No minister where to now, new zealand gas under 3 dollars


In our hearts I think we all felt that such a thing could not happen in New Zealand. Our distance and isolation made us a meaningless target and our general relaxed culture did not generate the sorts of fiery hatreds turned into actions electricity trading hedge funds that we see in other countries. In our heads we looked at how tough it would be for an organised cell to get here and then make plans and preparations in a country with such a small population that most are only two or three degrees of separation away from knowing someone and what they’re up to. Even having 1.5 million guns in circulation but such a low level of gun crime, especially by legal gun owners, made it clear how peaceable a people we were.

But in our heads we also knew it was possible, even inevitable. We are not so different from the rest of humanity. I recall a conversation several years ago with some National-voting friends, quite Right-wing, after yet another mass shooting in the USA. They’re ignorant of firearms and talked of machine guns, as is usually the case with such people. I had to explain to them what a semi-automatic was and how I could buy one here very much the same as in America, but without the high capacity magazines. They were a little shocked but I explained the licencing procedure and said that gun owners gas engineer salary tended to keep an eye on one another, so the chances of a nutter slipping through were remote.

But still possible. And like the astronauts climbing into the Apollo 1 spacecraft or the folks planning how to evacuate the Twin Towers, we all suffered from a failure of imagination about what could happen. I can’t think of a single gun owner or cop I’ve known who thought of an immigrant loner getting a gun licence after just landing here and with such a plan of attack in mind. It’s likely that our security services did not either.

But even so, I have never been so grateful as I was this past week to have stopped watching and listening to the NZ MSM fifteen years ago. What electricity towers health risks I have heard and largely not seen has been filtered through various NZ blogs, but even there the levels of hysteria, emotion and group think have been nearly off the scale. That aspect seemed like we were losing our minds.

I can therefore only barely imagine what it has been like for those of you still silly enough to be tuning to One News, 3News and Radio NZ ‘s National Programme. But of course where the local MSM goes, the foreign MSM has already led. It’s like a hivemind and it’s summarised pretty well by some smartass who put together the following contrasting headlines from popular US magazine / website Slate, one from 2016 and one from 2019:

In an instant the Right and the Left have somersaulted over eachother and exchanged knives. The terms used for the last twenty years by much of the Left electricity 101 powerpoint whenever a Jihadist terrorist attack occurred – Lone Wolf and Not Representative of the Whole – are now being dismissed by them as deflection and excuse-making. Forget any debate about which terrorist actions can accurately be described by these terms, the fight being less one of definitions and their application than about drowning opponents in the sheer quantity of repetition and volume.

Wreaking vengeance on the single perpetrator of the Christchurch Mosque Shootings will not be enough for those who refuse to see him as a lone-wolf terrorist, but s gashi rather as a symptom of New Zealand society’s deeper ills. The temptation, especially on the Cultural Left, will be to hold conservatives and conservatism individually and severally liable. Not, of course, for the deed, but for creating the ideological climate out of which the deed emerged. Those even further to the left (among whom we must now include an alarming number of Greens) will go even further. They will tell New Zealanders that all this horror is, really, their fault. That they must simply accept that, be it the United States, Canada, Australia or New Zealand, the sins of the colonial fathers will out. That Pakeha New Zealanders must gas house eggs, accordingly, surrender their “White Privilege”.

Even though he’s a child of the 60’s Counter-culture revolution, Chris is a still a member of the Old Left, determined to keep the idea of class warfare in focus as the cause of most of our societal ills, and with little time for the post-modern world of Intersectionality and Identity Politics carving the proletariat into ever finer slices of victimhood. As such he’s been belittled considerably in loftier corners of the NZ Left like Public Address, where he finds himself mocked, along with Paul Buchanan, as yet another Old White Reactionary Male. A few other such Lefties have found themselves banned from the likes of The Standard blog because the moderators insisted that criticism of Islam equaled Muslim Hate Speech.

