Stop feeding your dog coconut oil keep the tail wagging gas laws


When reading this long list of benefits, how can I question the benefits of adding coconut oil to our dogs’ diet? But I wasn’t finished with my homework; I now wanted to learn why some people feel that dogs don’t need coconut oil. I’ve seen so many passionate discussions on this topic in groups (in some groups, mentioning coconut oil can lead to being banned) that I became curious. Is Coconut Oil a Fad with No Benefits?

When I was new to raw feeding, when Dr. Karen Becker makes a recommendation, that’s enough for me. p gasol stats But over the years, I’ve become more and more curious when conflict arose on social media surrounding topics discussed by Dr. Becker and Rodney Habib. When I read claims that coconut oil was a fad and today’s new snake oil – I began to wonder, are they right?

“There are some theoretical reasons to think the types of fat found in non-hydrogenated coconut oil might have health benefits in humans, but there is no conclusive research to support this. There is virtually no research on coconut oil in dogs and cats, apart from some studies looking at topical use for treatment of parasites. Therefore, the health effects, both risks and benefits, are unknown and supported only by unreliable anecdotal evidence.” Source: Should We Stop Feeding Our Dogs Coconut Oil?

Whenever I see the phrase “anecdotal evidence,” I get my panties in a bunch, because I’ve often read and heard this regarding the benefits of raw feeding. I find the phrase condescending and dismissive. Little to no evidence of the benefit of a diet didn’t stop me from switching my dogs from commercial dry dog food to raw dog food. And it won’t stop me from adding coconut oil to my dogs’ diet – or will it? But I understand that the phrase “anecdotal evidence” is valid. gas jet compressor Too many times, I’ve added supplements to my dogs’ diet simply because people in a group said that they were beneficial and they were unnecessary. I’ve learned that anecdotal evidence is fine, but I still need to do my homework for the benefit of my dogs. Myths of Coconut Oil for Dogs

Coconut oil is a saturated fat, a medium chain fatty acid, that is nearly 50% lauric acid. “When lauric acid is digested, it also forms a substance called monolaurin. Both lauric acid and monolaurin can kill harmful pathogens like bacteria, viruses and fungi. gas near me cheap For example, these substances have been shown to help kill the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (a very dangerous pathogen) and the yeast Candida albicans, a common source of yeast infections in humans.” Source:

If you read up on fats, you may come across statements that medium chain fatty acids lead to increased cholesterol by raising your LDL. However, it also raises your HDL, which helps to remove the LDL. And “epidemiological studies find that groups of people who include coconut as part of their native diets (e.g., India, Philippines, Polynesia) have low rates of cardiovascular disease.” This can due to the coconut oil or other parts of their lifestyle or both. gaston y astrid lima Source: How to Choose a Good Coconut Oil

I used to alternate coconut oil with fish oil, but in my research on the benefits of coconut oil (see, we gotta do our homework), I learned that this was unnecessary. Coconut oil isn’t the same as fish oil. My dogs do get their Omega 3 fatty acids through fish oil, raw sardines, phytoplankton, and carp burgers. I add coconut oil to their diet as follows:

Once again I was reminded not to take everything I read at face value. It’s important to explore all sides of an issue, to help us make a more educated choice about our dogs’ health and diet. If I choose to give my dogs coconut oil every now and then or every day (which I do through the golden paste), I feel that I’m doing it with a lot more information rather than because everyone else is feeding it to their dogs.

Regarding anecdote and personal experience, it is a frustrating and disappointing fact that these are not reliable guides to what is true or false in healthcare, but it is a fact nonetheless. Admitting this is true, about myself as much as anyone else, isn’t arrogance, it’s humility. Every idea, and certainly every medical therapy, including those that have turned out to be clear failures, has been supported by anecdotal evidence. gas prices going up 2016 Thousands of people over thousands of years would have sworn to you that bloodletting cured all sorts of disease, yet science has shown us conclusively it didn’t work and in fact did more harm than good.

Anecdotal evidence is a test nothing ever fails. Even when there are competing anecdotes with different conclusions, it doesn’t help us because everyone just pays attention to the stories that support what they believe and ignores those that don’t. Relying on scientific evidence instead of anecdote is how we have doubled our life expectancy, eradicated disease we suffered from for millennia, dramatically reduced childhood mortality, and accomplished all of the other improvements in health that have made us the longest-lived and healthiest generation in human history.

Your response made me cringe as well. What you fail to understand is that this is all a learning process for me and many others which is why I started this personal blog. I don’t think I’m alone when I say that it ticks me off when people dismiss me when I’m trying to engage in a dialogue. It’s fine that you only want to explore science, however, if that means that you’re closed off to the experience that others have and will not take that into consideration, then there is no point in us having a discussion. What you miss in your haste to call me immature, weak, and dangerous is that we are not able to learn and grow when we fail to have a back and forth discussion on the issues.

What I appreciated about SkepVet and others is that these people took the time to share their knowledge, causing me to take a step back and realize that I was doing something without a clear understanding of why. Had these people not shared their information, had they simply dismissed me thoughts and experience because it wasn’t “science,” then how am I to learn. r gas constant kj And at no point do I pretend that my way is the only way.

I got to watch vets scoff and make fun of owners using CBD oil for pain, time and time again as a vet student. But all I heard from thousands of people who used it was that it helped. Why are we ignoring the experience of SO MANY people just because science has not caught up with current therapies or ideas? Someone who truly understands science knows that nothing can be known with true certainty, and everything must be taken seriously least we ignore things due to our own inherent bias. Bias is a killer of scientific thought, and group think is strong regardless of the topic. Cornell just released a study that found CBD oil to be effective in osteoarthritis in dogs, and owners everywhere responded with, WE KNOW.

If I had a penny for the amount of times I heard owners tell us that after they switched to grain-free, their dog’s skin problems went away, I would be able to pay for my vet school education!! But all I hear from vets is that there is no research so therefore, it’s invalid. That’s /stupid/. ALL science starts with an observation. r gasquet tennis Low and behold, there is a grain-free prescription diet out now, that is labeled for… skin issues.

There is not enough money to go around the vet community, so scientific research is very lacking. Add in the fact that because there are no funds, a lot of research is produced by the company making the product, and you have the grounds for rampant bias. Drugs are used off-label, dosages are guessed, and numerous things are done by vets because it ‘seems to work.’ Yet, when our clients tell us something that works for them, suddenly the things they experience are less valid than ours, even though neither have undergone scientific scrutiny. Some of my classmates are the last people I’d want to figure out correlation vs causation, so a scientific degree doesn’t suddenly make them any better than the general population.