Effects of energy independent us alternate history discussion electricity and magnetism notes

#############

There have been plenty of discussions and timelines on this board discussing how the United States could have a better energy economy — whether it’s just energy independence or a green economy. What I’m interested in here is what the effects of such an outcome would be — on other aspects of the n gas in paris lyrics United States, and/or on the world at large.

For example, take simple independence, where (from a 1960 PoD say) the US by 2000 both produces more and uses less petroleum than OTL, making it a net exporter: What effect would this have on the global oil economy? How would that effect power kinetic energy petro-states of OTL (like Saudi Arabia), and how would that, in turn, effect TTL’s geopolitics and overall world economy?

Or take a green economy, where (from a 1976 PoD say) the US has more nuclear and solar power, and started embracing electric cars in the 1990’s: In addition to the questions asked in the above scenario, would this make gas dryer vs electric dryer safety other countries more likely to rely on clean energy as well? How would environmental politics be affected? Or the environment for that electricity lessons 4th grade matter?

For starters, you’d have to make fracking as a technology more profitable much earlier than OTL. This would probably have to be done through friendlier legislation and government subsidies. Most of the technology for fracking has existed since the 1940s, it’s taking off now because with the rising price of Middle Eastern oil, it’s more profitable to frack in North gas approximation Dakota than drill in Saudi Arabia. In order to push the date of domestic fracking becoming cheaper than conventional extraction in the Middle East back a few decades, you’d have to severely reduce the supply of Middle Eastern oil. Maybe the petro states go Communist or something like that, but they have to be taken out of the picture or the US will just import oil electricity sources usa from them.

Third, get rid of the environmental movement. Maybe with all these people getting rich from fracking, there’s less of a cause. Either way, more hydroelectric dams and expanded nuclear energy will have to be made politically tenable(IOTL in the mid to late 1960s, there were a slew of proposals for huge hydroelectric m gasbuddy dams in the West, most never made it out of the planning stage due to environmental concerns).

If demand in the western world really does decrease, that will have an effect on world oil prices. It could lead que gases componen el aire to increased auto use or at least increased motorized transport use in emerging markets. It would take a lot more than a shift in energy policy to really hit the car market enough to shift global sales, but we’d certainly see trends that make cars a more affordable expense for some in developing nations c gastronomie traiteur avis. The same would go for motorbikes and the like.

If electric cars become the norm in the west in the ’90s, that might actually make gas cars even more expensive across the globe. If China, Japan, and South Korea got on board with electric, how worth it to car manufacturers is it to continue producing electricity demand for the rest of the globe? Surely some manufacturers will keep making those dirty engines, especially since we can expect a one-time HUGE dump of stock (at low-low-low prices) from each car manufacture as they either close or switch over to electric. That’s a one-time bargain for the third world (well, bargain anyway) that could get a lot of countries used to higher levels of auto ownership. It’ll keep a few gas gas station in spanish auto manufacturers afloat as they start building cars solely for the poorer parts of the world.

I would imagine there’s lots more arrogant pressure from the first world for the third world to clean up its act. But maybe lots more subsidies and i feel electricity in my body trade arrangements to do so as well. The Dutch and the Japanese will probably get really good at streamlining the process of building electric car infrastructures for developing countries and speed the planet’s total conversion.

Politically, the US probably can’t just give up on the Middle East while the Soviets are still around. And buying less of their oil is probably therefore not really feasible in the 1960s (but let’s overlook that for the purposes of this thread.) I can imagine more Soviet success in the region if the US isn’t as invested, which could have dire consequences for electricity nw Israel.

In the US domestically, sprawl slows down to a standstill by the late 90s as retro-fitting and up-zoning older ‘burbs becomes much, much, much cheaper. It shouldn’t be a surprise that the population is more progressive ITTL. It would take a more progressive country to make this happen in the first place, but the effect gas news of manipur is also self-reinforcing, as density leads to a more progressive outlook, psychologically.