German losses if sealion goes ahead page 4 alternate history discussion electricity deregulation wikipedia

###########

Hm, this is one of those topics that gets some folk say impossibru!!! no matter what. Of course, real history happened the way we know (so should be grateful for that). However, it doesn’t take much for things to have been different, and no, it doesn’t need any volcanoes. Have the german gas bijoux discount code leadership be a little more farsighted in 1939-early 1940 and actually seriously plan for the possiblity that the UK won’t accept an armistice. Have them fit drop tanks to the Bf-109E and 110 earlier, and give a bit more attention to actually combating Royal Navy in such a case (an earlier Fliegerkorps X if you like.)

To have them proceed with gas and electric nyc the invasion means they have achieved air superiority over the landing zones, no doubt the losses during the landing would have been heavy, but once on shore the german tanks and infantry would be unstopable imo, i don’t think anyone could stop them in 1940 without a large numerical superiority (think USSR). The best outcome would be a sort of France situation for UK, i.e. one part under german control and the rest independent.

A POD closer to the invasion date would be if Hitler doesn’t order the switch to bombing London and LW keeps up the pressume on Fighter Command. As i understand it, they were close to breaking gas 2015 point. The switch to just bombing London was a godsend. The above apply in this case as well, although the chances of success are reduced. But there is still a far from insignificant chance the invasion might still succeed.

Apart from Fighter Command, afaik Bomber Command didn’t had more than 500 aircraft operational at that time, no doubt they will all be bombing the beaches, but have a look at the gigantic number of aircraft and sorties needed to reduce the combat ability of the german troops in places like France 1944. The situation is different in 1940, german troops would be exposed, but compared to 1942 let alone 1944, i think Bomber Command’s effect would me much less than it is assumed. Of course they would also electricity production by source throw at the beaches every other available older or newer aircraft that can be armed and machine-gun the germans, but they will likely be slaughtered by flak.

Click to expand…These are big problems if you want the results of the simulation to be realistic. Of course, the Luftwaffe defeating the RAF would be very difficult, but any realistic scenario of wargaming Sealion has to assume that. The RAF will eventually come back given grade 9 electricity formulas time, but Sealion would only require several weeks of local German air supremacy. After that time, the Germans will have either won or lost regardless

There are still lots of reasons to assume Germany will lose. However, it’d be interesting to compare the losses of both sides and how this would impact the rest of the war. A Britain which went through the trauma of invasion, the loss of ships by airpower, and the additional losses in men and material will be even more risk averse for the rest of the war.

Having defeated the Germans in autumn 1940, but suffering through the site of German troops marauding in southern England before the final defeat. How much pressure will be brought to bear to negotiate peace before Germany launches a second invasion (which won’t happen, but will likely be believed)? It’s all well and good to say Britain would never negotiate peace with Hitler, but morale does change. I think there are good chances after the initial exultation/relief of defeating Sea Lion that a lot of people in Britain gas x dosage pregnancy could become defeatest.

Click to expand…I guarantee it has. But let’s beat the bloody, unrecognizable pulp that used to be a horse a bit more, shall we? An amphibious power company near me invasion is one of the most complex military maneuvers out there, because there are a ton of moving parts and a million different things you have to deal with that you don’t have to deal with on land. Germany had pretty much zero experience with amphibious assaults, and absolutely zero experience with something as large as Sealion. Even the British and Americans during Torch and Husky made a ton of mistakes, including supplies and troops landing in the wrong areas. Germany doesn’t have the luxury of learning from it’s mistakes. One failed Sealion essentially ends German naval operations outside gas out game commercial of U-boats for the remainder of the war. Because of the barges Germany either had to capture a fully intact port or else deal with only being able to send small quantities of tanks, artillery, and horses. And even a fully intact port would only be able to send 20% of the supplies needed, with the rest having to be airdropped or sent across the barges.

Nore Commands’s orders of 4 July give some idea of what might have happened had the destroyers needed to confront an invasion fleet. If possible they were to allow the enemy to cross the east coast mine barrier and attack him just to the west of it, as it would allow him little room for manoeuvre. Furthermore, it would make it possible for a strong fighter cover to be provided, assuming the RAF had not been defeated by that time. The sea battle would be Nelsonic, for ammunition gas leak in car supplies were not unlimited , and ‘Close action must be the general rule, so that the biggest percentage of hits may be obtained with every outfit of ammunition’. The commander on the spot had to decide whether to attack in ones or twos, or wait to form up divisions of three or four, which would give them an advantage if an enemy destroyer force was close, but it increased the risk of collision in poor visibility. If destroyers on passage sighted enemy transports they were to engage them; if they saw them trying to enter a port, they should attack them electricity tower vector at all costs. If possible the destoyers should get between the transports and their naval escort, so that the torpedoes could hit the larger vessels. They were to aim especially at vessels that might be carrying tanks. The destroyers could also engage medium-sized ships with their guns and smaller ones with pom-poms and machine-guns. If they ran out of ammunition they should go as fast as possible to a port to replenish…..

On 26 August the Nore Command issued general orders on how to deal with an invasion and again the echoes were Nelsonian – ‘No captain can do very wrong if he engages enemy transports at close range action’ On receipt of the signal ‘Purge’ , all ships were to come to instant readiness for battle and be ready to execute the general orders without any reference to the C-in-C. Once they had left harbour, the senior officers in charge of groups of cruisers, destroyers and MTBs would electricity distribution companies ‘use their initiative and judgement according to the circumstances and the information that reaches them’.