March 20, 2019 the henry j. kaiser family foundation v gashi 2013


“…According to draft documents acquired by The Guardian, the U.S. delegation came into this week’s [U.N. Commission on the Status of Women (CSW)] meetings intending to ‘water down’ commitments to the health and well-being of women and girls as well as remove the word ‘gender’ from the commission’s documents. At issue is the 1995 Beijing declaration and platform for action, a landmark blueprint outlining priorities for the global empowerment of women and girls, including protection from gender-based violence and access to basic reproductive health care. While the agreement is non-binding, advocates often use it to pressure governments into loosening restrictions electricity deregulation wikipedia on women’s lives. Tarah Demant, director of Amnesty International’s gender, sexuality, and identity program told Rewire.News that U.S.-led efforts to undercut support for the Beijing declaration failed late Monday. ‘We are deeply troubled by the attempts of the U.S. delegation to the U.N. to change the language of commitment to the Beijing Platform for Action from “reaffirm” to “make note of,”‘ Demant said in a statement to Rewire gas vs diesel towing.News…” (Burns, 3/19).

“An uptick in the rate of newly confirmed Ebola cases in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s outbreak continued [Tuesday], with the country’s health ministry reporting eight illnesses in four locations. In other outbreak developments, the World Health Organization (WHO) African regional office in a weekly report [Tuesday] noted two more infections in health workers, and though Katwa is still the hot spot, seven health zones that have reported recent cases are points of concern…” (Schnirring, 3/19).

“The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo was the topic of a hearing before the Senate Appropriations Labor, Health and Human Services Subcommittee…, highlighting successes and failures in the fight against it. … Experts testified that U.S. investments in biomedical research and global health security have led to a vaccine administered to more than 87,000 people. It has also contributed to increased surveillance and preparedness efforts in neighboring nations, greatly reducing the risk of a pandemic — all things at risk if a White House budget proposal for 2020 passes…” (Galford, 3/19).

“Cyclone Idai, the storm that battered cities, submerged homes, and killed at least 200 people in southeastern Africa, may prove to be one of the worst weather-related disasters ever in the Southern Hemisphere, a United Nations official said on Tuesday. Officials with global aid groups and in Mozambique, where the storm hit hardest, are k electric jobs test only beginning to reckon with its destruction. Potentially 1.7 million people were in the direct path of the cyclone, the United Nations estimated on Tuesday, and rain is forecast to continue in parts of the region for several days…” (Yuhas, 3/19).

“The full scale of the devastation caused by Tropical Cyclone Idai in south-east Africa is becoming clearer, the U.N. said on Tuesday, warning that the emergency ‘is getting bigger by the hour.’ … ‘We are talking about a massive disaster right now where hundreds of thousands — in the millions of people — (are) potentially affected,’ said Jens Laerke from the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). ‘We need all the logistical support that we can possibly get’…” (3/19).

“The tropical cyclone that tore through Mozambique and other Southern African nations has spotlighted how the combination of rapid urbanization and climate change is turning deadly in some of the world’s poorest places. … The storm and the destruction it has left in its path have renewed questions about how poor countries with long coastlines are adapting electricity load shedding to climate change — and whether the rest of the world is helping enough…” (Bariyo/Steinhauser, 3/19).

“A panel convened by the World Health Organization said it would be ‘irresponsible’ for scientists to use gene editing for reproductive purposes, but stopped short of calling for a ban. The experts also called for the U.N. health agency to create a database of scientists working on gene editing. The gas in back symptoms recommendation was announced Tuesday after a two-day meeting in Geneva to examine the scientific, ethical, social, and legal challenges of such research…” (Keaten/Cheng, 3/19).

“A World Health Organization advisory committee on editing human DNA will ask the United Nations agency to establish a global registry of all such research, recommend that editors of scientific journals not publish any unregistered studies, and ask science funders to require that their grantees register their studies, committee co-chair Dr. Margaret Hamburg told reporters on Tuesday. The registry would include studies that edit the DNA of eggs, sperm, and early embryos, called germline editing, and those that edit adult cells for the purpose of curing disease, which is much less controversial and is the focus of all genome-editing companies…” (Begley, 3/19).

“…Access to safe and legal abortion is as relevant to gender equality as women’s equal access to education, employment, adequate food, and housing — it puts women’s and girls’ lives, health, and human rights at the core of human development. [The U.N. Commission on the Status of Women (CSW)] should be a space for advancing women’s rights; not a platform for their destruction. The Trump administration’s attempt to dismantle the global commitment to advancing women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights is stunningly out of step with international agreements and treaties that have consistently called for the full electricity production in chad realization of sexual and reproductive rights, including access to safe, legal abortion. … As language negotiations step up next week inside the U.N., advocates for sexual and reproductive rights must continue to lobby their governments to oppose pressure by the U.S. government to eradicate progress on women’s rights. … We cannot allow the Trump administration to dismantle a human rights framework that puts women electricity merit badge worksheet’s health and well-being at its center…” (3/19).

“…Earlier this month, [WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus] unveiled reforms that … are aimed at achieving the WHO’s so-called ‘triple billion’ targets … The actual details of how and when most of these changes will go into effect have yet to be announced, but these reforms have the potential to address a number of the WHO’s shortcomings … First, by building teams that incorporate staffers at all different levels and encouraging movement among previously siloed offices, WHO staff could become more attuned to local issues. … Second, these reforms could increase the WHO’s technical capacities and capabilities to respond to an increasing array of issues. … Third, these reforms help focus the mission of the WHO, which simply does not have the capacity to do everything and has frequently found itself responding to situations rather than setting its own agenda. … Yet at the same time, it is important to view these reforms with a degree of skepticism. First, they fail to address the most glaring weakness in the gas x strips after gastric sleeve WHO’s structure: the independence and autonomy of its six regional offices … Second, … these reforms do not address how the organization should interact with [other] major global health players … Finally, … the fact remains that the WHO fundamentally lacks resources … If they succeed, Tedros’ proposed reforms could be his signature accomplishment. If they fail, though, they could further damage the WHO’s standing within the global community” (3/19).