Rip george h. w. bush – page 3 – politics – surly horns table d gaskets


What did Bush 41 ever do with regard to global warming? (The right hadn’t rebranded it as "climate change" yet in order to distract from its anthropogenic nature while he was in office.) Banning  CFCs because of the hole in the ozone layer wasn’t climate related. k gas constant He didn’t care much about environmental  causes. I recall a speech he gave in opposition to some environmental cause lamenting that we’d lose jobs and be up to our necks in owls. He was totally part of the Republican war on science ushered in by Reagan.

It’s been almost 30 years, so I had to go back and refresh my memory. electricity formulas physics You’re right, he didn’t do nearly as much as I had recalled but I don’t think he was a climate change skeptic. Insofar as doing anything, the National Climate Assessment report is about all he can be credited for on that front, but we can also thank him for signing the Clean Air Act.

Through legislation he signed in 1990, Bush started the National Climate Assessment, a sweeping study documenting climate change’s impacts on the United States. The Trump administration released the latest iteration on Black Friday and has since downplayed its definitive body of research, making false claims about its accuracy and inadvertently drawing more attention to the clear science that shows Americans will be increasingly at risk as a result of climate change.

It was during Bush’s presidency that the federal government stepped up its work on global warming and established an ongoing account of the latest research into how the country would be affected by climate change. Bush was also president during the development of the Montreal Protocol, which drastically cut the chlorofluorocarbons that were destroying the ozone layer.

Through a 1989 presidential initiative, Bush established the U.S. gas vs electric oven cost Global Change Research Program, a program encompassing 13 federal agencies that seeks to understand the changing Earth system. The following year, he signed into law the Global Change Research Act of 1990, which mandated that the National Climate Assessment come out every four years.

“Building on Congressional proposals advanced during the 1980s, the President proposed legislation designed to curb three major threats to the nation’s environment and to the health of millions of Americans: acid rain, urban air pollution, and toxic air emissions,” EPA states on its website. “The proposal also called for establishing a national permits program to make the law more workable, and an improved enforcement program to help ensure better compliance with the Act.”

“That was kind of the beginning of Bush’s disillusion about his likely winning popularity by things he did in the environment,” Reilly said. “From the point of view of the environmentalists, he was Reagan’s vice president. And he did the Clean Air Act, he got really nothing for it … Bush decided finally, and the people around him had decided long before, that the environment would not work for him politically.”

Since Bush left office, his Republican predecessors, George W. gas knife lamb Bush and Trump, have been increasingly hostile to climate science and have resisted meaningful policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Much of their criticism has centered on the economic costs of environmental policy, a stance that environmental groups have widely denounced.

The latest National Climate Assessment shows that climate change will kill more Americans, displace thousands and cost tens of billions of dollars annually. Democrats have touted the findings as evidence that the government needs to craft significant climate policy and have promised to use its revelations in court cases challenging the administration. Some Republicans have acknowledged that the report requires action from Washington, as well, but most have questioned its findings without presenting any evidence to the contrary.

“By cutting pollution from cars, trucks, power plants and other sources, the measures have sharply reduced toxic chemicals in the air we breathe, dangerous ozone and the acid rain that was destroying American forests,” said Rhea Suh, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a statement. “The measures decreased asthma attacks, bronchitis, heart disease and other ills, preventing some 200,000 premature deaths and 20 million lost days at work or school every year to deliver up to $90 in public health benefits for every dollar invested in compliance.”

“He knew that our country matters far more than political party or personal ambition, and that the national interest demands that we protect America’s precious natural heritage,” Krupp said in a statement. “And he knew that there is no inherent conflict between environmental progress and economic progress, because the well-being of the nation requires both.”

I like GHWB and I voted for him because I thought he was still the best candidate at the time. electricity distribution costs His campaign did play on racism though he himself did not seem racist. gas density formula Back then you could not pass off to dirty hands ads like Willie Horton to outside groups. I super praise him for handing of the falling of the berlin wall, especially when you compare how our current Prez would have shit the bed managing that situation, with his endless grandstanding and imaginary ball spiking already. Imagine actually having something of achievement to point at?

I also think unfortunately a lot of the issues we have relating to migration from gang violence in Honduras and Guatemala was birthed from our arming Contras in these areas. When you arm gangs you don’t have control over what they do. Like murdering nuns for example. Only reason I really know details about all this was my term paper in Latin American Studies in the early 1980’s. ogasco abu dhabi When we stopping supporting the armed gangs (Contras) we created, they simply found other means of income, and are still at it today.