Ny times pushes nukes while claiming renewables fail to fight climate change

The New York Times published an astonishing article last week that blames green power for difficulties countries are facing to mitigate climate change.

The article by Eduardo Porter, How Renewable Energy is Blowing Climate Change Efforts Off Course, serves as a flagship for an on-going attack on the growth of renewables. Electricity bill nye worksheet It is so convoluted and inaccurate that it requires a detailed response.

The New York Times article “suffers from the inaccurate assumption that existing expensive nuclear that is shut down will be replaced by natural gas. Gas density of air This is impossible in California, for example, since gas is currently 60 percent of electricity supply but state law requires non-large-hydro clean renewables to be 50 percent by 2030. Gas laws This means that, with the shuttering of Diablo Canyon nuclear facility be 2025, gas can by no greater than 35-44 percent of California supply since clean renewables will be at least 50 percent (and probably much more) and large hydro will be 6-15 percent. Electricity kwh As such, gas must go down no matter what. Wd gaster cosplay tutorial In fact, 100 percent of all new electric power in Europe in 2015 was clean, renewable energy with no new net gas, and 70 percent of all new energy in the U.S. Electricity wiki was clean and renewable, so the fact is nuclear is not being replaced by gas but by clean, renewable energy.

“Further, the article fails to consider the fact that the cost of keeping nuclear open is often much greater than the cost of replacing the nuclear with wind or solar. Gas cap code For example, three upstate New York nuclear plants require $7.6 billion in subsidies from the state to stay open 12 years. Gas utility To stay open after that, they will need an additional $805 million/year at a minimum, or at least $17.7 billion from 2028-2050, or a total of $25.3 billion from 2016 to 2050. Electricity bill cost per month If, on the other hand, those three plants were replaced with wind today, the total cost between now and 2050 would be $11.9 billion. Gaston y astrid lima Thus, keeping the nuclear plants open 12 years costs an additional $7.6 billion; keeping it open 34 years costs and additional $25.3 billion, in both cases with zero additional climate benefit, in comparison with shuttering the three plants today and replacing them with onshore wind.”

“The notion that non-renewable power sources are necessary is questionable at best. Gas nozzle keeps stopping Some scientists believe that, over the next few decades, renewables could provide all our power. Gas vs electric oven cost One is Stanford Prof. When was gas 99 cents in california Mark Jacobson. Gas leak los angeles california He has done modeling to show the U.S. Gas stoichiometry worksheet answers could be entirely powered by renewables by 2050.

“Porter is wrong to claim that nuclear produces ‘zero-carbon electricity.’ If we look at the full nuclear cycle, including production of uranium fuel, we find it involves considerable carbon emissions. Electricity magnetism and light Jacobson and his co-author, Mark A. E payment electricity bill up Delucchi, have written, ‘Nuclear power results in up to 25 times more carbon emissions than wind energy, when reactor construction and uranium refining and transport are considered.’

“Porter says if American nuclear plants were replaced with gas-fired generators it would lead to 200 million tons of additional CO2 emissions annually. Gasbuddy near me But it’s wrong to suggest that nuclear could only be replaced by natural gas. Gas efficient suv 2013 A full suite of renewables—along with energy storageand conservation programs—could meet demand, certainly in the not very distant future.

“Porter suggests that nuclear power can ‘stay on all the time.’ But of course, nuclear plants, like all generators, are sometimes out of service for maintenance. Electricity history facts This downtime can be considerable. Gastroparesis For example, it is expected that from 2017 to 2021, Ontario’s Pickering nuclear station will require back-up almost 30 percent of the time.”

Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at State University of New York/College at Old Westbury, called the Times piece “outrageous.” He told me:

“The Times piece continues the paper’s long record of minimizing and downplaying—not recognizing and indeed often denying—the deadly impacts of nuclear power. Electricity demand It’s been a shameful journalistic dysfunction. Gas vs electric water heater cost per year As Alden Whitman, a Times reporter for 25 years, told me, ‘there certainly was never any effort made to do’ in-depth or investigative reporting on nuclear power. Tgask ‘I think there stupidity involved,’ he said, and further, ‘The Times regards itself as part of the establishment.” Or as Anna Mayo of The Village Voice related: ‘I built a full-time career on covering nuclear horror stories that the New York Times neglected.’”

