Inspection panel – emerging lessons from involuntary resettlement – bretton woods project

• Seventh lesson: livelihood restoration works best when transitional support, development assistance, and culturally appropriate resettlement alternatives are provided

• Panel’s mandate is to respond to complaints, the sample may not represent the Bank’s overall experience, but similar issues identified in other reviews

• Ultimate policy goal of conceiving and executing resettlement as sustainable development programmes has not been achieved in many of the cases investigated

• Better analysis of the full economics of resettlement is needed beyond project costs and budgets, including what it takes to restore livelihoods

• need to do things better as a results of the reviews, identified at least four big areas, improvement in documentation, accessibility of resettlement documents, increase resources, help countries improve their resettlement guidelines

• risk assessment crucial for resettlement, checks and balances, technical expertise, skills development, institutional leadership, resettlement planning, management and supervision

• former WB staff, criticising with pain, feel as part of the WB, but need to as the performance is not what it should be – in particular in resettlement, a real sting on the record and performance of the WB

• involuntary resettlement, single most difficult social and economic part of the WB work – risks are indisputably the most toxic of all risks, because it means displacement, annihilation of the productive system, once a system is destroyed, it is creative destruction – need to be done in ways that are not destructive to the people

• 20 out of 21 projects covered by the report, have been found 90% as failing to do correct risk scoping, is inadequate – are bound to make a lot of mistakes, cannot manage risks that are not identified

• 50% of the identified projects with resettlement risks, had not listed resettlement in the risk assessment matrix, and not just one risk – misinforming the board and WB management

• important to identify the risks, entire WB policy not necessarily the risk, risk not caused by the WB, intrinsic caused by resettlement – creating land for industry, roads, etc

• at that time the WB board congratulated the task force, impoverishment risks and reconstruction, WB board endorsed it, addressed the most common risks

105 requests for investigation, brace yourself for Africa, will be more complaints. Ortega y gasset la rebelion de las masas Suggestion if expertise and more manpower is necessary, pay more attention to recruiting indigenous peoples understanding the culture and language.

From Nigeria, evictee of Badia East, in our case we were not resettled, was affected 2013, but to date many of us are sleeping outside, risks including no school, rape. Gasbuddy map People are dying every day in our community. Electricity facts label We have asked for the Panel to come, we were given the pilot process that didn’t work. Gas vs electric heat Women going into sex work to be able to take care of children. 76 gas credit card login No prior notice to any of the community members, the whole thing was new to us. Kite electricity generation We were supposed to benefit from the project, we should be given at least what we had, but we are still sleeping outside. Electricity in water experiment I had a home before the project, now I don’t have a home.

Avoiding resettlement in the first place, on lessons learned and identifying risks, WB not responsible for the risks but for mitigating the risks – but has the WB done enough to identify the risks and provide alternative analysis that would not require resettlement.

• we addressed with the pilot process, efforts toward immediate relief, aware the relief was insufficient – pilot in this case was the most useful outcome, but not enough

• there has been publications and round tables regarding the pilot, we will do an independent evaluation once we have three cases – now we have two

• WB against externalities, but have not been studied, should include in research plan and how they are dealt with in safeguard policies – how to construct the economics of resettlement

Q: Feasibility studies weren’t done or not taking in the social impact. Gas pain in chest People here come from these countries that could have helped, rather than superimposing so called expert from WB. Hp gas online payment Need to take into account social implications, not just figures.

• more use of local experts, WB since early 90’s support decentralisation, can’t always use local knowledge, need training and capacity building

• resettlement is when everything is happening at the same time. Grade 6 electricity unit plan Needs to be seen as an impact that is distinct, challenging to address this.

• huge responsibility on all of us, to make sure we do our best to address this as well to the best of ability. C gastronomie plateaux repas Now have more than a 100 staff working on these issues, in contrast to the early 90s – we have made progress, not enough, we are far behind where we should be. F gas regulations r22 Now recruiting more social scientists. Electricity and magnetism equations Will only work if all of us from our different perspectives engage – need to work together.

• setting up a working group with Oxfam, BIC and others, those interested should join this endeavour. K electric jobs test All of us need to pitch in to make it better.

Q: From DRC, based on presentation there seem to be a systemic issue within the WB regarding planning and implementation, what image is the WB portraying externally. Zyklon b gas canister for sale Lack of coordination probably impact on how projects are implemented on the ground. Specjalizacja z gastroenterologii Involuntary resettlement, by using this is it involuntary on both people on the ground and other, what is the ethic of this? Ethic on social impact, were not put into consideration when designing the project.

• how difficult is it for the social community Maninder leads to deal with resettlement, not a problem of the social community alone – this must be made clear

• WB VP for auditing wrote a report, saying that social specialists are not properly treated by their colleagues, sometimes not listened to, someone else writes the text – not a good treatment, they are not the culprits

• the problem of investing in resettlement is a task of the government, but have to convince the government that they have to invest in their own people