Hard to believe but yet another global warming boner! the rugged individualist gas jet compressor


The furor over global warming was kicked into overdrive when Al Gore made a movie entitled An Inconvenient Truth. electricity bill cost per month For this film he won not only an Oscar, but also the Nobel Peace Prize (if one ever needed proof the Nobel Peace Prize should be re-entitled the Nobel Political Pap Prize, this is it). Let me start with a fact that cannot be challenged. The “facts” in his movie were adjudicated in the High Court of London and found to be wanting. Yes, that is correct, the High Court of London ruled that the movie was b*llsh*t! Of course, a British jurist would never use such crude language. The ruling listed 35 factual errors.The actual errors are interesting, but I will make one point only. gas used in ww1 All of the errors pointed in one direction, toward overestimating the increase in global warming and their significance to Earth’s environment. That is a statistical impossibility. Only one possible conclusion can be drawn from this fact: this is not science but environmental activism.

To begin, Al Gore’s environmental advisor, Ms. Kalee Kreider, testified that it was filled with “thousands and thousands of facts.” However, here is an undeniable computational fact: it was not and could not have been filled with “thousands and thousands of facts.” Just 2,000 “facts” in a 93 minute film would have been one fact every three seconds. gas giants In fact, there were only a few dozen or so “facts” in this environmental diatribe. gas meter in spanish Thirty five of the “facts” were found to be either frankly erroneous or suspect. The judge actually ruled on nine points. Oops, the movie’s “facts” were judged to be “nonfactual.” When the trial concluded even the UK Government, to which Mr. electricity orlando Gore is a climate-change advisor, had to admit it did not represent mainstream scientific opinion. How then can the United Nations state that global warming is “settled science?” I could stop right here. Not many disputes of this nature have been settled by the High Court of London (don’t you just love that name).

The comparison of the three very different climate models allowed the scientists to be even more precise in their projections and enabled the scientists to put more accurate figures on the relation between global warming and declining yields. The models unanimously demonstrate that for each 1°C that the global temperature increases, the global wheat production is projected to decline by an average of 5.7 percent. gas bubbles in colon So what happened, ask you? Read the graphs, answer I.

Do any of you remember a documentary entitled “Chasing Ice?” It was right up there with an “Inconvenient Truth.” The “scientists” claimed that manmade-global-warming would cause Greenland’s ice sheets to completely melt away. “Chasing Ice” showed “heroic guys in expensive North Face parkas bravely wandering around Greenland’s melting glaciers while sad piano music played in the back ground.” Well, guess what? Greenland’s ice sheet hit a near record level in 2017.

A recent study based on a climate model claimed the oceans had retained 60% more warming than previously thought. It made headlines around the world with its alarming conclusion. It was also used by numerous climate scientists to explain “the pause” (a decade of no warming when calamity had been predicted). gas 10 8 schlauchadapter The explanation was that instead of warming the atmosphere the warming had occurred in the oceans.

“When we were confronted with his insight it became immediately clear there was an issue there,” Ralph Keeling, a climatologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and one of the co-authors of the study, told The San Diego Union-Tribune. “We’re grateful to have it be pointed out… Our error margins are too big now to really weigh in on the precise amount of warming that’s going on in the ocean. We really muffed the error margins.“