1. T gas terengganu Though viewed as the “journal of record,” the Times has been consistently pro-nuclear. Electricity 220v Its slanted coverage has served as an industry bulwark for decades. Gas quality by brand A long-time atomic beat reporter, Matt Wald, went straight from the Times to a job with the Nuclear Energy Institute, the primary public relations front for the reactor industry. Electricity questions for class 10 The Times has a long history as a cheerleader for nuclear power dating back to the atomic bomb era, when it consistently denied health problems from radioactive fallout. Electricity generation efficiency It also denied health problems resulting from radiation releases at Three Mile Island, and much more. O gascon Now it has taken a major role in defending the nuclear industry from the renewable energy revolution that is driving it to bankruptcy while bringing a tsunami of reactor shut downs. Gas and supply acworth ga It’s these shut downs that now seem to worry the paper.

2. Electricity usage in the us The primary technological transition in the world of electric power today is from fossil and nuclear fuels (King CONG: Coal, Oil, Nukes, Gas) to a Solartopian system based on green power. Electricity and magnetism worksheets 5th grade But there’s a deeper shift going on: from centralized, grid-based corporate control to decentralized citizen-based community control. C gastritis When nuclear power and its apologists defend continued operations at dangerously deteriorated reactors, they are more broadly defending the power and profits of huge corporations that are completely invested in a centralized grid. Gas south When they argue that renewables “can’t do the job,” they’re in fact working to prolong the lives of the large generators that are the “base load” basis of a corporate grid-based supply system.

3. Electric zap sound effect free But that grid is now obsolete. Gas turbine What strikes the ultimate terror in utility boardrooms is the revolutionary reality of a decentralized power supply, free of large generators, comprised instead of millions of small photovoltaic (PV) panels owned by individuals. Hp gas kushaiguda phone number Industry sources have widely confirmed that this decentralized, post-grid model means the end of big utilities. Electricity song lyrics Thus when they fight against PV and for nuclear power, they are fighting not for the life of the planet, but for the survival of their own corporate profits.

4. Electricity was invented Some utilities do support some renewables, but primarily in the form of large centralized grid-based solar and wind turbine farms. Electricity nightcore Pacific Gas & Electric said it will replace the power from the Diablo Canyon nuke plant with solar energy. Electricity kwh cost uk But PG&E is simultaneously fighting rooftop solar, which will allow individual homeowners to disconnect from the grid. Electricity transmission vs distribution Germany’s transition from fossil-nukes to renewables has also been marked by conflict between large grid-based wind farms versus small community-based renewables.

5. Orlando electricity providers PG&E and other major utilities are fighting against net metering and other programs that promote small-scale renewables. Electricity jewels The Koch Brothers’ American Legislature Exchange Council ( ALEC) has spread a wide range of taxes and disincentives passed by the states to make it ever-harder to go solar. Electricity vs gas heating costs All this is being done to preserve the grid-based monopolies that own large fossil/nuclear facilities.

6. Gas city indiana car show The idea that nuclear power might fight climate change, and that environmentalists might support it, is a recent concoction, a disgraceful, desperate load of utility hype meant to defend the status quo. Electricity billy elliot karaoke Fukushima, unsolved waste problems and the plummeting price of renewables have solidified the environmental community’s opposition to nuke power. Gas hydrates wiki These reactors are dirty and dangerous. Gas meter car They are not carbon-free and do emit huge quantities of heated water and steam into the ecosphere. K electric company duplicate bill The utility industry can’t get private liability insurance for them, and relies on the 1957 Price-Anderson Act to protect them from liability in a major catastrophe. Gas jeans usa The industry continually complains about subsidies to renewable energy but never mentions this government protection program without which all reactors would close.

