Environment oops….another climate change lie correction – page 6 – chiefsplanet i gas shares

############

This highlights much of the problem selling Climate Change. People in many cases agree we have ongoing climate change. electricity generation definition The breakdown comes in the application of fixes that are poorly developed, expensive , and unproven. Then along comes a claim like yours and your cred is shot in the ass. No one will read another pro climate change thing you put forward without remembering the time you tried to say that attempts to address climate change does not equate to higher energy costs…

It’s amazing how much conservatives rail on alternative energy subsidies yet sidestep that big oil is one of the most influential lobbies in the US. To the tune of ~$35B in incentives & corporate welfaree. electricity and magnetism purcell That’s not even counting the potentially trillions in indirect subsidies. Alternative energy is a mouse fart compared to what big oil gets. I agree we don’t necessarily need all the regulations demanding energy efficiency… But it’s naive to think those hurdles even dent the amount of incentives oil companies receive from govt.

If you want fiscal responsibility, then shouldn’t the better solution be for govt to get out of oil? Allow for a freer market with fair competition. npower electricity supplier number Where alternative energy can invest in capital with as much ease as oil without govt significantly tilting the scales. Where innovators can try new things without regulatory obstacles. And if the govt is investing in public infrastructure like buses, why not invest in energy efficient vehicles instead? None of those things will change your ability to do things. electricity merit badge worksheet It may increase your gas price, but that’s the price of reducing govt subsidies which is worth it, right?

Ultimately, the scales will tilt. a gas station near me Europe & China is already taking the lead on replacing public vehicles with energy efficient ones. Uber & Lyft will dramatically increase availability of battery car infrastructure, which is by far the biggest hurdle to adoption. Infrastructure will create demand which will create more organic supply, which means less need for incentives. You can’t help but wonder how much further along we’d be on this journey if not for the expensive effort to kill innovation for decades upon decades.

It’s amazing how much conservatives rail on alternative energy subsidies yet sidestep that big oil is one of the most influential lobbies in the US. To the tune of ~$35B in incentives & corporate welfaree. gas and bloating pain That’s not even counting the potentially trillions in indirect subsidies. Alternative energy is a mouse fart compared to what big oil gets. I agree we don’t necessarily need all the regulations demanding energy efficiency… grade 9 electricity unit test But it’s naive to think those hurdles even dent the amount of incentives oil companies receive from govt.

If you want fiscal responsibility, then shouldn’t the better solution be for govt to get out of oil? Allow for a freer market with fair competition. Where alternative energy can invest in capital with as much ease as oil without govt significantly tilting the scales. Where innovators can try new things without regulatory obstacles. And if the govt is investing in public infrastructure like buses, why not invest in energy efficient vehicles instead? None of those things will change your ability to do things. It may increase your gas price, but that’s the price of reducing govt subsidies which is worth it, right?

Ultimately, the scales will tilt. Europe & China is already taking the lead on replacing public vehicles with energy efficient ones. Uber & Lyft will dramatically increase availability of battery car infrastructure, which is by far the biggest hurdle to adoption. Infrastructure will create demand which will create more organic supply, which means less need for incentives. gas apple pay You can’t help but wonder how much further along we’d be on this journey if not for the expensive effort to kill innovation for decades upon decades.