Talk hydropower – wikipedia electricity kwh cost uk

############

Water power is becoming more and more important. The total capacity of the world’s hydro plants is growing. Therefore, each number telling about capacity and percentage should get a date and, ideally, a source. I’m sorry I can’t do that (don’t know where to get reliable statistics), but I want to encourage anyone writing stuff like Hydroelectric gas in stomach power now supplies about 715,000 MWe or 19% of world electricity. to give information of where he found these numbers, and the date electricity labs high school.–Andreas, 15. June 06

I have changed the ratings on this article to C as it is nowhere near meeting the criteria for B. Most of it has no references and the one reference for the section on resources in the US is a dead link. The references section is a mixture of general references, with no indication of which parts of the publications grade 6 electricity project ideas are being are referrred to, and inline citations. Also, the lead should summarise the article but it doesn’t, as a number of the terms mentioned are not in the main body of the text. Richerman ( talk) 22:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

It’d be nice to find acre feet referenced in any test code. It would also be nice if we didn’t have a murky notion of energy and power, and if we could get the density of water right, and if we admit that acres have different definitions, and electricity prices going up if we recognized that static head is not the sole factor (hint: what makes the water flow to the turbine in the first place?), etc. But don’t listen to me, I only do turbine efficiency testing for a living gaston y daniela. — Wtshymanski ( talk) 13:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Fine, so check and fix it – but please stop blanking an entire section because you have yet another of your personal beefs with it. Andy Dingley ( talk) 14:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

What a load that was…now at the cost of an hour worth of editing we have two redundant equations that won’t impress anyone gastric sleeve scars who’s made it past Grade 6 arithmetic (or whatever the equivalent is in your local educational system). And the bewildered Grade 6 reader is going to wonder why we introduced this wonderful acre foot and then don’t use it ever again? But Andy has spoken and acre-foot must be retained. At least now that section shows some clue about the difference between energy and power, and the density of water…and it doesn’t abuse significant figures so much. The article was better off without the redundant mp electricity bill payment paschim kshetra math tutorial. — Wtshymanski ( talk) 15:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I doubt that very much. Especially not when you’ve just deleted an equation for the efficiency (which I would have to agree though is pretty trivial) behind an edit summary that gas city indiana car show said you were just simplifying units. Andy Dingley ( talk) 22:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC) What the edit summary actually says is per talk page discussion, only use relevant units ; link for the metrically challenged. Fathoms aren’t relevant to hydropower, neither are nautical miles nor acre-feet. — Wtshymanski youtube gas pedal lyrics ( talk) 01:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

In case anyone out there reading this has missed it, Dingley is calling me a liar. Of course, he’s so terribly clever, he’s confident that I haven’t noticed yet. I’ve cleaned up more of the crappy math lesson for you but try as I might, I couldn’t find acre-feet, fathoms, nautical miles or hogsheads listed in any of the discussions of hydropower I consulted this morning. And one has to look at distressingly thick books gas 4 less redding ca to find all those factors listed in one equation; most people seem happy to say a cubic metre is a ton and let it go at that. I’ve no idea how many Troy ounces are in an acre-foot, though. — Wtshymanski ( talk) 19:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC) See [ edit ]

As of February 2018, External links modified talk page sections are ag gaston birmingham 120 no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the External links modified sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

As of February 2018, External links modified talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page arkansas gas association notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the External links modified sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018 electricity vs magnetism venn diagram).

I believe the section called Hydroelectricity has been misnamed. It should be called Hydroelectric Power, also a common term used for Hydroelectric Power generation. In normal speaking, just; hydroelectric, is often short for both terms. For example, see; DINKEY CREEK pictures electricity pylons HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT WATER RIGHTS DECISION. For example the first sentence is wrong: Hydroelectricity is the application of hydropower to generate electricity. But in fact; Hydroelectric Power (generation), or just eon replacement gas card Hydroelectric is the application of hydropower to generate electricity (or presumably; to generate hydroelectricity).

However, the Hydroelectricity can also be used to store energy… is a correct usage, electricity is electricity when it comes to the end usage. Does the word; hydroelectricity even exist? Both www .merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hydroelectricity and en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/hydroelectric#hydroelectric go to hydroelectric. I write more arguments, with several URLs at Talk:Hydroelectricity#Merge. Thoughts?