Pay discrimination in atc – pprune forums electricity physics formulas

##########

More generally, whilst this situation may seem unfair, are you comparing like with like? What is the contract offered to local employees – does it give confidence of a long-term job, working directly for a State government can sometimes mean ‘a job for life’? How long can a sub-contractor be assured of a job? Does the directly employed contract include a pension, sub-contractor jobs gas and supply shreveport usually do not? Housing costs for non-locals on indeterminate contracts are usually significantly higher than the opportunities available to nationals for a variety of reasons. Education costs for non-nationals are likely to be higher also, if for no other reason than sub-contractors are often going to prefer sending children to an international school. Similar arguments may apply to health insurance costs. And, of course, if the sub-contractor has a family, he or she will want to maintain a family life, either by having their family with them or having acceptable arrangements for going home to spend time with them – this is likely to be less of an issue for a local, directly employed person. If the government wants or feels the need to attract personnel from other countries, it will have to offer a package that is sufficiently attractive to tempt suitably skilled and competent people to apply and join the team. I’m not saying this is right or wrong, simply stating a few facts from my perspective having been in similar situations myself (both as a local and an incomer).

Having said all that, all other things being equal, I do believe that people eon gas card top up doing the same job should receive the same remuneration (for the work that they do). The problem sometimes is that other things are not equal – such as the going rate for a particular job in different countries – and in order to attract non-nationals it may be necessary to pay a supplement that provides an equivalent level of income to that available in other countries. But ATC is increasingly becoming a global business – if anyone has the skills and competences to do the job, there are often opportunities available across the border.

Okay LookingForAJob your answer is good in a generic point of view, but let me give you some insights. First of all, I checked if Bahrain has laws against pay discrimination like most western countries in Europe and North America, and unfortunately it does not, so from a legal standpoint what they do is permitted, nevertheless, that does not necessarily make it neither ethical nor moral.

Telling me that foreigners must get paid more due to the fact that they require accommodation and tickets to go back home and family members coming over to live with them and all that, its is hypothetically sound until you see the numbers and statistics in pay difference. The median salary for a Bahraini ATCO in US dollars is $5000 a month (in Bahrain salary is calculated per month). Meanwhile, the median salary of a foreign ATCO in Bahrain is $15000 a month. That is a difference of $10000 a month! Now if someone thinks that accommodation and other expense costs $10000 a MONTH in Bahrain, they are totally absurd. Most expenses in Bahrain are equal for both foreigners and locals. Hell Bahrain as a country did not even have any taxes not until 2019. Before that it was a tax free country, and still to date there is no income tax, and it is not a very expensive country to live in, especially for someone that gets paid USD 180,000 a year!

You asked a question – I gave an answer. I did not say electricity voltage in canada it was fair, indeed, I specifically made the point that I believe people doing the same job should be paid the same for doing the job. Nor did I say that foreigners must be paid more than local employees, rather that it may be necessary to pay more to attract a foreigner to a particular job if it is decided that foreigners are required.

Another point that I would make, particularly as you mention USD, is that some people will have to pay tax to their home State on their income wherever it may be earned so, some of the people that you are working next to may be paying significant more tax (pro-rata) than you – if you are working with any US citizens you might like to have a chat with them about this.

I’m still not saying any of this is fair, but life was not designed to be fair. I happen to be happily unmarried, but in many jobs I have received less money at the end of the month than my married colleagues doing exactly the same job because there is some allowance that is included in the pay arrangements for some reason. Likewise, I have seen contracts where, because I was unmarried I would get one trip home each year whereas someone with a family would get three trips home each year. One pension scheme that I have been electricity facts for 4th graders in would pay a substantial pension to my spouse (if I had one) if I died – being unmarried, that benefit went back into the fund so that all the married people could get their payments. Is any of this fair – well, I don’t think it’s particularly equitable…but in most cases there’s not a lot I can do about it. Where I could do something, I did.

There are british gas jokes some things you can control and others you cannot – but we each have a degree of control over our destiny. We are fortunate to work in a global business – if you have something you think is of value to offer and it’s not currently recognised, you can pack your bags and go and sell yourself somewhere else. On the other hand, if you have, for example, a family in Bahrain that you do not want to uproot, or you like having some of the things that the State provides for you, you may choose to stay where you are. Whatever your circumstances, you have choices. And, as you say, it’s not rocket science.

Marriage allowances are very normal in many jobs, even among us the local controller, married employees get paid an allowance for being married, while others that are not married, like myself, do not have that. But that is not, by any means, comparable to the situation that I am talking about. I am aware that a lot of countries impose income tax on their citizens income wherever in the world they work at, and still I do not see the relevance between that and the astronomical difference in pay between local and foreign ATCOs. Things like that would make the difference between pays reasonably more in one type than the other, but when the gas exchange in the lungs difference is unreasonably enormous in the same working environment and same job, that elevates the reason for that difference to a whole new level. If I, for example, lets say go to work in a job in the UK and do the same job in a workplace with the locals in there, I would never, ever, get paid more than them, and we all not that. I don’t have the problem that, because the way I see it I do not earn the right to be paid more and have more worth than the people that are actually from there. Also, organizations in there could value their local work force and invest in human factor pretty well, and I really admire that.