Fremont petroleum fpl.asx – prove the theory to win the acreage prize – wentworth securities livewire electricity billy elliot karaoke


There are a few reasons why I recently took an interest in Freemont Petroleum (FPL.ASX $0.011), the first was that they had an existing gas reserve in place, (the “Backup Value”), and they owned 100% of a large 21,500 acre field, for which they wb state electricity board bill pay are getting first results in as we speak (the “Bluesky”). The other key piece of information is the company was previously known as Austin Exploration AKK.ASX (a real “Stinker”, if I summarise bluntly), and the stale selling of AKK shareholders kept the newly recapitalised/new management FPL cheap. I am interested now, as it looks as if the first well (JW Powell) will work and prove their “Theory”, which may show FPL is sitting on 21,500 acres of very undervalued ground (at $0.011 trading on back of the envelope US$444 per acre, whilst Wattenburg to north is trading ~US$5,000 to ~$15,000 per e85 gas stations colorado acre)

FPL is based in Fremont County Colorado US. It has current production ~120 boe/d Production (including ~23bopd from its Kentucky leases) which gives it enough cash flow to wash its face. Further, it has 1.8mmboe of Reserves of liquids-rich gas and oil in FPL’s 100% owned Pathfinder field (yet to commercialise). It has 21,500 of largely contiguous acreage 100% owned over the Niobrara Shale (Net Revenue Interest of ~75% (between 72% to 81%) in a producing area. The Stinker

Previously known as Austin Exploration (AKK.ASX), which had a pretty consistent history of raising money, unsuccessful drilling and deals, then raising more money at ever lower prices. Thus 1,232,770,559 shares on issue and the micro gas monkey live market cap [$13.5m at 1.1c]. It changed to Freemont Petroleum back in June 2017. Plenty of shareholders happy to move on I imagine, however that might be unfortunate timing. Since AKK change to FPL, there have been management changes, and the company was recently recapitalised, most recently at 0.7c (Mkt Cap $8.6m). Management has put their own money into the company. So no free rides, and they want to protect the share structure (avoid dilution if at all possible). The volume is lifting finally in FPL as results near, this allows the register to tighten up a little and take shape. (example, the latest week rolling value is $1.89m vs 6 Month rolling value $4.6m) The Backup Value

FPL already has national gas average 2012 3 successful horizontal wells, each flowed an average ~1.38 mmcfg/d of liquids rich gas and in part led to a big boost in Proven Probable Contingent Niobrara Resource (2C) to 31.4 mil bbl oil and 366 bcf gas. The traditional play of the shallow Pierre Formation also has 25.6mil bbl of 2C oil, 79 bcf of gas resource. What does this all mean? They have significant gas in the ground, the value of which can only be realised if they can sign a deal with an end user, which will then allow them to connect it into regional pipelines gas dryer vs electric dryer. We are waiting on such a deal/catalyst. The Bluesky

FPL has been drilling JW Powell in the Nibrara. The first thing to note is the hole is being drilled by Schlumberger (SLB.NYS $59b Mkt electricity 101 Cap), who are testing their highly successful fracking technique in the Niobrara formation ( The prior drilling release confirmed the intersection is 537 feet thick). The short summary is Schlumberger’s innovative process dills horizontal drainage spokes into multiple layers of the Niobrara shale and fracs them. Why is this important? It is that is significantly cheaper (~$1.5m) than drilling a conventional horizontal well and fracking. This approach has been very successful elsewhere in the basin. This is Schlumberger’s gig – make no mistake, there is more for them in this well than FPL. They want to successfully prove the technique works in the Niobrara formation. This opens a lot of acreage for drilling. A big plus for FPL though. Friday’s announcement is significant. It indicates while they have only unloaded 35% of the fracking fluid, they are already flaring gas and storing oil. The assumption is clearly as the pressure abates the flow of both increases. They move very soon to IP (initial production) testing which will be a key catalyst.

FPL may just have its kansas gas service login luck turn. The key to the JW Powell well is for Schlumberger to be able to say that the technique works in the Niobrara (let’s think of it as a demonstration well). I would be very surprised if Schlumberger did not go from not wanting to be disclosed in the FPL announcements (in case the well was not a success), to highly visible and helpful and explaining the results. Then FPL’s acreage gas 101 may be worth significantly more than what it is currently priced. At $0.011 a simple acreage calculation is US$444 per acre. This is a big gap to the Wattenberg field up north, where a low price is ~US$5000/acre and they have traded recently as high as US$15,000 per acre. If I discount the low end (US$5000) by 50%, that electricity merit badge requirements is US$2,500 per acre. With the current share structure and exchange rate, that is a price of ~$0.065 for FPL (this is not a forecast). I acknowledge there is a lot more to do to unlock that value, and risks, however, the discount is very wide, and uniquely FPL owns 100% of the 21,500 acres. The company says more to come.

Given the company history and restrictions from Schlumberger, I hope to date they have been very conservative in guiding the market. They are making it clear they are confident, given the early signs at JW Powell, that the flow rates to be released should be positive. They also indicated they have other things to announce to shareholders (From Friday’s announcement).

Revenue was $280k and spent $1,565m z gas cd juarez telefono on exploration (total expenditure $1,735m). They had $1,330m left at bank and plans to spend $1,065m over this coming Qtr. So there is an obvious question mark over future capital raise or the timing of. They can push through the quarter without needing to raise, they would be rolling the dice on the JW Powell results and whatever they are alluding to in their last announcement. As a shareholder, and in talking to others, you would think the better option is to push forward for now. I acknowledge the risk of a capital raise though. It would be good if the company clarified their thoughts on this. To be fair, they need the results from JW Powell first (a week or so away).

This company interests me, as they can unlock an uplift in their acreage value by proving the electricity symbols flow rates using the Schlumberger technique. Good for both parties if proven. They have existing assets which are yet to be commercialised which can add value. The management has invested their own money, so realigned with shareholders. The 100% field ownership makes it a relatively easy story to understand, provided the results come in as hoped. I certainly think it is worth following, in the junior oil space. Prior to the JW Powell drilling, PAC Partners published a research note with a $0.016/share price target, very speculative buy. This PT was $0.02 prior and downgraded as a result of the fall in the oil z gas el salvador precios price back in Nov/Dec 2018. (PAC was a broker to FPLs prior capital raise at $0.007)

Please Note – This note is not a recommendation or advice to buy or sell FPL shares mentioned. FPL shares should be considered very speculative, high-risk, and volatile. There are significant risks inherent in oil and gas exploration that are not discussed in this note. You should always seek professional advice before considering any share purchase or sale. Please read our full disclaimer. This is a desk trading note, and not a research document, and the view of the authors gas efficient cars 2015 only. The author has not met the company management and company management have had no input into this note. Wentworth has not independently checked all information contained in this note for its accuracy.