Purdue calls massachusetts opioid suit ‘oversimplified scapegoating,’ seeks dismissal 9gag nsfw


The motion to dismiss, Purdue’s second, was filed Friday in response to an expanded complaint Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey filed against the OxyContin manufacturer in December. That 277-complaint generated headlines nationwide for claims that the Sackler family pulled billions of dollars from the company and “made choices that caused much of the opioid epidemic.”

Purdue said Massachusetts electricity 3 phase vs single phase assembled its complaint by selectively quoting from millions of pages of documents the state obtained electricity cost per month in discovery, while ignoring fundamental legal flaws with its case. The state is suing Purdue for violating its consumer laws by making allegedly false statements about the risk of addiction from OxyContin and for creating a public nuisance with its products.

Purdue, which is reportedly investigating bankruptcy protection from the claims against it, faces long odds against having the Massachusetts case dismissed in state court. U.S. District Judge Dan Aaron Polster in Ohio, who is overseeing federal multidistrict litigation against the opioid industry, has rejected similar arguments, as have judges in other states.

A Connecticut judge electricity videos for 4th grade threw out lawsuits by four cities against opioid makers in January, calling them an attempt at “junk justice,” and a Delaware court last year dismissed public nuisance claims against the industry. But that court, while dismissing claims against pharmacies, recently allowed Delaware to continue suing drug distributors and manufacturers over allegedly improper marketing practices.

Massachusetts accuses Purdue of misleading prescribing physicians by distributing marketing materials that suggest year 6 electricity worksheets OxyContin is less susceptible to abuse and addiction. The long-acting pills were designed to be more difficult to crush and heat into an injectable liquid, but Massachusetts cites internal documents showing Purdue executives and board members were long aware that the anti-abuse properties were being circumvented.

The complaint primarily accuses Purdue of improperly marketing its drugs for long-term therapy at high doses, an indication the FDA repeatedly has approved. In 2013 gas kinetic energy, the agency rejected a citizen petition to limit the duration and daily dose of prescription opioids and also declined to require warnings about the risks of longer-term therapy and higher doses.

Purdue settled similar claims of marketing abuses with 27 states including Massachusetts in 2007, the company says, and Massachusetts never accused it of violating the gas efficient cars under 10000 terms of its consent agreement during a three-year monitoring period after the settlement. Purdue also operated under a five-year monitoring agreement with the federal government, which ended in 2013 without any further accusations of wrongdoing.

The company also attacks what it calls a broken chain of causation between the factory floor and the opioid addiction crisis. The Massachusetts Public Health Department found that 89% of opioid overdose victims tested 3 gases in the atmosphere positive for fentanyl and 34% had heroin in their system, meaning prescription opioids can’t be blamed for the bulk of opioid deaths, the company says. The Public a shell gas station near me Health Department also has said no single substance or practice is solely responsible for the opioid crisis, calling it “a complex issue with a number of contributing factors.”

While Purdue has little likelihood of convincing a state court judge to dismiss claims based on broadly worded consumer protection statutes, it might have better luck with the public nuisance claims, which electricity and magnetism worksheets 4th grade traditionally were restricted to cases in which the public was deprived of a general right – such as the right to travel freely on a public road. Judges in Delaware and Connecticut have dismissed similar public nuisance claims, with the Delaware judge noting last year “a clear national trend to limit public nuisance to land use.” RECOMMENDED BY FORBES