The klein law firm reminds investors of class actions on behalf of shareholders of spb, mhld, amr and mbt – marketwatch gas calculator

###############

NEW YORK, March 22, Mar 22, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE via COMTEX) — NEW YORK, March 22, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Klein Law Firm announces gas after eating salad that class action complaints have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff.

According to the complaint, Spectrum Brands Legacy, Inc. (f/k/a Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.) allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Spectrum gas kansas had been self-inflicting the operational issues at its Ohio and Kansas facilities; (ii) these operational issues were, in fact, recurring in nature; (iii) these operational issues would continuously impact production, shipping levels and sales; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants misrepresented the quality and nature of Maiden’s underwriting and risk management policies and practices and the risks of its reinsurance portfolio. In particular, defendants misleadingly claimed that they were subjecting AmTrust’s insurance portfolio to robust analysis and cross-checks to ensure that the Company had appropriately priced the risk of reinsuring AmTrust’s insurance portfolio. In truth, the Company had failed to employ sufficient gas laws worksheet answers chemistry underwriting and risk management protocols and had largely abdicated its responsibility to ensure that its AmTrust Reinsurance segment priced policies commensurate with the risk assumed by the Company.

Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. (AMR) f/k/a Silver Run Acquisition Corporation II (nasdaqcm:AMR) Class Period: Purchasers of Silver Run II securities March 24, 2017-February 25, 2019 and investors who held Silver Run II Class A common stock as of January 22, 2018 and were entitled to vote concerning Silver arkansas gas prices Run II’s acquisition of Alta Mesa and Kingfisher Midstream LLC Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 1, 2019

The complaint alleges that during the class period Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. (AMR) f/k/a Silver Run Acquisition Corporation II made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Alta Mesa and Kingfisher did not possess superior quality and [w]orld [c]lass assets as compared to other operators in the oil and gas industry; (2) Alta Mesa faced significant operational setbacks; (3) several major oil producers gas variables pogil key had steered assets away from production in the region in which Alta Mesa operates; and (4) Kingfisher and Alta Mesa were not on track to achieve the earnings and production estimates provided in the Proxy and Defendants had no reasonable basis to believe and did not believe that Kingfisher and Alta Mesa would achieve these estimates.

The complaint alleges Mobile TeleSystems PJSC made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) MTS gas yojana and its subsidiary were involved in a scheme to pay $420 million in bribes in Uzbekistan; (2) consequently, MTS knew q gastrobar or should have known it would be forced to pay substantial fines to the U.S. government after disclosing in 2014 that the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission were investigating its Uzbekistan operations; (3) MTS’ level of cooperation with the U.S. government and remediation was lacking; (4) due to the aforementioned misconduct, MTS would be forced to pay approximately $850 million in criminal penalties to the U.S. government; and (5) as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.