Jamie dimon shows why bitcoin is not the future electricity year invented

##########

From December 17, 2017 to that same date in 2018, Bitcoin fell in value from electricity icons free $19,870 to $3,391 and became little more than a plaything for day traders. The price then hovered in the $3,300 to $3,400 range or about 50 days, until Bitcoin showed a price rise to $4,157 on February 23 of this year (as of this writing, it had fallen back to about $3,800).

What happened is that Bitcoin was hit with another rash of speculation. A Vice-President of Blockchain and Digital Currencies at IBM mused that someday chapter 7 electricity Bitcoin might hit $1 million. This statement was premised on a lot of assumptions, not the least of which being that the world’s financial institutions would adopt Bitcoin gas bloating nausea as their cryptocurrency of choice to settle financial transactions.

But here is the problem with that: Nobody holds an enforceable general patent on cryptocurrency. What this means is that anybody who wants electricity bill cost to create a cryptocurrency (which isn’t particularly difficult) can do so. In fact, there have been hundreds of cryptocurrencies created in the last few years, all but a few of which were nothing more than outright scams. There is nothing that prevents the world’s largest financial institutions electricity videos for students from creating their own cryptocurrencies to settle trades, and to keep those cryptocurrencies completely within a non-public closed loop so that they are gas constant in kj not subject to the widespread market manipulation and rampant speculation that ruins the utility of Bitcoin.

In fact, the world’s largest financial institutions are doing exactly that. Eschewing Bitcoin, JPMorgan Chase has introduced its own cryptocurrency, called “JPM Coin”, to handle purely-internal transactions within the company and for international transactions to substantially reduce JPM’s use of the traditional Swift network. Other banks are either starting to use, or experimenting with, their gas jewelry own internal cryptocurrencies. The advantage to these propriety cryptocurrencies is obvious: The bank itself can regulate their grade 9 electricity module use and value.

Which is all very bad news for Bitcoin, since — as mentioned above — its success ultimately relies upon its adoption by the large financial institutions, but they are all going their another way instead. At best, Bitcoin has a chance to be the cryptocurrency-of-choice for consumer adoption, but it doesn’t seem to be making much progress there either, mainly because gas oil ratio formula of its well-earned reputation for periods of horrendous volatility, multi-million hacker thefts of Bitcoin due to the negligence of its unregulated clearinghouses, and amenability to widespread gas under 3 dollars price manipulation because it isn’t regulated by anybody.

Much more likely, nations will start introducing their own government-backed and government-regulated cryptocurrencies to serve electricity storage costs the role as electronic currencies (paper money has been headed for extinction anyway), and large banks will form consortiums and do the same thing with their own proprietary cryptocurrencies that they can control.

Which is all to say that the future of cryptocurrency is bright, but not so much for Bitcoin. Indeed, the entire concept of currency will very likely look much different twenty years from gas out game directions now than it does today. The industry will also substantially benefit from the rise of artificial intelligence to keep track of cryptocurrency and spot anomalies in real time. Companies gas 87 that provide the technology to manage cryptocurrency, such as IBM, are going to get very rich in the process, but that wealth is not going to come from Bitcoin.