that people blindly accept theories that are unscientifically provable. Even the statement “millions of years”, which is spoon fed to millions of people, cannot be proved by scientific means. It would be interesting to see what this world would be like if more people looked at information for what it is–separating fact from theory–and didnt just accept, as fact, what they read about someone elses, or a group of peoples, ideas..

I don’t believe the Bible is something divine in of itself.. rahal e gas card I think there’s the ‘word of God’ himself, such as the 613 commandments, and then there’s text that was created by man, but *for* God. I believe in the Judaic “God”. I’m not entirely sure on what I think about who the “messiah” is, but I feel like I’d rather just believe in Jesus, be wrong, and nothing bad would happen other than being blissfully ignorant. Soo, even if Jesus isn’t the Messiah, it’s not like the ‘Jewish’ God would punish me for it.

Now, Christians went a hundred years or so without a “Bible” in the first place. It was taught through things similar to news clippings and word of mouth. A bunch of men decided on what would be what’s called the New Testament. There were gospels that weren’t even put in the bible. SO, because what we call the Bible *was* created by man, we shouldn’t always take things literally or point out self contradictions and think “well there’s no god”. I think man did what was best to write down what they think Jesus said or what they thought john or paul said or whoever. gas vs diesel rv It’s not divine. god himself is divine. That and things like “7 days 7 nights”. A day and a night is 12 hours only on the planet Earth… Who knows what God calls a day or a night… He could have a whole nother planet out there full of intelligent species lightyears away that worship him in some way. I think we look too much on what man writes down in a book, and then judge it by what man wrote… Instead we treat something materialistic as something to be divine. We treat the bible as “A god before god himself” almost.. kinda.

But either way we’ve got scientific theories that contradict each other as well, there are things about the rest of the universe we don’t understand despite the human species’ high intelligence. It seems as if if physics can contradict itself outside of the Earth, which it can(or so I’ve heard?? o.O), then there must be something divine controlling it..(I think)

GEN 3:19 says “For thou art dust, and to dust shalt thou return”. When we analysis the composition of man’s body and of the dust of the earth, we find that the major constituents of the human body are also present in typical samples of dust on the surface of earth. The constituents which are present in both dust and human body are composed of Calcium, Carbon, Potassium, Iron, Magnesium, Nitrogen, Sodium, Phosphorus, Oxygen, Chlorine, Sulphur etc.

LEVITICUS 17:11 reads “For the life of the flesh is in the blood” .Over the ages scientists argued about the ‘life of the flesh’ and suggested various organs in the human body carried this responsibility. Blood was never on their list. In 1628 Harvey proved that blood circulates from the heart to all parts of the body and thus is the ‘life of the flesh’. He was the first to discover what is a well know fact today and yet it was written thousand of years ago by Moses.

ECCLESIASTES 1:6 says “The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits” . The science of hydrology is a modern subject and yet Solomon in the BCs wrote about some of its basics. The above verse describes three phenomena about wind namely –