Election 2016_ answers to questions about the proposal to change the process for amending the colorado constitution _ greeleytribune. com

Voters in Colorado this November could alter the ballot for every future election with a change to the how the state handles constitutional amendments.

With Amendment 71, the Raise the Bar effort wants to make it more difficult for residents to amend Colorado’s constitution — increasing the signature requirement to get an amendment on the ballot and requiring it pass with a larger margin of support than other measures.

Proponents claim Amendment 71 would help preserve the integrity of the Colorado Constitution and make it more difficult for myriad interest groups to muck with the state’s foundational document for their own gain. Electricity voltage in germany They would instead be forced to direct more effort toward making statutory changes at the ballot box.

Opponents claim Amendment 71 would forever destroy the ability for Colorado residents to keep their government in check, making it cost prohibitive to get amendments on the ballot and unrealistically difficult to pass them — while leaving it easier to completely remove elements of the Colorado Constitution that residents previously passed.

“Since 2005, I think 70 percent of the citizen-initiated measures are constitutional now. Electricity worksheets ks1 And most of them are police related items that should be statutory, that should be in the law and the constitution should be reserved for big ideas, the protection of basic rights, the direction of the functioning of government, but not for policy.— Greg Brophy, a former Colorado Senator who supports Raise the Bar and Amendment 71

It requires any constitutional amendment to pass with at least 55-percent of the vote — whereas current law requires just more than 50-percent of voters to approve the amendment.

Constitutional amendments initiated by residents would need signatures from 2 percent of registered voters — active and inactive — in each of Colorado’s 35 State Senate Districts to get on the ballot. Electricity and circuits That’s instead of the current requirement of 5 percent of the number of voters who participated in the previous Secretary of State election. Electricity vs magnetism venn diagram For context, groups that sought to get amendments on the ballot this year needed about 98,000 signatures.

Although the amendment would increase the threshold to pass a constitutional amendment, it leaves the voter requirement to repeal constitutional amendment at 50 percent.

“All of them have higher signature requirements, so the threshold to get on the ballot is higher,” said Greg Brophy, a former Colorado Senator who has spent the better part of the past year supporting Raise the Bar and the Amendment 71 issue.

Only a few states have the same requirements for constitutional and statutory change — as Colorado currently does — he said. Electricity 2pm lyrics The rest have requirements that make constitutional changes more difficult than statutory alterations.

In Florida, constitutional amendments require 60 percent of the vote to pass and in Nevada voters have to approve constitutional changes in two concurrent general elections, Brophy said.

Although opponents concede some states have harder requirements than Colorado — arguing that a few are about the same — they say it’s already difficult enough to amend Colorado’s constitution.

“Anyone who says it is easy to change our constitution is somebody who has either never tried or is remarkably wealthy,” said Independence Institute President Jon Caldara.

Caldara calls Amendment 71 an elite power grab by the political establishment, backed by career politicians and wealthy associations with lobbyists.

Brophy, on the other hand, highlights Raise the Bar’s coalition of support from groups including agricultural organizations and civic groups.

“Basically anyone who has ever been targeted by a constitutional amendment or had to pony up money to fend off a constitutional amendment is sending us money to make it less likely they’ll have to do it in the future,” he said.

“It ensures that anything that is offered as a constitutional amendment has broad support from across all Colorado,” Brophy said. Gas law questions and answers “And it encourages the people that want to use the initiative process to make changes to law instead of the constitution.”

Because of the current ease with which residents can get a constitutional amendment on the ballot right now, Colorado has experienced a deluge of attempts to change the state’s guiding document, Brophy said.

“Since 2005, I think 70 percent of the citizen-initiated measures are constitutional now,” he said. F gas regulations “And most of them are policy related items that should be statutory, that should be in the law and the constitution should be reserved for big ideas, the protection of basic rights, the direction of the functioning of government, but not for policy.”

Although it should be harder to amend the constitution than to amend statutory law, there are better ways to do it, Caldara said. Z gas cd juarez telefono As an example he suggested using Colorado’s U.S. Astrid y gaston lima menu prices House districts, of which Colorado has seven, instead of the 35 state senate districts, when setting the threshold for signatures.

It gives politicians unchecked power by creating a death sentence for the initiative process, Caldara said. Gas under a dollar Although Colorado voters could still pass statutory changes at the ballot, state lawmakers can just repeal them, he said.

The amendment goes too far, to the point of preventing any future change. Find a gas station near me The changes to the signature requirements alone could prevent any group without significant political and finical resources from even getting a constitutional amendment on the ballot, he said.

“If you could do the impossible and get through the hoops to get (something) on the ballot raising it to a super-majority vote means that we’ll never see reforms again like (the Taxpayer Bill of Rights), or term limits or transparency, or the ethics laws or the ban on government money going to abortion,” Caldara said.