Largest canadian population alternate history discussion gas utility boston


In any such enquiry I’d recommend Dathi Thorfinsson’s Canada wank, which you can find here. Succintly: if the USA can be made to lose the *War electricity pick up lines of 1812 badly enough (which, the author argues, isn’t especially implausible) and if the USA can turn fairly anti-immigrant as part of a populist backlash, Canada could include a very large proportion of the territory of the OTL United States and become (if with pro-immigrant policies) a more popular immigrant destination than the USA. If I recall correctly, that TL has Canada as set to overtake the mini-United States (vastly territorially reduced compared f gas regulations to OTL) in population sometime in the 20th century. So that’s probably the highest Canadian population for a country that would definitely count as really ‘Canada’ (unless one chooses to be picky enough grade 9 static electricity test to define Canada as needing to have the borders of OTL Canada, rather than its general national traits).

Redirecting the millions of 19th-century British migrants who went IOTL to the United States to Canada is almost certainly the easiest part (making the United States much more hostile to the British can greatly change migration patterns in that respect), but, short of something to enormously increase emigration from Great Britain, that’s probably not enough to make for a really gas mask bong how to use huge Canadian population, though it could make for one much larger than OTL (since, with a population so small as that of 19th-century Canada, an increase in population even by small numbers grade 6 electricity unit ontario would be an increase by a fairly high factor).

Depending on what counts as ‘Canada’… if you avert American independence completely (though I’m not sure if that’s possible with a 1763 PoD), then given that territories in the OTL United States were made part of Quebec by the British and later taken by the Americans in the American Revolutionary War, one could imagine ‘Canada’ emerging as a large unit (Quebec plus Rupert’s Land plus perhaps Alaska nicked from the Russians, maybe plus e payment electricity bill bangalore other lands too) within über-British America, including very large numbers of people who would IOTL be Americans. Maybe that might give a population even higher than the first case (I’m not at all sure) but such a country might not count gas hydrates energy as really ‘Canada’.

The point that seems to be missed here is that a country doesn’t need to be self-sufficient in terms of food. Canada, in particular, has a certain large country to its south which would be perfectly able to sell it lots of food, even if we discount its links to the British Empire v gas llc with the consequent economic connections elsewhere in the world. Yes, of course it’s preferable to be self-sufficient, but it’s not necessary. If a country is relatively rich, it can sell other things and thus buy food; there’s no compulsion for self-sufficiency, merely an economic advantage in it.

Back to the intent of the OP, it would gas vs diesel generator of course depend on when the Canadian population diverges from its OTL numbers, and also on the mechanism by which this is achieved. The easiest mechanisms, i.e. where (a) Canada gets land that the US got IOTL and/or (b) Anglo-American relations are poorer and thus cause lots of Britons who went to the United States IOTL to go to Canada ITTL, will also have e gasoline major impacts on US relations with its northern neighbour beyond the impact of the increased Canadian population. But in general, if Anglo-American relations were fairly cordial (and they almost always were), I’d think that neither side would maintain a very large army on each other’s borders (except in the time of the alt-ACW, and electricity kwh calculator tensions there, as OTL proved, can be solved even if they seem to come to the very brink of war as long as there are no actual strong conflicts of interest post-war) as a matter of expense. (A relevant disclaimer, though, is that I’m one of those who tend to strongly doubt the plausibility of the various Anglo-American-war-in-the-1890s kind of TLs, ones usually focusing on Venezuela and other such things; neither side had enough invested in them and there was too much of a habit, in particular on the British side, of conciliation nyc electricity consumption for such poor Anglo-American relations to be realistic.) I’d think that the butterflies in Europe (diplomatic relations, wars et cetera) of thus greatly strengthening the British Empire would far outfly those in the United States, to the extent that most of the effects in the US would be knock-on effects of the changes in Europe (e.g. probably butterflying WW1, with such an early PoD as required to get a really big electricity jeopardy Canadian population).