Rash, disease, syracuse and more – voysearch electricity austin

Yes it can yield false positives. But I think those have been greatly exaggerated , at the expense of people who’s diagnoses our list . But yes , there are many efforts going on right now to develop new tests . The National Institutes of Health , spends millions of dollars to find research I knew tests every year . It’s not enough I would ahead , but it makes a statement that the NIH knows there’s a problem with these tests and you know I expect probably in the next couple of years that a new test will come along , but we have been working with the same test since 1994 and we have known it is problematic for many years and it’s really unconscionable that we are still using this test . It’s time to to retire it and move on to something else . But what often happens is that doctors who specialize in treating Lyme disease very courageous doctors . I would add do resort to other laboratories with their own diagnostics . These are not accepted . However by the CDC as confirming Lyme disease , so there’s a real tug of war going on now as to how to diagnose it properly .

Well , I think , physicians. First of all , have to be a little bit more inventive and courageous , if you will to veer off of these very dogmatic guidelines Lyme disease and it even says this on the CDC website can be a clinical diagnosis . In other words , a doctor can look at a patient assess the risk of being bitten by a tick maybe see that the person reports being bitten by a tick and say , I think you have Lyme disease . I’m going to treat you this generally doesn’t happen though . What happens is the the physicians follow the existing guidelines , which say you either have to have that that Lyme disease rash or you have to have a positive test . The problem with that is many people don’t get the rash or it’s not recognized or it’s in a place where it’s not seen it has many variations , so they get undiagnosed . So that’s the first thing doctors need to be a little bit more kit courageous and need to veer off of these very rigid guidelines . We also need a lot more research as to how to treat this disease . We need more clinical trials we rely basically on 4 old a very limited and highly questionable clinical trials trials that have been questioned in the the medical literature as inadequate . So I guess those are the first 2 things I would say we need to do .

And there is in fact a not so much a stigma but and and avoidance by medicine to deal with Lyme disease , you had mentioned over-diagnosis as a problem false diagnosis I checked to the medical literature when I wrote my book , and there were in fact 30 papers that dealt with 4th diagnosis of Lyme disease. The first one finding that a share of patients about half of patients who were tested in one laboratory tested positive . That is tested negative . In another one . This led to a great deal of , what I call copycat science and basically to me these papers questioned the ability of the test , frankly to diagnose but instead the message that got out to physicians was don’t falsely diagnose Lyme disease . Be careful . It’s part of that tamp it down mentality about Lyme disease . On the other side , though , there were only 5 papers that I could find find dealing with diagnosis of Lyme disease they’ll if you falsely diagnose Lyme disease you get it a couple of weeks of antibiotics , which are among the safest drugs there are , if you miss a diagnosis of Lyme disease . You may be destined for a very long siege and in many cases , a disease that is not possible to cure and many patients are put in sort of this holding pattern where they may be able to get it a physician periodically to give them some antibiotics work which help them but do not make them well , but the the typical thing that happens to someone who goes undiagnosed who’s Lyme disease gets out of control if they wind up on this merry go round doctor to doctor to doctor because many physicians do not want to treat advanced Lyme disease because the medical literature doesn’t acknowledge that it exists . Hi . Rather , the medical mainstream said one course of antibiotics . 10 to 28 days almost always kills the Lyme bug . This is not what science is finding today .