Norway maple makes “most hated plants” list electricity facts for 4th graders


Norway maple is an invasive plant you should not put in landscapes, and for which there are several good alternatives. This maple tolerates heavy shade, so establishes well in woodlands where birds drop their seeds. There, with their own heavy canopies, they shade out native wildflowers. Their shallow roots compete in forests with other less vigorous native vegetation.

Norway maple is the most prevalent maple in Europe, occurring from Norway to Iran. Seedlings first were introduced to this country by the famous nurseryman and explorer John Bartram in 1756. Similar to many such plants, its invasive tendencies didn’t become noticed until much later. In the early 1900’s the first electricity symbols ks2 worksheet records note it “occasionally escaped.” Today, it is on invasive plant lists in many states, and banned electricity symbols from further planting in others.

The Norway maple (Acer platanoides) is widely planted in landscapes and along streets. Grown for its vigor, adaptability, and cool shade it provides, it has drawbacks even in landscapes. The shallow, dense roots compete with lawns and many less vigorous landscape plants. The seedlings can be a problem in home landscapes just as they are in natural ones.

Both the red and sugar maples are alternative choices to the Norway maple. Both reach a similar height of 50 to 70 feet as the Norway maple. They are native, hardy, and have attractive seasonal foliage. The red maple (Acer rubrum) has red spring color when in bloom, and yellow to red leaves in fall. Most know the attractive leaves of Vermont’s state tree, the sugar maple (Acer saccharum). The red maple tolerates wet soils better than the sugar maple, but is not as drought tolerant. There are many other alternative trees. go to

If you choose to plant like this, you are encouraging a sterile, empty landscape, since it provides no food for insects, spiders, or birds. If you plant slow-growing native oaks, the opposite will be true. Even if you plant fast growing, aggressive r gasquet tennis native black cherry trees, the opposite will be true. You will encourage a diversity of life forms around you, which is what residential landowners should be striving to do.

I agree this article isn’t written maybe in the most convincing fashion, but the conclusion is correct. No one should be planting new Norway maples, and people who own property with existing Norway maples should develop a plan to remove them, and replace them with native tree species, which will also drop leaves, seeds, nut (garbage) but which will encourage small and diverse lifeforms beyond your imagination. It really does happen national gas average 2012.

If you plant some milkweed, you will get Monarch butterflies. If you don’t rake your leaves, you will get fireflies. These are things we can see. There are also myriad lifeforms that we CAN’T see that we are encouraging by planting native gasset y ortega filosofia plants, but when you see more and different kinds of birds in your yards, and holes in the some of the leaves, you will know that what you have planted made a positive difference.

While I agree with some other comments regarding issues in the article (like the use of the word trash?…and the photos not clearly showing anything relevant), Norway Maples are invasive in much of the US. It’s not just the author’s opinion. In some states, it is already ILLEGAL to sell them due to the way they spread and harm diversity. The comments basically saying but I like them! are equally ridiculous to the problems in the article itself. Do a little research, folks. The tree can be OK as a stand alone tree in an urban yard, but they are terrible if allowed to spread into woodlots or compete with any other young trees. At my parent’s house, Norway Maples were starting to take over their woods. After I removed them all, sunlight once again was allowed down through the canopy and more native (and beautiful grade 9 electricity test) plants began to thrive again. I left the Norways alone that were shade trees by the house since I didn’t want to drastically alter their landscape all at once, but just know that if you plant Norways and have a little bit of woods around, you’ll want to protect your woods by removing any young Norways that infiltrate. They are invasive, officially, scientifically, that’s what they are. Give Sugar Maples a chance, or select a non-maple. Please always keep learning. I will try to also.

I have six Norway Maples on my property, and I wish I had more. Firstly, they grow gas monkey live fast. Secondly, they provide great shade. Thirdly, their green leaves are among the first to open, and remain leafy green long after most other trees have lost their leaves. And forth, they block out really ugly views (abd neighbours’ peering eyes). I have had no problem growing hostas underneath them, and even if I couldn’t grow anything under, so what. They are a beautiful, tall tree that adds beautiful greenery for three seasons. Yes, seedlings show up a lot, and yes, there are a lot of leaves to rake up in the fall, but to be honest, I rarely even rake them. They break down organically, and create more topsoil each and every year. I have one right in front of my bedroom window, and I love it. It gives me privacy, and with the shallow roots, I don’t have to worry about the roots causing damage to my foundation. I just trim a few branches every couple of years. Have had it there over twenty years, and I love, love, love it, just as I love those in my back yard. By the way, my rating is for the static electricity bill nye full episode tree, not this article.