7. Harry mileaf electricity 1 7 pdf Not just nuke power but the entire centralized fossil/nuke-based grid system is now being undermined by the massive drops in the price of renewable energy, and massive rises in its efficiency and reliability. E sampark electricity bill payment The critical missing link is battery technology. Electricity grid uk Because the sun and wind are intermittent, there needs to be energy storage to smooth out supply. Gas stoichiometry calculator Elon Musk‘s billion-dollar Tesla Gigafactory in Nevada and many other industrial ventures indicate major battery breakthroughs in storage is here today.

8. Electricity invented in homes Porter’s NY Times piece correctly says that the massive amounts of cheap, clean renewables flooding the grid in Europe and parts of the U.S. Electricity production in the us are driving nuclear power plants into bankruptcy. Electricity news philippines At least a dozen reactor shut downs have been announced in the U.S. Hp gas online registration since 2012 and many more are on their way. Gas and water llc In Japan 52 of the 54 reactors online before the Fukushima disaster are now closed. Electricity quiz for grade 5 And, Germany has pledged to shut all its reactors by 2022.

But Porter attacks this by complaining that those nukes were supplying base load power that must be otherwise—according to him—shored up with fossil burners. Hp electricity bill payment online Here’s his key line:

“Renewable sources are producing temporary power gluts from Australia to California, driving out other energy sources that are still necessary to maintain a stable supply of power.”

But as all serious environmentalists understand, the choice has never been between nukes versus fossil fuels. Electricity generation in usa It’s between centralized fossil/nukes versus decentralized renewables.

Porter’s article never mentions the word “battery” or the term “rooftop solar.” But these are the two key parts in the green transition already very much in progress.

So here is what the Times obviously can’t bring itself to say: “Cheap solar panels on rooftops are now making the grid obsolete.” The key bridging element of battery back-up capability is on its way. Electricity word search j farkas answers Meanwhile there is absolutely no need for nuclear power plants, which at any rate have long since become far too expensive to operate.

Spending billions to prop up dying nuke reactors for “base load” generation is pure corporate theft at the public expense, both in straight financial terms and in the risk of running badly deteriorated reactors deep into the future until they inevitably melt down or blow up.

Those billions instead should go to accelerating battery production and distribution, and making it easier, rather than harder, to gain energy independence using the wind and the sun.

All this has serious real-world impacts. Gas efficient cars 2012 In Ohio, for example, a well-organized shift to wind and solar was derailed by the Koch-run legislature. Youtube gas station karaoke Some $2 billion in wind-power investments and a $500 million solar farm were derailed. Gasco abu dhabi careers There are also serious legal barriers now in place to stop homeowners from putting solar shingles and panels on their rooftops.

Meanwhile, FirstEnergy strong-armed the Ohio Public Utilities Commission into approving a huge bailout to keep the seriously deteriorated Davis-Besse nuke operating, even though it cannot compete and is losing huge sums of money. Electricity voltage in canada Federal regulators have since put that bailout on hold.

Arizona and other Koch-owned legislatures have moved to tax solar panels, ban solar shingles and make it illegal to leave the grid without still paying tribute to the utilities who own it. Gas 78 facebook Indeed, throughout the U.S. Gas house and much of the western world, corporate-owned governments are doing their best to slow the ability of people to use renewables to rid themselves of the corporate grid.

For an environmental movement serious about saving the Earth from climate change, this is a temporary barrier. Power per kwh The Times and its pro-nuke allies in the corporate media will continue to twist reality. V gashi halil bytyqi But the Solartopian revolution is proceeding ahead of schedule and under budget. Gas stoichiometry lab A renewable, decentralized energy system is very much in sight.

The only question is how long corporate nonsense like this latest NY Times screed can delay this vital transition. Gas key staking Our planet is burning up from fossil fuels and being irradiated by decrepit money-losing reactors that blow up. Gas definition physics Blaming renewable energy for all that is like blaming the peace movement for causing wars.

The centralized King CONG grid and its obsolete owners are at the core of the problem. Gas monkey monster truck hellcat So are the corporate media outlets like the New York Times that try to hide that obvious reality.