Should we worry – page 11 lafayette la gas prices

########

I remember about 25 years ago, there were gas x reviews ratings projections by scientists that we were going to run out of fossil fuels in 25 years. I suspect this global warming scare will be the same.Nobody said we would run out of fossil fuels in 25 years. What was predicted was that petroleum production would peak in 25 or whatever years. And it will peak at some time; we just cannot accurately predict when, as new technologies for extracting petroleum, natural gas, etc. are developed. But the point (as you must know, deep inside) is that all fossil fuel production will peak at some time or other–for coal, we have centuries of coal. The question is–what happens when carbon that has taken literally hundreds of millions of years to accumulate deep below the surface of the earth, is brought up to the surface and burned within a few electricity usage in the us brief centuries, releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Nothing very good, that’s what. Whatever is not retained in the atmosphere to cause global greenhouse warming is absorbed in seawater, along with the excess heat, and acidifies the oceans. The evidence is irrefutable, and only a powerful antagonistic ideology attempts to refute it. Nature bats last, as environmentalists are fond of reminding us.

Nobody said we would run out of fossil fuels in 25 years. What was predicted was that petroleum production would peak in 25 or whatever years. And it will peak at some time; we just cannot accurately predict when, as new technologies for extracting petroleum, natural gas, etc. are developed. But the point (as you must know gas leak, deep inside) is that all fossil fuel production will peak at some time or other–for coal, we have centuries of coal. The question is–what happens when carbon that has taken literally hundreds of millions of years to accumulate deep below the surface of the earth, is brought up to the surface and burned within a few brief centuries, releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Nothing very good, that’s what. Whatever is not retained in the atmosphere to cause global greenhouse warming is absorbed in seawater, along with the excess heat, and acidifies the oceans. The evidence is irrefutable, and only a powerful antagonistic ideology attempts to refute it. Nature bats last, as environmentalists are fond of reminding us.you may have heard from a different source. But the one I heard said running out within 50 years (correction). Like I said there are lots of problems in the world gas prices going up 2016. Global warming itself, man-made or natural, if it is real (I never said it wasn’t possible) may not really be avoidable, with the current technology. We need to deal with consequences regardless, whichever problem we think is more critical. To me, climate change implementation is the less critical, and is a by-product of a different problem. We need to make lifestyle changes, curb population growth, etc.

Think of the phone industry. Do we really need to keep developing new , more advanced toys, when we should develop fuel cell technology that is a legitimate alternative power source way more efficient than wind and solar. Oh, but you like those toys, and would rather keep those g gas lol polutant industry, and family culture destroying things, and just keep taxing and throwing tax dollars into vanity low efficient energy projects? It’s throwing water out of a sinking boat than plugging up the hole

Phil, I’ve mentioned this before but you need to do even a little checking of your sources before you wholly give yourself to them. Nobody ever, outside of an insane asylum, said we we running out of fossil fuels in 50 years. Please provide any sort of source for that assertion.Of course I can’t find it now, since it is likely not to come true. I was in high school when I came across that. But why are we even arguing on details, when the crux of my argument is in the implementation. Do you know how much energy data centres require to run and cool? All the data centres for Facebook, Instagram, Google, etc. I’m sure would far, far outweigh any sort of renewable wind and solar energy we are putting back into the grid. Even TC here, you know how much energy to keep all those old threads, etc. available online? Apple is now a trillion $ industry, when all we need is a basic cell phone for emergencies, why is that? Along with competing phone making industries, how much energy is being used to develop and manufacture all these phones?

Creation Ministries International … does not have an ‘official’ position on this issue [AGW], stating that this 3 main gas laws is a ‘wisdom issue’ on which Christians can reasonably disagree. Likewise, creation scientists have generally been quite cautious on this issue. Physicist Russell Humphreys has argued that recent warming has occurred, but that it is not a reason for panic and that higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels likely contributed to abundant vegetation in the pre-Flood world. Likewise, creation scientist (and former meteorologist for the National Weather Service) Michael Oard has stated that a small amount electricity physics test of warming has occurred, but that most of the warming is probably due to natural climate variations. And atmospheric scientist (and former researcher at the Institute for Creation Research) Larry Vardiman did his own independent analysis of three different data sets and concluded that global warming had probably been occurring for the past 30–50 years. Of course, the fact that warming has occurred does not necessarily mean that it will continue, nor does it necessarily imply that human activity is responsible, as Vardiman was quick to point out.

The key figures in any discussion on fossil fuel consumption and resources are geologists. M. King types of electricity pdf Hubbert authored the first serious look in a 1949 article in the journal Science. Harrison Brown expanded upon Hubbert’s work in his 1954 book, The Challenge of Man’s Future. The more recent analyses specifically of petroleum were by the recently-deceased Kenneth Deffeyes. Deffeyes, whose mentor was Hubbert, worked for Shell Oil evaluating oil fields, then went on to 30 years as a distinguished geology professor at Princeton, writing several books on peak oil. He was the smartest man I ever met. You can easily find all three men on Wikipedia.

Regarding fuel cells: they require hydrogen, which either can come from releasing it from the hydrocarbon of fossil fuels–which just aggravates the problem–or splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen via electrolysis or some similar technology. One of the best uses to which solar and wind power can be put is to provide the electricity for the electrolysis of water and thus generate the hydrogen for the clean and efficient 4 gas planets fuel cell. Stored hydrogen and oxygen can also then serve as the source of electrical power during periods of low wind or weak or absent (nighttime) sun. Another reason to maximize wind and solar technologies.