Review of the ontario pc 2018 electricity platform (national post version added) tom adams energy – ideas for a smarter grid gas leak


Patrick Brown’s election platform “guarantees” that the Ontario PCs “will fix Hydro”. He reverses the PC’s previous rejection of Premier Wynne’s Fair Hydro Plan, which shifts 25% of current household rates to taxpayers and future consumers. gas efficient cars 2016 The new PC position is that the only problem with Wynne’s hydro cost shifting and deferral program is that it doesn’t go far enough. Brown’s Ontario PCs are promising they will “save” households 12% on their rates over and above Wynne’s existing 25% cut.

Wynne’s electricity-rate deferral and cost-shifting program had been roundly criticized by both the legislature’s auditor general and financial-accountability officer. The PCs had hammered the government with this analysis. Just weeks ago, the PC’s energy critic, Todd Smith, attacked the Fair Hydro Plan, saying “It is deceitful, it’s dishonest and it’s shady.”

Brown’s largest cost shift — $433 million per year to until 2022 at least — is to move conservation costs to taxpayers. Electricity demand in Ontario has been falling since 2005, ratepayers are burdened with a massive surplus of power sold to neighbouring utilities for prices close to zero, and generators are being paid massive but undisclosed amounts to not generate any power. gas vs electric oven temperature Oblivious to all this, the PCs declare all existing conservation programs to be “worthwhile.”

Driving off the PCs’ longstanding opposition to the privatization of Hydro One, where they are aligned with the NDP, the other big-ticket cost-shifting item on Brown’s list is to rebate Hydro One’s dividends to households. The problem is that customers already receive every penny of Hydro One’s dividend payments to the government, albeit by way of the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC). In the Brown plan, taxpayers will keep OEFC whole for its foregone revenue.

The PCs also promise to repeal former premier Dalton McGuinty’s legacy Green Energy and Green Economy Act, much loved by renewable-energy developers for its rich subsidies. 76 gas station credit card login But now that it’s deeply threaded into the administrative legal structure of Ontario’s power situation, simply erasing the Green Energy Act is not an option. The PCs are silent on what they will replace the Green Energy Act with. Particularly given their recent flip-flop on Wynne’s Fair Hydro Plan, there is no way to know what their alternative might be.

Wynne’s justifications for her electricity policies are flock of canards that the PCs have never been able to effectively shoot down. e payment electricity bill maharashtra The Liberals just keep repeating that Ontario’s power exports and conservation programs are profitable and that wind and solar succeeded in getting rid of coal power. electricity magnetism and electromagnetism Compared to Brown’s electricity plan, Wynne’s suddenly look honest and responsible by comparison.

I believe all Canadians, need to know the qualifications of senior officials of all utilities. For example, persons overseeing the electrical utility, do they have engineering degrees in electrical design and implementation, if not why not. A person who touches your car, must have certificates of qualification and or a licence as do all other trades. We have engineers in these utilities, but how much input do they have in the decision making, not nearly enough. k electric jobs test Wynn, Trudeau and their cronies do not have a clue about what and how utilities work, so why do they make the decisions? Promises made by politicians should be quantified by facts and figures by persons whom have the knowledge, experience and expertise to support the claims made. At one time politicians did care about the people and the job they were tasked to do, but like most people, if they can con their way into doing less for more and getting great perks, legally or otherwise, they will do what benefits them. So sad that our politicians govern by “man’s inhumanity to man and screw you before you screw me” Unfortunate and sad, that we have the knowledge to fix things, but our greed and self servance gets in the way.

The first being enforcement of the contracts. One assumes this references “noise” and “bird and bat” migration issues in respect to industrial wind turbines. The MOECC has failed miserably at this and if they applied the regulations as written the amount of wind generated and grid accepted along with curtailed generation would be reduced considerably. gas x strips walmart One must assume no payments would be made for ordered constraint which would reduce the costs of IWT generation and reduce health complaints along with reduce both birds and bat deaths including many species at risk.

MPAC should be instructed that they should no longer simply assess IWT on the basis of $40K per MW capacity and instead treat them in the same way that would treat any other industrial operation and assess their taxable value accordingly. Rescind the former Finance Minister’s (Dwight Duncan) decree! That would benefit the rural communities who have been forced to accept IWT with no ability to reject them or benefit from their actual taxable capital cost.

The whole TOU pricing model should be examined and as one suggestion the first 750 kWh of consumption (or some other level close to that) should be at a much lower cost per kWh (all hours and all days) and increase considerably over that level. The benefit would be to all “average” households and small businesses. Consumption over that level could be set to ensure cost recovery that would catch those higher consuming households who can more readily afford it. In all likelihood that would increase consumption, reducing the surplus for exports and the constrained payments for wind, nuclear and hydro and presumably gas.