Should religion inform your politics – the dillard family hair electricity song


• When most people think about stewardship, they think of material things, but I believe Scripture is calling us to manage everything well that we have control over, including situations, knowledge, intellect, talents, processes, opportunities, etc… that can be used for good, to the glory of God. Even if we don’t like the government and drama associated with it, I think that Christians should definitely take advantage of the voting process. We fall short if don’t take what we’re given and make the best of it.

• Ecclesiastes 9 also talks about the importance of making the most of the time and working hard at whatever your hand finds to do. Again, most people think about vocational work in this passage, but I posit that “whatever your hand finds to do, do it with your might…” in verse 10 could apply to voting as well. Voting is a means by which we can contribute to the progress toward finding the best people to represent us in government, and if we abdicate that responsibility we are not using “all our might” so that good may triumph.

• As I mentioned in a previous point, this appears to be an example of Paul being a good steward of all God had entrusted him with.Each of us are born at a particular time, in a particular place, to a particular family, with particular opportunities. electricity jokes riddles There are many things about our lives that we cannot control, but we can control how we respond, by whether we do what we can with what we have.

• Furthermore, we are without excuse if we try to deceive ourselves or others. Proverbs 24:12 calls us to account by questioning “If you say, ‘behold, we did not know this,’ does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who keeps watch over your soul know it, and will he not repay man according to his work?” We can fool ourselves or others by claiming ignorance for the sake of personal preservation, but God, the creator of your soul, knows your heart fully, and he can never be deceived.

I mentioned above that we should be informedvoters. “Informed” is certainly the key word here. When you do your research on political candidates, you are evaluating the qualifications and determining to what degree they line up with your interests as a citizen of the US. Essentially, it’s a job interview for our public servants, and “we the people” are the boss. i electricity bill com An elected official’s job is to do what’s in the best interest of her/his constituency. I usually try to focus on a few main factors when informing my vote.

* Many Christians have been deceived into believing that they can somehow “convert” the kingdoms of this world to become the Kingdom of God. In the process they have put their energy and hopes into bringing about the Kingdom of God by working towards getting more influence with government in order to transform government. Some even believe that Jesus will return once we have transformed the world and created the millennial Kingdom.

*When Satan tempted Jesus he “showed Him all the kingdoms (political establishments of rule) of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said to Him, “All this authority I will give You, and their glory; for this has been delivered to me, and I give it to whomever I wish.” (Luke 4:5-6). Jesus did not deny that this was in the Devil’s power to do and thus He acknowledges that the kingdoms of the world do indeed belong to the Devil. There are many theories as to how and when the Devil acquired them, but the fact remains that they are his to give. Several times Jesus refers to the Devil as “the ruler of this world” John 12:31, 14:30, 16:11), confirming Satan’s dominion here on earth.

*At no stage do the kingdoms of the world morph into the Kingdom of God. There is not a single Scripture to support this popular misconception. gas bubble retinal detachment The kingdoms of this world are so evil that they are completely destroyed (Daniel 2 and Revelation 18) and they will be replaced by God’s Kingdom. This will be a work of God and not of man or the church. “The God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever” (Daniel 2:44). (See also Revelation 18 and 19).

*Just like many Christians today, Jesus’ disciples also did not understand the difference between God’s Kingdom and political kingdoms. They too thought that Jesus would merge His followers with the world’s kingdoms and thus bring about His Kingdom. But in response to these ideas Jesus clearly said to them: “indeed, the kingdom of God is within you” (Luke 17:21). In other words His Kingdom is spiritual and in the hearts of His people while the world’s kingdoms are political and have physical boundaries. (His Kingdom will ultimately become a physical kingdom, known as the Millennial Kingdom, but as said above, that will come about in a single cataclysmic event when He sets up His Kingdom.)

*When Pilate questioned Jesus about His Kingdom, Jesus explicitly stated “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). It cannot be clearer than that. Jesus is indeed a King and He has a Kingdom, but it is not of this world. gas vs diesel cars The god and ruler of this world and its kingdoms is Satan. These two kingdoms do not overlap, they do not merge and the one does not become the other. 1 electricity unit is equal to how many kwh They are totally different in substance and have different kings.

As per your essay you somehow used Paul’s right as a Roman citizen to further the Gospel as a reason somehow to expound on the fact that if you are a Christian you can use your American citizenship to further the gospel? Have a leg in politics? Use it as a right to vote? Your use there is confusing as it does not allow any premise to be used other than Paul not being beaten as it was against Roman Law (lex Sempronia) for a citizen of Rome to be beaten without speaking for himself. To wrongly claim Roman citizenship was a serious, even capital offense (Suetonius Claudius 25.3; Epictetus Discourses 3.24.41). He was not an Egyptian as they thought, but was a born free citizen of Rome. As for furthering the gospel he was speaking to his own kind. He was speaking to whom he was a member. Not the gentiles.

The The Sanhedrin was composed of the priestly and lay nobility of the Sadducean theological persuasion together with scribes of the Pharisee faction. Paul finds himself on trial because of the Messiah’s resurrection and the new realities it introduced. For if Jesus had not risen from the dead, he could not have appeared to Paul on the Damascus Road, or in the temple, and commissioned him to take the gospel to the Gentiles (Acts 22:15, 21). Paul would, then, not have promulgated a message or lived a lifestyle that his fellow Jews would have opposed.

James 3:17 You have pulled this verse completely out of it’s context to promote an agenda about politics that is not even remotely close to anything written in this chapter. Although this verse may be regarded as standing independent of what has preceded, and as being in the form of a more or less inexact quotation, it is quite permissible to take it with what has gone before. Those to whom the words have been addressed had, to some extent, erred through thoughtlessness; now that things have been made quite plain to them, they are in a position to know how to act; if, therefore, in spite of knowing now how to act aright, the proper course is neglected, then it is sinful.

Trying to persuade folks to feel guilty into civic duty by somehow leading us to believe it is furthering the gospel is ludicrous. Your thought patterns are scattered all over the place trying to pull something together that is not meant to be together. electricity 101 presentation It is trying to piecemeal parts, or trying to force puzzle pieces together that don’t fit. Moreover it is adding to scripture and meaning that is not there. And that is a grevous offence. Rev 22:18-19