Mathias v. caterpillar, inc._ federal district court enforces forum selection clause contained in erisa plan _ the national law review

A federal district court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania transferred an ERISA lawsuit against Caterpillar Inc. Bp gas station to the Northern District of Illinois after finding the forum selection clause contained in the governing plan was valid and enforceable. Electricity and magnetism worksheets 8th grade In so ruling, the court deepened an already existing split among district courts as to the enforceability of these provisions. Electrical supply company near me In September 2012, Plaintiff George Mathias, who lived in Hanover, Pennsylvania, retroactively retired from Caterpillar effective October 1, 2009 after having been on long-term disability for many years. E payment electricity bill maharashtra Due to an administrative error, Mathias’ retroactive retirement was not processed correctly and for several years he was undercharged for his long-term disability insurance premiums as an incorrectly classified active employee. Gas variables pogil worksheet answer key After Caterpillar corrected the error, Mathias was sent a bill for the difference in the premium amounts he paid and the premium amounts owed as a retired participant. Gas pump heaven Mathias failed to pay the balance and his benefits were terminated. Q gas station He subsequently filed suit in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, seeking reinstatement of his health insurance benefits among other things. F gas regulations 2015 Caterpillar moved to transfer the case on the ground that the plan’s forum selection clause requires actions seeking to recover plan benefits or to enforce a participant’s rights under ERISA be brought in the Northern District of Illinois. Gas house pike frederick md The court determined that the forum selection clause was valid and enforceable because: (1) the clause was fundamentally fair and enforceable due to Mathias’ voluntary acceptance of the offered benefits and having been on notice that the plan contained the venue selection clause; and (2) no extraordinary circumstances existed militating against the clause’s enforcement. Electricity nightcore lyrics The court also observed that forum selection clauses further ERISA’s goal of promoting a uniform administrative scheme by having the same court decide all cases relating to a single plan, and also found Mathias’ claim of physical and financial limitations irrelevant to its analysis. Gas tax in new jersey The court recognized that its holding was at odds with rulings in other courts that forum selection clauses in ERISA plans are unenforceable because they improperly restrict “ready access to the Federal courts” by limiting venue options available to litigants. Electricity quiz ks3 In rejecting these rulings, the court concluded that ERISA’s policy that litigants have “ready access to the Federal courts” was not intended to supersede the general enforceability of forum selection clauses. Gas prices going up or down Thus, a plan may contractually limit the number of locations where an action “may be brought.”

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. Electricity and magnetism notes The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Gaz 67 dakar Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. Gas and water No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. Electricity worksheets grade 6 The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. Gas mask ark NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. Gas monkey monster truck body The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Electricity lessons grade 6 Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Impact of electricity in the 1920s Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Gasket t 1995 Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Electricity synonyms Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558 Telephone (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.