Onfaith discussion let’s stop singing these 10 worship songs grade 9 electricity quiz


I quite like what Chuck Colson wrote: “We’d been led through endless repetitions of a meaningless ditty called ‘Draw Me Close to You,’ which has zero theological content and could just as easily be sung in any nightclub. When I thought it was finally and mercifully over, the music leader beamed. ‘Let’s sing that again, shall we?’ he asked. ‘No!’ I shouted, loudly enough to send heads all around me spinning while my wife, Patty, cringed.”

I understand songwriter Phil Wickman’s sentiments when he says, “We wanted to talk about the power of the name of God . . . . electricity outage houston tx Now we see who Yahweh is in the person of Jesus.” But I tend to fall more in line with Carol Bechtel, Western Theological Seminary professor, who says, “[T]he most obvious reason to avoid using the proper and more personal name of God in the Old Testament is simply respect for God.”

First, this song essentially just repeats a short chorus over and over — meaning there’s little substance to work with in the first place. On top of that, what it does speak to is such a small fraction of the fullness of the gospel story. It leaves out the resurrection, Jesus’ teachings, the coming of the Kingdom — new heavens and new earth — just to name a few things.

This song is rather beautiful, until its last line — which is utterly man-centered. j gastroenterol hepatol impact factor Pastor John Piper took that line to task: “He thought of his glory above all on the cross . . . . God always thinks of himself above us. He is always more important than us.” While the Bible does say Jesus had his people in mind — i.e. Galatians 2:20, “And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me” — we were certainly not “above all.”

This one is demonstrative of the many Christian worship songs that overpromise on what we undoubtedly under-deliver — essentially, a willingness to trust God with abandon. gas outage Addie Zierman writes about questioning hyperbole in worship songs. I side with her. Often I’ve caught myself singing along when suddenly I’m struck by a question: “Wait, would I?” Would I really go to the ends of the earth? And then I feel like I’m making false, outlandish statements to the God who knows my heart — my prideful, arrogant, selfish human heart.

It’s not necessarily that there’s anything wrong with this song, but it provides so little in the way of theological depth. 5 gas laws It’s not that every song should spell out the gospel in its entirety, but there’s something irksome about songs that seem intended to make us feel, to simply incite that euphoric worship experience, that spiritual high. It almost seems cheap . . . or fake.

It’s unfair (not to mention incorrect) to sing a song that suggests life as a Christian is easy, without problems, an all around good time. electricity experiments for 4th graders Yes, I understand that in the ultimate sense these things are true — that Jesus frees his people from death to a relationship with God. But as the Apostle Paul writes to the church in Corinth, “For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities.”

This one lyric is so awkward that worship teams have been known to change the line to “like an unforeseen kiss.” Definitely less uncomfortable. I don’t have any real qualms with the rest of the song, but . . . sloppy wet kiss? Sounds like something dogs or teenagers with raging hormones do. Something my worship could do without. That’s not to say the whole song should go — just that one line.