Maegan adkins-barras 5 fast facts you need to know heavy.com electricity invented in homes

#############

The video, which is disturbing but not nearly as graphic and objectionable as many shared on platforms every day, has been scrubbed and myriad media stations have refused to show it. It’s difficult to locate a stand-alone copy, though students have probably shared it on Snapchat. Still, KLFY is one of the few that has aired it. You can see it here.

Scott Police Chief Chad Leger told local media the boy in the fight video who struck his head is fine. The fight between two students began Tuesday morning at Acadiana High School. Kids pulled out their o gascon cameras phones. One sent it to his mom, Maegan Barras, who posted it to Facebook as apparent commentary to note what’s going on in the school. Her friends said she was concerned about what was going on at her school and was questioning the response from officials. The boys were both arrested and charged, one with second-degree battery and the one that was knocked down and hit his head on a concrete bench was charged with disturbing the peace.

But the boys were not the only ones who were arrested. Police decided to charge Adkins-Barras with unlawful posting of criminal activity for notoriety and publicity. That statute, passed electricity and circuits in 2008 and updated in 2011, requires the person doing the posting to be involved in the criminal activity, which Adkins Barras would arguably be deemed to not be involved. Her son took the video and sent it to her. And he was likely not the only person to film the melee.

During their investigation of the incident, Scott Police Department’s School Resource Officers found that Maegan Adkins-Barras, 32, of Broussard, obtained a video of the fight that occurred on the campus of Acadiana High School on Tuesday, February 19th from her juvenile son’s cell phone. Adkins-Barras admitted that once she received the video from her son, she then posted the video to social media where it was shared repeatedly.

A physical altercation between two juveniles in the Commons Area of Acadiana High School was reported to the School Resource Officers and school administration on Tuesday, February 19th. During the altercation, one of the juveniles threw a punch causing the other juvenile to fall and strike his head on one of the concrete benches in the area before falling to the ground. The juvenile was transported to a local medical facility where he was electricity jokes treated. One juvenile is being charged with Second Degree Battery while the other is charged with Disturbing the Peace by Fighting.

“But more so, they’ll have to establish that she posted it to social media to establish notoriety or publicity,” he said. “Just because you post something on social media doesn’t mean you’re looking for that. You can share ideas and thoughts. I think they’ll have a serious constitutional problem with this crime. I think it just smells of desperation in the sense that they’re trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.”

Attorney Scott Sternberg, who handles First Amendment and media cases, told The Advocate, “She obtained the video lawfully. “This is something we do all the time for the media. If we obtained this video, there’s a good chance we would post it. That concerns me. This sets up an extremely difficult precedent that somebody could be arrested for posting a video they lawfully obtained.”

Criminal defense lawyer Kirk Piccione told the newspaper, “The Scott Police Department could have liability for making a false arrest. The courts give a lot of leeway to police making arrests, but at some point, you get to the stage where there is simply no support, no probable cause, no reasonable person could agree that probable cause existed — unless there is evidence that she is a principal or an accessory.”

The ACLU attorney told Nola.com that he couldn’t find any previous cases involving the law that resulted in convictions. “Hamilton said the law itself appears ripe for challenges for infringement of freedom of speech and freedom of the press. He also said some of the language in the statute is vague about what types of video might be illegal mp electricity bill payment online indore to post,” the newspaper wrote.

The county prosecutor’s office will make a final decision about charges. According to The Advocate, authorities have suggested another charge could be applied, saying that Barras possibly violated a law that makes it illegal to share images of juveniles without parental consent, but the newspaper said no such law could be found. A source in the district attorney’s office added “additional charges may follow.”

One charge found by Borghardt is for “unlawful possession of videotape of protected persons,” another rarely used law that lists protected persons as “any person who is a victim of a crime” or a “witness in a criminal proceeding” who is “under the age of 17 years.” The law says it is illegal to “knowingly and intentionally” possess or distribute videos of protected persons.

“I am generally anti-over sharing gas hydrates wiki on social media and very pro-police, but the police are justifying this arrest overnight stay in jail by stating ‘Parents who receive information concerning criminal activity on school campuses are urged to contact their local police department or school administration. Posting videos and photos of illegal activity on social media is against the law in the State of Louisiana,” which the law does not support.

“Either you have evidence that this mom was an accessory to the crime actually recorded in the video she posted and just worded your own Facebook post explaining the law very poorly (and should be corrected) or you are overlooking a key component of this law for some as of now unknown reason which at this point should result in those at fault being terminated at the very least. If law misapplied you still have time to let this mom sleep in her bed and with the rest of her family tonight. People who Overshare and/or post something someone people feels is distasteful on social media should be blocked, unfollowed, or even shamed by others who need to feel better about themselves not arrested by the police.”

Attorney Greg Doucette, a North Carolina criminal defense attorney who has gained a following on Twitter and on his podcast, Fsckemall, by talking about national legal matters, reacted to the arrest by tweeting, “Holy sh*t. … The statute is definitely unconstitutional IMO. Would make it illegal to film protests if it were enforceable.” Doucette added that because she does not appear to have been a principal or accessory, “she’d be entitled to an acquittal just because the statute doesn’t fit. But it’s also wildly overbroad as written.”

A. It shall be unlawful for a person who is either a principal or accessory to a crime to obtain an image of the commission of the crime using any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device and to transfer that image obtained power in costa rica during the commission of the crime by the use of a computer online service, Internet service, or any other means of electronic communication, including but not limited to a local bulletin board service, Internet chat room, electronic mail, or online messaging service for the purpose of gaining notoriety, publicity, or the attention of the public.

(1) The obtaining, use, or transference of such images by a telephone company, cable television company, or any of its affiliates, an Internet provider, or commercial online service provider, or to the carrying, broadcasting, or performing of related activities in providing telephone, cable television, Internet, or commercial online services or in the production, exhibition, or presentation of an audiovisual work in any medium, including but not limited to a motion picture or television program.

According to the Louisiana State Legislature’s website, the bill was first introduced in 2008 by a bipartisan group of lawmakers. It was passed unanimously in both the state house and senate before being signed into law by then-Governor Bobby Jindal. The law provides an exemption for internet service providers, law enforcement and the news media. But it does not define what “news media” is.

Norton, when asked why someone would want to put a video of a crime on the internet, said, “In the world that we live in today there are many p gasket 300tdi, many things that are going on with our young people. … When I look at the internet and I see young people taking the opportunity to gather against one person and how they commit battery by beating this person and at the same time you look on TV and the internet and you see their pictures throughout the country and their pictures in the newspaper all over TV.”