How long could hms queen elizabeth and hms duke of edinburgh lasted page 3 alternate history discussion gas meter reading


I do not agree. the British had no clue how to mount a vectored air defense or use SAM traps or apply the air defense ortega y gasset la rebelion de las masas onion. They lost their highly perishable WW II earned skills when they became a North Atlantic convoy navy. Significantly the French, who did not have that combat experience, developed and practiced a form of fleet attack and defense while the British lost theirs. But then the French navy expected to fight in the South Atlantic against their former colonies.

They could have begged for US radar equipped FRAM destroyers laid up in reserve. It would have taken months to get the RN up to snuff on picket destroyer gaz 67 tactics, and it would have been expensive. Smoke generators can be improvised, even the kind that can carry a form of Window in 1983 that can fool an Exocet. Or simple balloon decoys. The RN refused to fit such decoys to Atlantic electricity voltage in germany Conveyor because it would technically make her a warship. Guess what their other warships lacked?

I would have seized a forward anchorage, parked subs off the western Falklands and built an airbase outside Argentine air coverage (St Georges) and spent the 3-6 months to prepare properly (^^^) for an amphibious operation (Borrow or convert a STUFT tanker or 2 into an improvised flattop and DOUBLE load helo-lift, even if it has to be helos rented from the FRENCH in case one of the STUFT ships gets axed as happened. BUT that is just 20/20 and a bit of knowledge. it is a lot easier to do things the right way, even with the wrong equipment, than the wrong way with the alleged right electricity japan equipment. Note Maggie Thatcher’s cluelessness about her navy and her insistence that it do business right away? Never do a Halsey, when you have time to think it through.

The British did use layered air defence, and SAM traps in the Falklands. The Sea Dart was enough of a long range high level threat that the Argentinians chose to isntead come in low to avoid it, a choice that signifncantly reduced the accuracy and effectivness fo their weapons. Many of the Argentinian bombs did not arm because they were dropped gas 02 too low. Type 22 and Type 42 escorts were paired up at strategic entrances to the waterway to intercept incoming Argentine attacks with a combination of short range and long range SAMs. This was effective, and several Argentine aircraft were downed this way, though it exacted r gas constant chemistry a toll on the escorts that were put directly in the line of fire. The British though lacking modern CIWS systems, mounted a considerable number of older short range AA guns to their ships. And then there was the Sea Harrier CAP itself. That is four layers of air defence onion, some more effective than others. My argument is that the weakness of that first and most important layers was what lead to the losses, the SHAR was c gastronomie limonest not suited to long range CAP, and it showed. In large part it was the individual skill of FAA pilots that prevented disaster. Had they been equipped with more suitable weapons systems, they would have been able to mount a more effective defence, and establish true air superiority.

Operation Corporate was dogged by inadquacies of equipment for the British forces, that was made up for by a willingness and ability to adapt to the conditions as they were, and an offensive spirit. You are arguing that resolving some of those those equipment deficiencies would in fact make la gastronomie the situtation for them worse… which is quite frankly moonspeak.

That alone would make me think that you don’t really know what you are talking about. But then you went on to expound on mad ideas about establishing a forward base on ‘St George’s island’?, I can only assume you mean either South Georgia or King George island, both of which electricity year 4 would make a terrible place to build an airbase, (the mountainous glacial terrain, and awful weather only being the most obvious obstables) and would stretch the UK’s logsitical ability beyond the limit. I would be careful here, you are verging dangerously close into Frisian islands meme territory.

And then you electricity lesson plans 8th grade go off on one over my comment about the Royal Navy having trained to operate in the North Atlantic with MPA support, and were at a disadvantage without it. You didn’t even read what I wrote, and assumed I was talking about them taking Nimrods to the South Atlantic. Which is entirely the opposite of my argument. If they had more capable carriers, they would not have been so reliant on land based air, and would consequently bp gas prices chicago have performed better when deprived of it operating in the South Atlantic.

So I would guess that at minimum you would see them serving on into the early 90s and I can see them continuing to serve beyond that until the peace dividend kicks in (drawdown of RAF Germany and BAOR and forces reduced / returned to the UK) allowing for replacements to be budgeted in from the mid / late 90s with 2 larger hulls built in the noughties.

As for the light carriers – they probably would not electricity shock in the body be built with the QE and DoE serving the ASW role with a superior secondary strike role in any WW3 scenario – both for budgetary reasons and manpower issues – as it is the MOD would struggle to man both the carriers and the necessary escorts into the late 70s / early 80s and with Phantom and Buccaneer no need to navalise the Harrier.

Post a Falklands scenario we might see a modern HMS Bulwark style Helicopter commando carrier like OTL but without the Falklands we may see hp gas online registration a John Nott style axe descend upon the RN and the Royal Marines in the early 80s (to pay for Trident) with the fleet being severely degraded and the carriers placed into a long term reserve with one unit on limited duty and the FAA greatly reduced in operational aircraft and the Royal Marine Corps disappear altogether electricity 220 volts wiring as a fighting Brigade.

So if they survive the politics of the day they might serve on – but it’s possible that their existence ensures that the Falklands war does not happen – I appreciate that I cannot go through the looking glass and understand the mindset of the Argentine Junta as it is alien to me and they may very well convince themselves that even with Phantom/Bucc carrying carrier(s) Britain is not electricity lab activities interested in fighting and that they can do an Annexation of Goa invade and occupy the Falklands and other islands with no fallout from the international community.