Energy sector rating marketperform charles schwab electricity out


Apparent discipline among oil producers appears to have helped oil prices rise. While lackluster global growth and fuel efficiency improvements have dampened oil demand in recent years, it’s possible that better U.S. and global economic growth and potential geopolitical uncertainty eventually could lead to higher oil prices. Market outlook for the energy sector

The energy sector hasn’t kept up with the price rise of oil over the past year—a break from historical precedent and one that isn’t likely to last, in our view. In fact, over the past couple of months, we have seen the energy sector outperform and begin to close this gap. This is part of the reason why we have kept a market weighting on the group—it can be fairly volatile and change direction pretty quickly, much as we’ve seen over the past few months—with the energy sector being the best performing group. However, the International Energy Agency recently stated that U.S. shale production is growing even faster than it did during the time period when oil was trading at over $100/barrel, noting that shale producers “cut costs dramatically” during the downtrend in oil prices. This illustrates why we’re still concerned that the discipline shown on the supply side both with OPEC and here in the U.S. won’t last as companies and countries chase profits. Additionally, according to Baker Hughes, the rig count in the U.S. has started to move higher again after a brief dip.

We admit to being more cautious than others with regard to the energy sector, due largely to the potential risks of a sharp turnaround—much as we’ve seen in the past—but we aren’t opposed to those with higher risk tolerances looking to be modestly overweight in energy, understanding that reversals are quite possible. According the NDR, a similar divergence between oil and the sector occurred in 2002, which was followed by energy outperformance in 2003 as the sector caught up with the price of oil. Despite our caution, there remain bullish developments and should discipline among producers continue to hold—both domestically and globally, we would consider upgrading the group. To be sure, global growth has improved, with recent Markit PMI readings remaining in positive territory, which could help to support oil demand growth. But at this point we don’t think growth will rise to the point of producing a spike in the need for oil, keeping us in the marketperform camp—for now.

It is often said that the cure for high energy prices is high energy prices and we could be getting closer to that point, leading to our continued hesitation to raise the overall weighting on the group. So, for now, we believe the factors outlined above support a rating of marketperform. Factors that may affect the energy sector

Schwab Sector Views do not represent a personalized recommendation of a particular investment strategy to you. You should not buy or sell an investment without first considering whether it is appropriate for you and your portfolio. Additionally, you should review and consider any recent market news.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Markit Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is a n indicator of the economic health of the manufacturing sector. The PMI index includes the major indicators of: new orders, inventory levels, production, supplier deliveries and the employment environment.

The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc. (MSCI) and Standard & Poor’s. GICS is a service mark of MSCI and S&P and has been licensed for use by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.