Not that the Prime Minister’s worries are located exclusively on the right. Already, she is reported to be casting anxious glances to her left. The radical wing of the Green Party is in the process of staking out an aggressively uncompromising position on hate speech electricity and circuits class 6 ppt. This has earned them much respect on Twitter, but it is unclear how favourably the hard-line stance of Marama Davidson and Golriz Ghahraman is being be received by the broader electorate. Labour will be keen to avoid the perception that they are being led into the ideological long grass by its “woke” allies.

Chris’s usual parochial concerns are present as he worries about how the Far Right could grab this chance to get back in the game, but to give him credit he seems genuinely concerned about voices such as the two named. As he wrote those words he may have been unaware of the Chief Censor banning the shooter gsa 2016 calendar’s manifesto, even as an Imam in Los Angeles waves it around during his sermon.

In 1951 Syd Holland’s National government passed some of the most draconian laws against free speech outside of the Communist bloc, ironically to combat Communism in New Zealand. One story was that Walter Nash, then Labour Party leader, turned up to speak at a union meeting and was table d gaskets told, by a senior cop blocking his way, that he would be arrested. Nash showed a degree of spine in saying he was going to speak anyway, and moved into the hall to do so. The cop apparently had good judgement and Nash was not arrested. The story, which was one of the earliest political ones I got from my Dad, may be apocryphal but there’s no question that a number of Left-wingers had their jobs and livelihoods threatened by those laws and it’s regarded today by almost everyone as a black mark on NZ’s history of civil liberties.

If one were to predict between comity and authoritarianism in the coming years the odds would favor authoritarianism. Never has so much naked ambition disguised itself as virtue, and the more loudly political factions proclaim they’re out to save the world, the more ruthless they are likely to be. Liberty will come under assault from the banner of tolerance; fascism will advance in the guise of grievance.

The manifesto incites violence against a minority group and is therefore a no-brainer for the Chief Censor – he has 5 gases found in the environment to ban it or he’s not doing his job. NZ legislation is pretty clear that incitement to violence is not protected speech, so the decision was straightforward. It reflects long-standing NZ law and not any new development in state censorship. Government ministers would have had no involvement.

Macdoctor hasn’t incited violence against anyone (as far as I’m aware) and is guilty of nothing more than publishing currently-unpopular opinions. Apparently, that’s enough for NZ’s equivalents of the Stasi’s informeller Mitarbeiter (informal colleagues’ ie informants) to swing into action and also enough to get him stood down from his job. That is very different from what the OFLC’s done, and is very worrying in that it doesn’t reflect any official policy but is entirely crowd-sourced 1 unit electricity cost in andhra pradesh oppression. If the government is doing things we don’t like, we can make life difficult for it and campaign against its re-election, but there’s nothing we can do about about crowd-sourced oppression.

Why do I always get worried when the likes of Marama Davidson starts flinging instructions around about what we need to do: A lot of people wanted to separate what happened in Christchurch from politics, but if we have any hope of truly honouring those who passed we need to listen to our Muslim, Māori, Pacific and migrant communities, all saying this is not just about a violent shooter, but about everyday racism….These were the voices from the front line of everything we need to heal.

And I take issue with the assessment of Mengzhu Fu of MARX – yes, really (Migrants Against Racism and Xenophobia) -, We chose to centre the voices of people who have been most affected gas welder job description by white supremacist terrorism.. Er, no you didn’t. If you had it would have focused on those who lost their family and friends in the Christchurch attacks, not a grab-bag of malcontents, as evidenced by this presumptuous arrogance: Perhaps for the Pākehā who left ‘in protest’, this beautiful show of solidarity between tāngata whenua, Muslims and migrants of colour is what threatened you the most.

Yes, a lot of people will likely take stock as a result of March 15, and that is a good thing. And perhaps my initial reaction that there will be a different type of public and political discourse over issues such as Muslim immigration and race will evolve. But I doubt very much that electricity manipulation for all her zeal, a long-time self-promoter like Davidson will be facilitating new insights for anyone. Rather, she will continue to harden existing prejudices…on both sides of the political divide. So best to regard her as a sideshow I would suggest.