Obim transferred to dhs management under long-stalled cyber legislation signed into law biometricupdate electricity deregulation in california


DHS said, “CISA leads the national effort to defend critical infrastructure against the threats of today, while working with partners across all levels of government and in the private sector to secure against the evolving risks of tomorrow. gas nozzle prank The name CISA brings recognition to the work being done, improving its ability to engage with partners and stakeholders, and recruit top cybersecurity talent.”

CISA further “coordinates security and resilience efforts using trusted partnerships across the private and public sectors, and delivers training, technical assistance, and assessments to federal stakeholders as well as to infrastructure owners and operators nationwide,” and, “provides consolidated all-hazards risk analysis for US critical infrastructure through the National Risk Management Center.

“This legislation transforms NPPD into a new operational agency within the Department of Homeland Security and prioritizes our mission as the Federal leaders for cyber and physical infrastructure security,” said Christopher Krebs, Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. “The CISA Act elevates the cybersecurity mission within DHS and streamlines our operations to better secure the nation’s critical infrastructure and cyber platforms. wikipedia electricity consumption CISA continues NPPD’s mission of leading the national effort to improve critical infrastructure security, coordinating the protection of the federal government’s networks and physical infrastructure, and helping entities in the public and private sectors manage risk.”

CISA must also “develop, in coordination with the Sector-Specific Agencies with available expertise, a comprehensive national plan for securing the key resources and critical infrastructure of the United States, including power production, generation, and distribution systems, information technology and telecommunications systems (including satellites), electronic financial and property record storage and transmission systems, emergency communications systems, and the physical and technological assets that support those systems.”

In addition, the new law requires that, “To establish and utilize, in conjunction with the Chief Information Officer [CIO] of the Department, a secure communications and information technology infrastructure, including data-mining [of PII and personal biometric data] and other advanced analytical tools, in order to access, receive, and analyze data and information in furtherance of the responsibilities under this section, and to disseminate information acquired and analyzed by the department, as appropriate.”

• Developing, coordinating, and implementing a comprehensive strategic plans for the activities of the agency; risk assessments by and for the agency; carry out emergency communications responsibilities, in accordance with title XVIII; carry out cybersecurity, infrastructure security, and emergency communications stakeholder outreach and engagement and coordinate that outreach and engagement with critical infrastructure Sector-Specific Agencies, as appropriate; and, carry out such other duties and powers prescribed by law or delegated by the DHS Secretary.

The new law mandates that the responsibilities of the DHS Secretary relating to cybersecurity and infrastructure security also includes accessing, receiving, and analyzing law enforcement information, intelligence information, and other information from federal government agencies, state, local, tribal, and territorial government agencies, including law enforcement agencies, and private sector entities, and to integrate that information, in support of the mission responsibilities of the department, in order to:

Comprehensive assessments of the vulnerabilities of the key resources and critical infrastructure of the US, including the performance of risk assessments to determine the risks posed by particular types of terrorist attacks in the US — including an assessment of the probability of success of those attacks and the feasibility and potential efficacy of various countermeasures to those attacks – the DHS secretary, at his/her discretion, “may be carried out in coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies,” and, “to integrate relevant information, analysis, and vulnerability assessments, regardless of whether the information, analysis, or assessments are provided or produced by DHS, in order to make recommendations, including prioritization, for protective and support measures by the department, other federal government agencies, state, local, tribal, and territorial government agencies and authorities, the private sector, and other entities regarding terrorist and other threats to homeland security.”

Both senior DHS and Intelligence Community [IC] officials told Biometric Update on background that, as one put it, “pretty much all such assessments – some in real-time if there’s actionable intelligence – will necessarily require biometrically-enabled personnel, like analysts, to have to access any number of data systems containing biometric PII if they’re going to be able to connect the dots, especially in cooperation with other intelligence agencies, and, I’m assuming, with cooperation from the Four Eyes,” a reference to Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, which, along with the US, comprise an alliance (officially known as “Five Eyes” (FVEY)) bound by the multilateral UKUSA Agreement for joint cooperation in signals intelligence, military intelligence, and human intelligence.

Indeed. hp gas online booking hyderabad The requires the DHS secretary to “ensure, pursuant to section 202, the timely and efficient access by the department to all information necessary to discharge the responsibilities under this title, including obtaining that information from other federal government agencies,” as well as disseminating, “as appropriate, information analyzed by the department within the department to other federal government agencies with responsibilities relating to homeland security, and to state, local, tribal, and territorial government agencies and private sector entities … in order to assist in the deterrence, prevention, or preemption of, or response to, terrorist attacks against the United States.”

Of course, the law requires that “any material received pursuant to this Act is protected from unauthorized disclosure and handled and used only for the performance of official duties,” which, emphasized one of the officials who spoke to Biometric Update, “are obviously going to have to have strict biometric security access controls of one kind or another in place” – as pursuant to various laws, National Institute of Standards and Technology guidelines and directives, DHS’s Privacy Office’s recent Data Mining Report to Congress, DHS’s Biometrics Strategic Framework 2015-2025, etc.

And then there’s the additional scrutiny that Congress has put on DHS’s use of biometrics, as Biometric Update has reported. k electric company duplicate bill While the recently passed T ransportation Security Administration [TSA] Modernization Act, for example, empowers TSA to expand field operations testing of advanced screening technologies, especially biometrics, it also puts somewhat of new reigns on biometric usage.

Pursuant to the new law, under “Biometric Expansion,” the TSA Administrator and the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) “shall consult with each other on the deployment of biometric technologies,” and under a new “Rule of Construction,” the CBP Commissioner “shall” not “facilitate or expand the deployment of biometric technologies, or otherwise collect, use, or retain biometrics, not authorized by any provision of or amendment made by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, or the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, without the DHS secretary first submitting “to the appropriate committees of Congress, and to any member of Congress upon the request of that member, a report that includes specific assessments from the [TSA] Administrator and the Commissioner of [CBP] …”

Furthermore, while Congress recently passed legislation imposing potentially expensive – but unfunded –reporting and compliance requirements on CBP and TSA programs to expand their use of biometrics, as reported by Biometric Update, DHS’s Privacy Office’s 2018 annual report to Congress said preventing terrorism through biometrics is among the numerous biometric priorities it will put under scrutiny in the new federal fiscal year, which began in October. electricity generation by source by country DHS’s Privacy Office indicated it will be keeping a close eye on the use of biometrics across the entire DHS enterprise with regard to keeping biometric related privacy issues in check pursuant to federal laws. gas bloating pregnancy The Privacy Office said it “is working closely with CBP to ensure that facial recognition technology used to verify a traveler’s identity is implemented in a privacy-protective manner, as required by federal mandates.”

The CISA Act mandates DHS establish “a secure communications and information technology infrastructure, including data-mining and other advanced analytical tools, in order to access, receive, and analyze data and information in furtherance of the responsibilities under [the Act], and to disseminate information acquired and analyzed by the department, as appropriate,” including vetting of all “consumers of information provided by” DHS to expedite “identification and sharing of information revealed in their ordinary duties and the optimal utilization of information received from” DHS.

This could prove a daunting task, considering the embarrassing number of Government Accountability Office (GAO) audits of FPS pointing out serious physical and internal access controls. Indeed, FPS has come under fire – including by its own personnel and contract security personnel at many facilities over the lack of biometrics or malfunctioning biometrics; problematic personnel CACs and other PII access cards; malfunctioning readers and a wide variety of other external and internal access security problems, an FPS contractor divulged to Biometric Update.