Global warming energy restrictions threaten u.s. national security watts up with that gas stoichiometry worksheet

#############

Global warming activists claim climate change poses a threat to America’s military and national security. Their primary assertion is that gas 93 octane alleged negative impacts from global warming—such as crop failures, droughts, and extreme weather events—create political, social, and military upheaval. To enhance our military security, these activists claim America should impose carbon dioxide restrictions on the U.S. economy and the American people.

The United States sustains the most powerful military in the world, because the electricity human body dominant U.S. economy enables policymakers to spend more on military preparedness than any other nation. America’s continuing ability to field a powerful military depends on the United States retaining its status as the world’s dominant economic power. Proposals to restrict U.S. carbon dioxide emissions and impose expensive, jobs-killing energy sources on the electricity distribution companies economy present a clear and present danger to military strength. This is especially true because the Paris Climate Agreement and other international climate agreements target Western-style democracies and impose no similar carbon dioxide restrictions on many potentially hostile nations.

Because of its significant grade 9 electricity formulas role in the globe’s most important energy markets, America has unique economic advantages, international leverage, and military power. By contrast, China is the leading source of the rare earth minerals that are necessary electricity production by source to produce wind and solar power equipment. Making a political decision to transform the U.S. and global economies from American-dominant energy sources to Chinese-dominant energy sources would pose new and severe threats to American international influence and U.S. national security.

The negative economic and geopolitical impacts of carbon dioxide emissions restrictions and an attempted transformation to a wind- and solar-powered economy are amplified by the lack of any substantial national security threats related to Earth’s ongoing modest warming. It is speculative and dubious to assert that gasco abu dhabi contact crop failures, droughts, or other negative climate events occurring overseas would reduce U.S. national electricity a level physics security. However, even if that were the case, the frequency and severity of such unfortunate events is diminishing as Earth modestly warms, not increasing. Rather than being a threat multiplier, the impacts of ongoing modest warming serve as a threat reducer.

To enhance national security, policymakers should (1) encourage greater production of U.S. domestic conventional energy resources, (2) encourage optimal use of domestic conventional energy resources in the American economy, (3) support more U.S. conventional energy exports, and (4) resist calls to impose carbon dioxide restrictions on the economy.

The 3 gases in the air EU has been trying to slow the gas and electric nyc U.S. economy since economic power transfers directly to military power and cultural influence. China and the Russians will just support anything that taxes or distracts the U.S. They all understand that they cannot compete fairly with the American freedom-economic award system. Every concern that seems to threaten U.S. progress gets destroyed or trivialized by the Americans. Examples include gas out game commercial:

Unfortunately the American Left, Russians, Chinese, EU and the UN have found a great tool in the Green Movement or CO2 fear-mongering. Damper the fuel supply and you’ll slow the economy and correspondingly military power and cultural influence. When I look at the American Left/AOC and their embrace of this, the following comments ring loudly:

The Climate Change narrative gives them the opportunity that was denied by the U.S. mindset, progress and logic. Whatever their Green a gas station Deal wealth tax gets originally established at, say 2% of 10 million, they know they’ll have to lower it significantly after the programs are established. It’ll have to invade the middle class and drop from 10 million to say 200 K after they soon realize there’s not save electricity images enough wealthy people around but have the paycheck to paycheck workers and fixed income folks addicted.

Like the others listed above, the “threat” of increasing atmospheric CO2 will be resolved or trivialized by American ingenuity and technology within 10 years and electricity projects for grade 7 without derailing the U.S. economy. At that point it’ll be very entertaining to see what emerges as their new crusade, hopefully this’ll occur before socialism has a chance to infect the U.S.