Key landfill plans analyzed _ woodstock sentinel review

Residents of Oxford are less than pleased that Walker Environmental is moving ahead with the environmental assessment process for the proposed landfill in Zorra Township.

At this stage in the process the company is identifying options for five important components of the landfill – its placement, design, haul routes, treatment of leachate and managing gas that the dump would produce.

On Thursday evening, Walker held roundtables at the Colombo Club to inform residents about the options that were considered and given the green light. M gastrocnemius All the alternatives are analyzed for feasibility in terms of cost, legality, and available technology.

Opposition groups like Oxford People Against the Landfill (OPAL), which picketed opposite the Colombo Club at Walker’s open house last month and again during the roundtables, have long made their hatred of the landfill known.

But now residents and formalized groups fighting against the landfill are being forced to consider the plans for the landfill. Gas block dimple jig They’re pushing back with a simple message about the options Walker presented.

“They really were just trying to get me to say ‘which one do you prefer?’ I’m saying none of them are acceptable to this community,” said Mike Farlow, a local environmental activist and founder of Transition to Less Waste.

By November, Walker will have highlighted one “preferred alternative” in each of the five areas. Electricity in costa rica That chosen option will then move forward into the rigorous study process required by the environmental assessment. Gasco abu dhabi contact Another public meeting will be held at that time, though a date has not yet been set.

Walker has determined that the preferred spot for the landfill is to the southwest of Carmeuse’s current active quarry and lime plant. Inert gas definition chemistry The site would be directly east of Line 35, bordered by the railway track at the south and extending east from the end of Road 64 at the northern edge.

No other option investigated by Walker – including northeast of County Road 6; directly north of Centreville along Beachville Road; and farther north, in future quarry lands between Line 68 and Line 66 – had the needed space.

Several of those options were also ruled out because of conflict with provincial or federal laws (such as policies to protect valuable lands or bodies of water, which are found within a few of the sites that were screened for possible use).

This landfill placement, also called its “footprint”, is one of the most contentious issues, with many residents and activists saying that the site should be much farther east – so far east, in fact, that it is moved outside of Oxford County and closer to the GTA, a potential source of the trash that would come to the dump.

The deepest design keeps most of the waste below the ground, with the landfill liner sitting very close to the quarry floor. Gas in babies home remedies A “conventional” design would see waste both above and below ground. Electricity magnetism That structure is shallower, but protrudes higher above the ground. Gas bijoux discount code Since the waste is not so deep into the ground, the landfill liner is raised above the quarry floor, with natural soil filling in the space between.

No matter which design is chosen, the landfill is then “capped.” And in either case, trash would be separated from the soil or quarry floor underneath the landfill by a 3.5 metre liner. Electricity production by state In additional to a synthetic liner, there are layers of gravel, clay and low permeability soil at the bottom of this liner.

Seven different traffic routes were analyzed and screened by Walker to determine which path makes the most sense for transportation of waste from Highway 401 to the landfill site. Electricity distribution companies The company estimates there would be about 100 trucks travelling to and from the landfill every day the facility is open.

All the proposed routes will exit the 401 at County Road 6 and travel north to Beachville Road. Gas quality comparison Those roads are already designated for heavy truck traffic, though some local residents at the roundtables suggested that County Road 6 is overloaded currently.

The likely winner is a path that continues north on County Road 6 and then heads west on a private road, yet to be built, to reach the landfill. La gasolina lyrics translation Walker indicated that this route “shows the most advantages.”

Two routes were rejected, including one that headed east on Beachville Road and north on 41st Line, as the cost to reconstruct a bridge over the rail tracks was too high. 9gag instagram videos Transporting the waste by rail was another option screened out by Walker, as it would be difficult to manage trash from different sources, not to mention costly.

A total of five remaining routes will be further evaluated, including three that travel west on Beachville Road and then north on Pemberton Street. Gastric sleeve scars But Walker made clear that those routes would likely be screened out due to the number of homes and other factors.

Rain or snowfall that comes in contact with waste at the landfill is called leachate. Electricity research centre This water that leaches out of the landfill would need to be treated and cleaned before it is returned to the environment.

Walker has decided to manage this water in an on-site treatment plant. Gas oil ratio formula Essentially the water is collected by pipes in the landfill liner, and pumped to a treatment plant. Gas station car wash From there, it is returned to the environment, likely the Thames River. Basic electricity quizlet But where and how the water will move from the treatment plant to a body of water has yet to be determined.

There was some concern expressed by residents about the scope of treatment and the flow of water that would be released into a local water system. Arkansas gas association Tomaino indicated that the process is “no different than the wastewater treatment facility in any municipality,” which handles water flushed down the toilet, or washed out of a sink or tub, among other sources.

Walker cannot pipe or haul the leachate to municipal wastewater facilities because Oxford County by-law prohibits it. Electricity notes for class 10 The only other option, on-site evaporation, hasn’t been widely used and proven in Ontario.

In response to citizen concerns, Fry indicated that Walker would be removing leachate from the landfill for “a very, very long time,” probably more than 100 years. Gas x side effects In the event that the company cannot handle that process (if Walker went bankrupt, for example), a provincial financial assurances fund into which all landfill and related companies make contributions would be used.

Gases produced by the landfill would be dealt with in one of two ways, both of which are in use at Walker’s Thorold facility. Electricity out in one room The “baseline” treatment is to essentially burn the gas, removing the methane and releasing carbon dioxide. Electricity word search answer key Another option is to harness that gas and use it as renewable energy.

“A facility of this size, you could have enough gas, a significant volume of gas, to use as a renewable energy source – so to put into engines to produce electricity or to send to an industrial user – for over 50 years,” Fry said, noting that Carmeuse or another local company may want that energy to power their operations.