No world wars – is the world richer page 3 alternate history discussion electricity use in the us


Second, you’re confusing correlation and causation. Yes, technological advances happened during the wars — but those gas used in ww1 technological advances would likely have taken place during those years anyway. Radar, rockets, computation and the nuclear bomb were all under development before WW2, and were simply rushed into production. Sure, the scientists got some more funding, and maybe they worked longer hours, but even that funding took them away from other projects.

Finally, WW1 and WW2 had a vast negative effect on technology and science, by killing gas z factor off hundreds of millions of potential scientists. I’m a complex analyst, and one of the great minds of my field, Teichmuller, died on the battlefield of WW2, at the young age of 30. In WW1 the equally promising Frechet was killed gas bloating pain, and the great Julia was terribly wounded. Grothendieck, probably the single greatest mathematician of the 20th century, very nearly died in a DP camp. Plus you have the fact that universities and laboratories were destroyed, records lost, research disrupted — and not just during the wars themselves, but for many years afterwards.

The American civil rights movement not so much driven by sympathy for the Jews, minorities or the Nuremburg trials. It was driven by suburban sprawl and overall prosperity that electricity generation efficiency made much of American progress off limits to blacks and minorities at the end of the fifties. The Jim Crow segregation that was tolerated in 1950 became intolerable a decade later. Television made the disparity painfully obvious on a daily gas stoichiometry formula basis, as sponsors filled the (white-only) TV studios with state-of the art appliances and furniture. The civil rights movement will follow whatever factors delay or accelerate automobile-based living.

This is a big variable. Without WWI, do we have a Russian revolution as we know it? If not, does socialism remain a pie-in-the sky philosophy? If so, as a response to the American Depression, do communities gas knife selectively adopt some some partial socialism, without religious issues or atheism? After all, the American Midwest had many communial societies, almost all faith-based, in the 19th century, some lasting mere weeks and others lasting decades (the Amana Colonies in Iowa lasted until the 1930’s).

Click to expand…Many European countries had Social Democratic groups and parties before 1914, and they had been gaining ground for many years. I think a world without world wars would still have strong left wing gas vs electric water heater parties in the 20s and 30s, and their position would be entrenched as a commonplace part of the political milieu. And if these Social Democratic parties manage in many places to push through legislation that helps the workers and the less well off, for their voting base it seems that the democratic system a gas has no volume is working. Thus the moderate left wing parties will continually trump the far left in most countries.

In many European countries the depredations and chaos of WWI, especially the latter part, radicalized left wing movements and the Russian example (and sometimes actual Bolsheviks goading them) pushed them to revolutionary acts. Without the war(s), such conditions that seem to allow a violent power grab k electric company don’t exist and there is less radicalization. If no country in Europe or America goes fully *Communist gaston y astrid lima through a revolution like Russia did, the left also would not be as vilified and feared as it was IOTL. The bourgeois parties would be more inclined to work with the left, and in time would become used to the fact that they have to contend with a strong (if mostly moderate) groups on the left.