Ipso jure – intellectual property blog december 2018 gas oil mix ratio chart

##########

The Court of Appeal was asked to rule on whether it was permissible for Cadbury to re-categorise their colour trade mark, 2020876A, as a series of trade marks. gas mileage comparison Their wish to do this gives a striking illustration of how tricky it sometimes is to keep up with the constant changes to trade mark law and practice. The application claimed that the trade mark ‘consists of the colour purple’. grade 9 electricity Then the Registrar (who is also the Comptroller General) promulgated guidance on how to draft a colour trade mark application. In line with this guidance, Cadbury sought to amend their application (which was still pending) to add the words ‘ as shown applied to the packaging or labelling of goods covered by the registration’. The registrar replied on 9 September 1997 suggesting instead that the description (I think ‘representation’ is the correct word, going by the statute, though I would also argue that what the words are is in fact a description not a representation, which should to my mind be enough to knock the whole thing on the head) of the mark be amended to read: ‘The mark consists of the colour purple, as shown on the form of application, applied to the whole visible surface, or being the predominant colour applied to the whole visible surface, of the packaging of the goods.’ The conjunction ‘or’ seems to justify me in characterising this as a two-legged formulation.

The problem was that you cannot alter a trade mark after registration. gasbuddy nj It could be surrendered in part, but ony in respect of some of the goods and services for which it is registered – not for part of the description or representation of the trade mark. If however the trade mark could be treated as a two-part series, it would be possible to delete one part of it. Unfortunately, even when the Registrar suggested amendments to the application Cadbury had not opted to make it a series trade mark (and you can’t blame them, as the problem that eventually emerged was unforseen). la gas Could it just be treated as a series? After all, that description reads like a description of a series of trade marks. v gashi 2013 But the Court of Appeal (Floyd LJ giving the judgment of the Court) took the view that this would be a fiction – that the application was to register a single trade mark, which did not meet the requirements for clarity and precision. It looks to me like a bold attempt to rewrite history to save the trade mark – perhaps tabula in naufragio is a better expression, and certainly one that I’d like to see used a bit more often.

.eu TLD (1) .sucks (1) 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square (1) A Run Through Intellectual Property (4) A Theory of Law (1) A Whiter Shade of Pale (5) abbreviations (1) absolute grounds (1) Absolutism (26) abuse of dominant position (3) account of profits (1) ACTA (1) actavis v eli lilley (1) Advice (1) against intellecual monopoly (1) aggregation (2) Agreements (1) Albeniz (1) Alex Kozinski (2) alfredo ilardi (1) Animal Liberation (1) animals (1) apple (3) applications abandoned (1) appropriation art (1) arbitration (1) Architecture (1) archives (2) Arco lamps (1) Argentina (1) Arnold J (1) Arnold’s Principle (1) Arrows (1) art de vivre (1) article 102 TFEU (2) assignment (1) Asturias (1) Australia (5) authorised repairers (1) authors (1) Autodesk (1) Avatar (1) Bad faith (2) Bahamas (1) Bailii (1) Banksy (1) BBC (1) Belgium (2) bémol (1) Bently and Sherman (1) Bernard Olcott (1) Big Copyright (1) Big IP (1) BL v Armstrong (1) Black Sabbath (1) blackberry (1) Blue Book (1) Blueprinting (1) bogart (1) boldrin and levine (1) book review (8) books (1) Boyle (1) brand (1) breach of confidence (4) brexit (3) British Library (1) Bulgaria (2) bullying (4) business methods (2) business names (2) Cadbury (3) california (1) Canada (2) car manufacturer (1) careers (1) Cartels (1) celebrities (1) celebrity endorsement (1) character merchandising (1) charles clark (1) cheese (1) Chilling effects (1) China (3) CIPA (1) Cipriani (1) class headings (1) Classification (3) clenched fist (1) Cliff Richard (1) cliff’s law (1) Clinics (1) Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted (1) cloud computing (1) cluttering (1) co-existence agreements (1) co-ownership (1) colour trade mark (1) colours (2) comma splice (1) commission (1) commissioned designs (1) common origin (1) commonplace (2) Communication to the public (1) Community registered designs (8) Community Trade Mark (22) Company names (2) comparative advertising (1) Competition law (5) complex products (1) compulsory licensing (1) computer programs (2) conditional access (1) conferences (2) confidential information (4) consent (1) construction (1) continuing professional development (1) Contract (1) Copying (1) copyleft (1) Copyright (126) Copyright Licensing Agency (1) corpus query system (1) corresponding trade marks (1) costs (1) Counterfeits (2) Court of Appeal (3) Court of Justice (10) cpd (1) creativity (1) Criminal offences (6) crown copyright (1) da vinci code (1) damages (6) dan adin (1) Dangerous Dogs Act (1) data mining (1) data protection (4) Database right (4) databases (4) debate (1) defamation (1) Designs (22) dictionary of IP law (1) Digital locks (1) dilution (1) directive (1) disclosure (1) Distance selling (1) distinctiveness (3) DMCA (1) Domain dispute (1) domain names (3) double patenting (1) Douglas Adams (1) downloading (4) drafting (7) drumming (1) Duran Duran (1) duration (1) Dylan (3) Dyson (1) e-books (2) e-commerce (3) easy access initiative (1) ebay (1) education (2) EFF (1) elanco v mandops (1) electronic communications (1) Electronic Frontier Foundation (2) email (1) employee (1) energy drinks (1) enforcement directive (2) ententen12 (1) Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act (3) Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill (1) eran liss (1) estoppel (1) EU trade marks (1) European Commission (4) European Convention on Human Rights (1) European Parliament (1) European Patent Office (1) European Union (11) European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (2) evergreening (2) evidence (1) evidence-based policy-making (4) exceptions (3) exclusions (1) exclusive licensee (1) exhaustion (4) expansionism (1) expression (2) extended collective licensing (1) extension (2) Fair dealing (3) Fair use (3) famous belgians (1) famous mark (1) fees (2) Fellows and Associates (1) File-sharing (1) filemot (1) film (3) films (1) follow on claims (1) Football (1) format rights (1) format shifting (2) Formula One (2) forum shopping (1) France (3) FRAND (1) Fred Hirsch (1) free speech (1) freedom to operate (1) freeze-plus compromise (1) functionality (1) GDPR (1) Gebrauchsmuster (1) general court (1) General Public Licence (2) genericide (1) genetics (1) geographical indications (3) German grammar (1) germany (2) gLTD (1) GNU (2) good faith (1) goodwill (1) google (4) graffiti (1) Grammar (2) Green Bag (1) Green Party (1) groundless threats (5) guernsey (1) Hallstadt (1) Hargreaves Review (19) hart publishing (1) Hartlepool (1) Herchel Smith lecture (1) High Court UK (1) hooper report (3) hot topics (1) hub (1) Human rights (1) Human Rights Act (1) hyperlinks (1) IBIL (2) ICANN (1) ideas (3) identity (1) illiteracy (1) image rights (5) implied covenants (1) importation (1) improver (1) indemnity costs (1) india (9) Indian trademark applications (4) indian trademark office (2) Indian Trademark Registry (3) indian trademark system (1) individual character (1) industrial application (1) industrial designs (4) industrial explotation (1) infopaq (2) infringement (16) Injunction (2) insufficiency (1) INTA (1) Intellectual Property (7) Intellectual Property Bill (3) intellectual property enterprise court (2) Intellectual Property Fraud (1) Intellectual property lectures (1) Intellectual Property Office (2) interim injunction (1) international trade marks (1) internet (1) interpretation (3) invalidity (1) Inventive step (1) inventors (2) IP dispute (1) IP Lawcast (8) IP management (1) IP textbook (1) IP translator (1) IP Unzipped (1) IPse Dixit (2) IPTV boxes (1) Iron Maiden (1) Irritating Things (3) Isle of Man (1) Israel (1) Italy (1) james boyle (1) Jane Lambert (2) je ne sais quoi (1) JIPLP (1) jobs (1) joint liability (1) journalists (2) joy (1) judicial review (1) kirin amgen (1) Kitchin LJ (1) kraftwerk (1) L’Oreal v Bellure (1) Land grab (1) last date to revive (1) law commission (1) law of property (miscellaneous provisions) act 1994 (1) law reform (1) layers of protection (1) league table (1) legal deposit libraries (1) legal education (1) legal practice course (1) legal profession (1) legitimate interests (1) lending (1) leonard bernstein (1) levy (2) Lexis Nexis (1) libraries (2) licence (2) licensing (3) likelihood of confusion (6) linking (1) Litigation (3) Lodsys (1) london 2012 (1) lookalikes (2) lord hoffmann (1) lord neuberger (1) Lotus (1) Luxembourg (1) macaque (1) madrid protocol (1) magical powers of IP (1) making (1) making available (1) Mankind V Mercykind (1) marilyn monroe (1) Mark Webber (1) mathematics (1) Max Planck Institute (4) means and ends (8) Meet the Bloggers (1) Megamos Crypto (1) meltwater (1) mental acts (1) miles