Justin a. chiarodo blank rome llp electricity in the body symptoms


Justin Chiarodo focuses his practice on all aspects of federal, state, and local procurement law. He has spent his entire career helping leading and emerging government contractors successfully navigate high-stakes litigation, compliance, and regulatory matters. Recent electricity generation in california engagements include the successful defense of a $6.7 billion award in a major tactical wheeled vehicle procurement, managing the government contracts aspects of a $250 million acquisition of a leading digital services provider, and defeating a $10 million False Claims Act suit based on the public disclosure bar.

Justin has represented contractors in more than 50 bid protests before all major protest forums, including procuring agencies, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), and the Court of Federal Claims, as well as in protests at the state and local level. In addition to defending contract awards, he has a proven track record of obtaining injunctive relief gas efficient suv 2008, corrective action, favorable merits decisions, and significant settlements on behalf of clients. With more than 20 published decisions, Justin’s significant protest wins include Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 709 (2016) (successfully defeating preliminary injunction alleging range of protest allegations involving administrative record exceeding 300,000 pages in major defense procurement); AllWorld Language Consultants, Inc., 2012 (2016 CPD ¶ 12) (sustained protest of GSA Schedule electricity in salt water experiment contract award where putative awardee’s FSS contract did not meet solicitation requirements); and Wyle Laboratories, Inc., (2014 CPD ¶ 16) (precedent-setting sustained decision regarding the impact of corporate transaction on proposal evaluations).

Justin maintains a nationwide False Claims Act (“FCA”) defense practice focused on counseling, government investigations, and litigation. Justin has represented clients in False electricity per kwh Claims Act investigations and litigation in the Eastern District of Virginia, District for the District of Columbia, Northern and Southern Districts of Illinois, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Arkansas, and Western District of Washington. This extends to the defense of both companies and individuals in qui tam litigation. He has successfully resolved False Claims Act matters implicating hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure. Among other issues, Justin has handled False Claims Act matters and investigations involving logistics contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan, technology alliances, export control issues, defective pricing, Trade Agreements Act compliance, and the General Services Administration (“GSA”) Schedule.

Complementing his False Claims Act and investigations work, Justin has helped clients develop and strengthen ethics, compliance, and training programs, and has gas 66 worked to ensure (or reinstate) contractor eligibility for federal programs. Justin has represented contractors before a wide range of federal agencies in responsibility matters, including the Army, Air Force, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Interior, Department of Energy, Defense Logistics Agency, and Small hair electricity song Business Administration. He has represented contractors in suspension and debarment matters arising from civil and criminal investigations, and works closely with members of the Firm’s white collar criminal defense and investigations practice in criminal investigations involving government contracts.

Justin seeks creative and early resolutions wherever possible in government contracts disputes. Where litigation is necessary, he brings experience representing government contractors at the trial gas ninjas and appellate levels in a broad range of contentious civil matters, from termination claims to breaches of contract to federal takings actions. He has served as lead counsel in government contracts disputes in both state and federal courts, and before arbitral forums. Justin has appeared before the Civilian and Armed Services Boards of Contract Appeals, Court of Federal Claims, and Federal Circuit, and has considerable experience litigating government contracts disputes in the Eastern District of Virginia and Virginia State Courts.

Justin assists government contractors gas jet and their investors in evaluating and structuring mergers, acquisitions, and investments involving government contractors and government contracts. His experience extends to the fully panoply of issues arising in connection with investments and transactions involving government contracts, including small business program eligibility, due diligence, facility and personnel security issues , the mitigation of foreign ownership, control, and influence, and Anti-Assignment Act and novation matters.

Justin counsels clients on a wide range of government contract and regulatory issues, including disclosure obligations under the Mandatory Disclosure Rule, unsolicited proposals, cybersecurity, mergers and acquisitions, domestic preference provisions under the Buy American and Trade Agreements Acts, export control issues, conflict of interest issues and “revolving door” restrictions, small business and socio-economic programs, cost accounting, government audits, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, procurement integrity issues, and the GSA Schedule.

• Served as trial counsel for the former owner of a nuclear power gsa 2016 new orleans plant in a 13-day trial securing a $40 million judgment against the United States for its failure to dispose of nuclear waste as required by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (“NWPA”). It was the first such case addressing damages related to the post-NWPA sale of a nuclear power plant.

• Represented VT Griffin Services, Inc. in a dispute arising from the Army’s failure to pay millions of dollars for work at the second largest Army installation in the United electricity in human body wiki States. Secured payment from the Army and favorably resolved a subcontractor’s related lawsuit in the Eastern District of Virginia through motions practice and mediation.

• Served as lead counsel on behalf of TKC Communications, LLC in a breach-of-lease action in Virginia state court that involved a parallel federal takings action resulting from the government’s holdover tenancy. Successfully argued against the lessor’s efforts to obtain hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages from his client in the state action and helped electricity estimated bills negotiate a favorable settlement involving his client, the United States, and the lessor in the federal action.