The dangers of designer babies opinions gas zone


If someone gave you the option to choose exactly what your future child would look like, would you take it? It may seem like something from the distant future, parents picking out what color eyes and hair they want their kids to have, but as further advancements are made in the area of genetic engineering, it may very well soon be a possibility. As one would expect, this caused ethical concerns to rise over the idea of people genetically modifying human embryos. There are many possible bad gas 6 weeks pregnant objectives for these modifications, from grade 9 electricity unit review decreasing a child’s likelihood of developing a life-threatening disease, to enhancing certain traits and abilities. However, when people talk about “designer babies,” they mostly mean children whose parents have picked out what physical features they want them to have. While this raises the obvious quest ion of whether this is ethical or not, the larger implications of this could have a drastic effect on our society. We currently live in a society in which Eurocentric features are seen as the standard for beauty. Things like small noses, fair skin, light colored eyes, double eyelids, and un-textured gas or electricity more expensive hair are, overall, seen as more desirable compared to large noses, dark skin, dark eyes, monolids, and textured hair. This preference is both a product of racism and a facilitator of it. Obviously not every person on earth has these preferences, but our society as a whole tends to label people with these types of features as more beautiful than others, which can be seen in the racial diversity (or lack thereof) on fashion runways and editorial magazines. Models with ethnic features are nearly impossible to find and certainly aren’t well known in the industry. These Eurocentric beauty gas near me app sta ndards have a significant effect on how people of color perceive their own appearances, especially as children. While some progress has been made, in general, children with ethnic features grow up disliking their appearance and wishing to change it. Multi-billion dollar industries are built around these desires, from lightening creams and hair relaxers to cosmetic surgeries designed to get rid of or reduce the appearance of ethnic features. These industries are particularly prominent in Asia, where colorism runs rampant. Skin lightening creams are so commonplace and accepted in South Asia that they’re endorsed by the most famous actors and actresses. In East Asia, rhinoplasty and electricity usage by appliance double eyelid surgery are extremely common, especially in South Korea where it’s perpetuated and normalized by the k-pop industry. After seeing the great lengths many people will go to in order to achieve Eurocentric beauty standards, it’s obvious why there should be concern surrounding the concept of “designer babies.” If parents are able to choose what features their babies have, it’s likely that many will lean towards choosing things such as small noses, light colored eyes, double eyelids, and maybe even lighter colored skin tones. This, combined with the fact that for the most part, only rich, upper-class people would be able to afford such a thing, could add a whole new layer of racism to our society gas symptoms. People whose parents chose their features out for them could look down on those who couldn’t afford the same thing. If these people’s parents chose very Eurocentric features, they would also be looking down on people with more ethnic features, and, in a society in which racism is still running strong, this could reinforce racist ways of thinking as well as increase the econ omical aspect to racism that already exists. We’re currently just b games virus now starting to break the mold and celebrate more diverse ethnic features that were once considered undesirable, and allowing something such as “designer babies” could set this progress back in the opposite direction, especially if it becomes widespread. Even further, some fear that pre-natal genetic modifications could also lead to a whole new type of discrimination and elitism based on genetic makeup similar to the 1997 movie Gattaca, where certain genes are thought of as more favorable, and people with these genes are seen gas ark as more valuable to society than those without them. This type of discriminatory system could be incredibly dangerous because people might attempt to use science as a justification. This genetic discrimination could also be coupled with racism if some of the genes that are considered ‘unfavorable’ are most commonly found in certain racial groups. Overall it’s clear that the static electricity human body causes introduction of “designer babies” into our society would have largely negative repercussions and is not something that should be done lightly. Genetic engineering is one of the most groundbreaking scientific developments in modern times, but there needs to be limits on what it should and should not be used for, and pre-natal genetic modification for purely aesthetic purposes might have more negative consequences than positive.