davis (1) miss recorder michaels (1) mobile phones (1) Moral rights (1) morality (3) moron in a hurry (1) moses pelham (1) motor industry (1) Motor Law (1) Motor Racing (2) motor vehicles (1) Music (6) musical combinations (1) musicals (1) nation branding (1) Nestlé (2) news (2) newspapers (1) Newswire (1) Ngaire Naffine (1) Nice Agreement (2) Ninth Circuit (1) NIPC (3) NLA (2) nominative fair use (1) nonpractising entities (1) Norwich Pharmacal order (1) novelty (1) Obviousness (3) ogooglebar (1) OHIM (1) Olcott International (2) olympics (1) Open source (2) opportunity knocks (1) Oppositions (1) Oracle (1) originality (3) Orin S. Kerr (1) orphan works (7) OSCLA (1) overclaiming (1) overlaps (1) overreaching (2) own name (2) ownership (4) Oxford Comma (1) Oxford IP Moot (2) Oxford Law School (1) oxford university (1) oxymoron (1) Paco de Lucia (1) paganini (1) Parallel Construction (1) parallel imports (4) parody (3) passing off (13) patent (5) patent attorneys (1) patent monetization entities (1) Patent Office (2) Patents (50) patents county court (4) Paternity right (1) patry (1) PDO (2) Peer to Patent (2) penalties (1) performers’ protection (1) permitted acts (4) personality rights (2) Peter Singer (1) PGI (1) photographs (3) plagiarism (2) pleonasm (1) Podcast (18) policy-based evidence-making (1) popular music (1) portability (1) Positional goods (1) practice (2) pre-emptive enforcement (1) press release (1) Privacy (5) private copying (4) private international law (1) Privy Council (1) Procol Harum (3) prohibited signs (1) Project Gutenberg (1) proms (1) property (1) protestantism (1) protocol on interpretation of Article 69 (2) public administration (1) public domain (3) public lending right (2) public policy (2) publicity rights (2) publisher’s association (1) publishing contract (1) purple colour (2) Python (1) Queen’s Speech (1) quotation (1) rachmaninov (1) Rand Paul (1) redbubble (1) Redskins (1) registered Community design (4) registered design (2) registered designs (3) registered designs act (2) registered designs rules (1) Registering Trademark in India (1) Relative Grounds (1) Relentless (1) remastering (1) repair (2) repair clause (1) repeal (1) reprography (1) reputation (1) research (1) reverse engineering (2) reversion (1) revocation (1) richard dreyfuss (1) right to repair (1) rights of audience (1) Rihanna (1) Ripping (1) robots (1) Roger Dean (1) Rolls-Royce (1) roman catholicism (1) rounding conventions (1) Rouse Legal (1) royalties (2) rubik’s cube (1) Russia (3) s.297A (1) sampling (1) samsung (1) scams (2) sculpture (1) Seattle (1) second medical use (1) section 52 (3) selfie (1) separate works (1) septic tanks (1) series (1) set aside (1) Shadow (1) shapes (3) shoes (1) significant figures (1) similarity (3) Simon Anholt (1) Singapore (1) Single Market (1) sir hugh laddie memorial lecture (1) Sky (1) slogan (1) small claims track (1) Social media (1) software (7) software patents (6) Solicitors (2) sound recordings (4) south africa (1) spain (1) Spanish Caravan (1) Spare parts (2) specialists (1) speculative invoicing (1) squeeze (1) Stackridge (2) standardised packaging (1) standards-essential patents (1) Stanley Fish (1) Star Wars (1) statements of the bleeding obvious (2) statutory instruments (1) steve reich (1) streaming (1) streisand effect (1) subconscious copying (1) substantial part (1) summary judgment (1) svensson (1) Swedish (1) Swiss style claims (1) tabula in naufragio (1) takedown (1) taste (1) tautology (1) taxis (1) Technical Board of Appeal (1) technology transfer (2) Television (1) term (4) The Beast (1) The Doors (1) the fundamental interconnectedness of all things (1) The Great Intellectual Property Trade-off (1) the sketch engine (1) The Warwick Boar (1) Tim Harford (1) time limits (1) Tip of the day (9) tobacco (1) trade mark (2) trade mark infringement (4) trade mark use (1) Trade marks (86) trade marks rules (3) trade secrets (3) trademark (3) Trademark Infringement (1) trademark rules 2017 (1) trademarks (3) Tradename (1) transformative (1) trendy but pointless (1) trips (1) trolls (8) truth (1) turtles (1) umberto eco (1) unified patent court (5) unitary patent (7) united kingdom (1) United States (7) Universities (1) unregistered design right (8) UPLS (1) USA (4) Use (2) usedSoft (2) Utility models (1) validity (3) variations (1) Vernor (1) video lecture (1) Volkswagen AG (1) Vysotsky (1) wall (1) WeAdmire (1) weak trade marks (1) Website (1) Well-known mark (1) well-known mark in India (2) Wensleydale (1) west side story (1) whisky (1) WIPO (1) WIPR (1) withdrawal (1) world wide web (1) writing (2) Yorkshire (1) youtube (2) Zen Republic (1)