Dolby fm – tapeheads tape, audio and music forums gas national average 2013

############

The idea with reducing the pre-emphasis from 75 to 25 µS was that on a normal receiver with the standard 75 µS de-emphasis and no Dolby NR decoding, the added brightness of the Dolby encoding would give an end result of sounding similar to a standard non-encoded 75 µS FM signal, and given the primitive FM audio processing electricity word search pdf equipment of the time, the Dolby encoding would not cause as many modulation overshoots as if they had applied it without reducing the amount of pre-emphasis.

But when more advanced FM audio processing like the Orban Optimod became popular in the late ’70s and early ’80s, Dolby FM was rendered obsolete, because with the average modulation level now hovering around 90% – 100% rather than the 50% – 75% that electricity history timeline was typical in the pre-Optimod era, the audio would be above the Dolby threshold most of the time, so you’d just be left with the 25 µS pre-emphasis which would make ordinary FM receivers sound dull. Plus electricity voltage in canada the higher average modulation level would achieve practically the same improvement in S/N ratio as Dolby FM, without needing any special equipment on either the transmitting or receiving end, and without paying Dolby a licensing fee.

But Dolby FM was not the last attempt at adding noise reduction to FM radio; in the mid-’80s CBS Labs introduced FMX, which added CX-encoded audio (the same CX noise reduction that they tried adding to vinyl records, and was widely used on LaserDiscs) on a special subcarrier that only FMX-equipped radios could receive, so that it would grade 9 electricity unit test answers theoretically have no deleterious effect on non-equipped receivers. But after tests from Amar Bose (yes, that Mr. Bose) showed that in some cases FMX worsened multipath, thus making FM reception actually more noisy than without it, the radio industry quickly abandoned it.

The idea with gas and supply shreveport reducing the pre-emphasis from 75 to 25 µS was that on a normal receiver with the standard 75 µS de-emphasis and no Dolby NR decoding, the added brightness of the Dolby encoding would give an end result of sounding similar to a standard non-encoded 75 µS FM signal, and given the primitive FM audio processing equipment of the k gas cylinder time, the Dolby encoding would not cause as many modulation overshoots as if they had applied it without reducing the amount of pre-emphasis.

But when more advanced FM audio processing like the Orban Optimod became popular in the late ’70s and early ’80s, Dolby FM was rendered obsolete, because with the average modulation level now hovering around 90% – 100% rather than the 50% – 75% that was typical in the pre-Optimod era, the audio would be above the Dolby threshold most of the time, so you’d just be left with the 25 µS pre-emphasis which would make ordinary FM receivers sound dull. Plus the higher average modulation level would achieve practically the same improvement in S/N ratio as Dolby FM, without needing electricity and circuits test any special equipment on either the transmitting or receiving end, and without paying Dolby a licensing fee.

But Dolby FM was not the last attempt at adding noise reduction to FM radio; in the mid electricity how it works-’80s CBS Labs introduced FMX, which added CX-encoded audio (the same CX noise reduction that they tried adding to vinyl records, and was widely used on LaserDiscs) on a special subcarrier that only FMX-equipped radios could receive, so that it would theoretically have no deleterious effect on non-equipped receivers.

I was an engineer at one of the test stations early on. We found a serious conceptual problem with FMX. The idea was to transmit a second L-R subchannel, in quadrature with the normal subchannel (L-R, double-sidband, supressed carrier), but with their re-entrant electricity invented or discovered compression on it. The re-entrant idea was actually pretty good, it meant there was a dead zone where no compression took place, but above and below bp gas prices ny that zone, it did a lot. The basic FMX idea was that normal FM stereo receivers would not demodulate the quadrature subchannel. It turned out that wasn’t the case. Largely due to multipath delay and marginal stereo demod design, many radios actually demodulated a combination of the normal sub and the quadrature sub. Stations with highly processed, consistently loud signals may not have noticed the problem because the quadrature sub was less than or equal to the normal sub, be we broadcast wide dynamic range classical music, which means that their re-entrant compression curve was in it’s most active region much of the time, creating large difference between the quardature FM sub gas oil mix ratio chart and the normal one. The effect gas out of driving through multipath in that condition was like loud bursts of L-R, sounded almost like a dog barking, as the receiver snapped between demodulation the normal and quad-sub. We tested the system for less than a week on air, then removed it and bench tested for another week. Found lots of radios that couldn’t differentiate between the normal and FMX subcarrier.