Has climate-change politics hit a wall ~ david wilkin 10 gases


• Renewables are used mostly in power generation, but there are real, hard limits to its overall share. Germany, a renewables leader, recently learned this, as it was forced to open new coal plants following the closure of nuclear plants. electricity worksheets high school Green renewables in the German power-grid generate about 18 per cent of its power, and this appears close to the upper share-limit to ensure power-grid stability. Carbon-based backup generation is necessary to balance the load demand.

• According to IEA 2017 CO2 emission reports, only seven of 195 Paris Agreement signing countries, and none of the 32 largest emitters were on track to meet commitments ( China and India accounted for almost half of the 1.6 per cent 2017 global CO2 increase). Forecasts point to emissions growth in 2018, potentially by 2.7 per cent, despite the Paris Agreement calls for over one per cent reduction per year.

• The US became the world’s largest oil producer in 2018, and is on track to become a net energy exporter within a few years. This change has big geo-political consequences, particularly for Canada (the US takes 99 per cent of our oil exports), the Middle East, Russia, & China. Yet, somehow the US still managed to reduce carbon emissions by 0.5 per cent in 2017, better than all major emitters.

Ray, it just isn’t as simple as, “Let’s all drive electric cars.” Talk to an electrical engineer about that possibility. 1) Our aging electric grid could not possibly supply the electrical energy needed to power all of those cars. 2) Do you not think that the production of that power entails pollution? 3) Electrical engineers run the numbers and understand that wind and solar are part of the mix in the energy basket but impractical for much of the energy needed. For example, the desert southwest in the U.S. has LOTS of sunshine but is far from the major population centres of the northeastern and eastern U.S. 4) California has promoted solar-powered electricity as a way of reducing their “carbon footprint” and discovered, to their dismay, that it isn’t particularly efficient or cost-effective. 5) How will the western U.S. producers get the solar-powered electricity to the eastern U.S. where it is needed? Electrical transmission over long distances, faces significant losses of power in the transmission. 6) Using coal-fired plants to produce the power for all of those electric vehicles will end up polluting possibly more than the present system. 7) It is not, at this time, politically acceptable to use nuclear power for much more of the energy picture. gas x while pregnant Everyone apparently thinks nuclear power is a swell idea until a power company proposes to build a nuclear power plant five miles from their house.

No one has yet proved that the admittedly SMALL increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (carbon dioxide is a VERY small part of what comprises our air) will have anything close to what the “Chicken Little” prognosticators have dreamed up to scare everyone with. Al Gore said TEN years ago that we would have NO ICE at the poles within five years from that date. We are five years past his projected doomsday and, last time I checked, we still had an awful lot of ice at the poles. In fact, the Inuit say that the ice pack has increased in some areas. electricity games online free Methane is a MUCH more potent greenhouse gas and yet no one is talking much about it. Probably because they can’t figure out how to make us pay a tax on it. Ten years ago, an administrator at the U.N. admitted that the whole carbon tax idea was simply a way to get wealthy nations to transfer some of their wealth to poor nations (which are typically hotbeds of corruption where people in power scrape off huge proportions of everything given to those nations by the “wealthy” nations). The fact that the people behind the carbon tax plan are the same people who brought the world the “oil-for-food” scam (that made a number of people attached to the U.N. very wealthy–including the son of the then, Secretary General, Kofi Anan) should make us very suspicious. I could go on but now you know why people in France are rioting in protest of the huge tax hike on gasoline.

In the heating season, we have a wood burning furnace and it also consumes all paper waste as well. Although we use about 25 face cords of wood per year in this furnace I find that most of what I need for it comes from damaged, dead or wind fallen trees. Very few good trees are needed and I’m not even making a small dent it the trees we have.

We have two 10 kw solar installations too. mp electricity bill payment These work ok. If I could add about 50 to 60 kw more of these it would make our business and homes here essentially a net zero user of electricity. I have the room, I have the money to install this but the government has enough rules and obstructions such that I cannot do this. kite electricity generation They profess to be trying to “help the environment” but when it comes to something practical like this…. nothing is allowed to proceed.

Back to those tourists…. I’ve seen cases where a family of 5 people produces about three full size garbage bags of trash per day…. day after day! Sadly, without trying to be racist or anything, Asians and Americans seem to be the worst offenders in this catagory. They are good for the economy I suppose but they leave a literal wake of trash behind them as they travel.

You know, they really did not need this many cars nor that much use and I haven’t even mentioned that the kids are driving giant pick up trucks with one person on board and the parents have an SUV that has an engine in it that would have easily looked at home in a tractor trailer a few years back… Do we really need a 400 HP diesel in a truck or SUV that collects the groceries and trundles dad to work each day? Again, can you see an issue looming here? If you can’t you’re part of the problem most likely.

Two thoughts come to mind. First, Brian, you just landed on the next article I am currently working on! (we should talk!) By ~2040, economists forecast the world’s middle class will almost double to 7B people. China and India alone will account for half of it. As you point out, these 3.5B people will all want what we already enjoy. Given some of the energy facts I pointed out in my article, it is easy to see that there is no way CO2 emission can possible hit targets to achieve the 2-degree C stated red line. 10 ethanol gas problems Emissions will continue to rise if this growth happens, even accelerate, as we have witnessed in the last few years. Something will have to give.

This brings me to my point on why I think Trump made the right decision to pull the US out of the flawed Paris Agreement. It brings the world attention to this simple reality – committed targets by the countries with the big emerging middle class will not reduce emission growth for 50 years or more. Period. The current modern middle class countries (EU, North America, Japan) with its ~1B people could drop their emissions to 0 over the next 20 years, and it still won’t work. It’s a zero sum game. China and other emerging countries that are following China’s proven model will not trade off growth goals for lower emissions. Their weak Paris commitments reflect this reality. The switch off of the carbon-based energy can not happen fast enough. This is the dilemma the world leaders must face. gas and water llc No more nice talk, and wishful thinking. It has to be confronted head on if we believe the experts’ climate models are right. Trump has just called it out. (in his usual, blunt way)